« hour three | Main | Still not safer......... »

September 14, 2004

post show post

Tom Harkin, Senator from Iowa.

Markos Moulitsas, of the blog Daily Kos.

Jan Schneider, candidate for Congress in Florida's 13th district and opponent of 2000 election stealer Katherine Harris.

Daniel Wilkinson, of Human Rights Watch, and author of "Silence on the Mountain: Stories of Terror, Betrayal, and Forgetting in Guatemala".

Contribute to Jan Schneider, candidate for Congress in Florida and opponent of the evil Katherine Harris.


*** MAKE A DIFFERENCE ****

The firSt debate is September 30th, at the U. of Miami. Make sure the moderator, Jim Lehrer, asks tough questions of George Bush. Contact him with your suggestions on how to hold George Bush accountable:

Address:

The NewsHour
PBS
1320 Braddock Place
Alexandria, VA 22314

Phone: 703-739-5000

Fax: 703-739-8458

Email: newshour@pbs.org


*** DON'T LET THIS ELECTION BE STOLEN ***

Bev Harris, an investigative journalist, has shown how it might be. You can read about it at Black Box Voting.

Air America is trying to get Harris a bigger platform by getting her booked on The Oprah Winfrey Show. Email Oprah and suggest she book Harris.


Meet one of Bush's foreign policy experts (Richard Perle, from Sept. 22, 2003).


In New York this weekend?
Check out Downtown For Democracy's "Joyful September," featuring performances by Trisha Brown, Bill T. Jones, Lisa Kron, The Lynne Cheney Players, Mark Crispin Miller, Maggie Moore, Richard Move, Mandy Patinkin, Will Power, Lou Reed, and Carmelita Tropicana.

Posted by not sam at September 14, 2004 07:25 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
../../../cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/472

Comments

Frost !!!

Posted by: Ajax at September 14, 2004 10:01 PM

CRACKER!

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 10:01 PM

Peaches

Posted by: Buck Fush at September 14, 2004 10:01 PM

in the lounge janeane our star
spotted o’rielly so lonely and far
kindness it caught her
ordered a vinegar and water
for that douchbag at the end of the bar

Posted by: RWiley [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:01 PM

was a real good
pro show
way to go!

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 14, 2004 10:02 PM

Canada beat Finland in hockey yay.

Posted by: ng at September 14, 2004 10:02 PM

Can someone tell me what "trackback pings" means?

Posted by: Meg at September 14, 2004 10:05 PM

hee hee

ilo almost got 2 frists!

(type and save ahead of time

then u can paste and

save a second r 2!)

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 14, 2004 10:05 PM

why hey!
didn't see you all there,

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 10:06 PM

Peaches!!!

Posted by: Mel [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:06 PM

Despite disenchantment with candidates, Ohio's youth plans to vote

By ADAM SMELTZ

Knight Ridder Newspapers

CLEVELAND - Young adults in the presidential battleground of Ohio aren't thrilled with their choices this election, but they say they'll vote Nov. 2 - no matter how jaded they may be.

"Maybe if we had a president who smoked weed once in a while, it'd be cool. Someone we could relate to," said Benjamin Henson, 23, a University of Cincinnati student who works at a valet-parking stand in downtown Cleveland.

That pipe dream may resonate with some of the 18- to 24-year-olds across the state, but most young Ohioans care more about the economy, lost jobs and the well-being of their friends and siblings who are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

They also worry about the potential for a return of the draft, even though President Bush and his opponent, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., have stopped well short of proposing one.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/special_packages/election2004/9662512.htm

Posted by: pablo at September 14, 2004 10:08 PM

Can someone tell me what "trackback pings" means?

Posted by: Meg at September 14, 2004 10:05 PM

TrackBack ping: a ping in this context means a small message sent from one webserver to another.

Posted by: RWiley [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:08 PM

The

Renaissance

Starts

NOW!

Posted by: ScrewCircles. at September 14, 2004 10:08 PM

Sunshine! Your suggestion is thoughtful, but I'm not so competitive anyway. It's funny, though; tonight I place 1st & 2d - just missed the trifecta.
:)

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 10:08 PM

TrackBack ping: a ping in this context means a small message sent from one webserver to another.

Posted by: RWiley at September 14, 2004 10:08 PM
----------

Yes but what does it mean? What purpose does it serve?

Posted by: Meg at September 14, 2004 10:09 PM

a ping in this context means a small message sent from one webserver to another.

Posted by: RWiley
+++++++++++++++++
Does this mean we are all communicating using the ping's English?

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 10:09 PM

Does this mean we are all communicating using the ping's English?

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 10:09 PM

yuk yuk

Posted by: RWiley [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:10 PM

Can someone tell me what "trackback pings" means?

Posted by: Meg at September 14, 2004 10:05 PM
----------------------
It alerts you when a link is made to a page. So if dKos links to this blog, a trackback ping will alert us and let us surf on over to see what they did with it.

Posted by: nmark in Toledo at September 14, 2004 10:10 PM

Long live the ping!!!

Posted by: Mel [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:11 PM

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=healthNews&storyID=6236453

too late for us 20 somethings, but good luck!

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 10:11 PM

Yes but what does it mean? What purpose does it serve?

Posted by: Meg at September 14, 2004 10:09 PM

It allows the web servers to post messages to each other....like we post on the blog.....we don't see them if they are posted......

Posted by: RWiley [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:12 PM

Trackback details:
http://www.movabletype.org/trackback/beginners/

Posted by: nmark in Toledo at September 14, 2004 10:12 PM

ping ping ping

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:13 PM

pong, pong, pong

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:14 PM

Posted on Tue, Sep. 14, 2004

Bob Herbert -- Suppressing the black vote

By Bob Herbert

More than 80 percent of the population of Detroit is black. This is very well understood by John Pappageorge, who is white and a Republican state legislator in Michigan. ``If we do not suppress the Detroit vote,'' said Pappageorge, ``we're going to have a tough time in this election.''

Oops! Republicans aren't supposed to actually say they want to suppress black votes. That's so retro. It's so Jim Crow. This is the 21st century, and the thing now is to do the dastardly deed, but never ever acknowledge it.

That's where our friend Pappageorge went wrong.

After his startling quote was published several weeks ago in the Detroit Free Press, Pappageorge, who is 73, apologized and said he certainly never meant to suggest that anything racist or illegal take place. But he reiterated to me in a phone conversation last Friday that he did indeed mean that the vote in Detroit needed to be kept down.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/opinion/9660865.htm

Posted by: pablo at September 14, 2004 10:14 PM

http://www.japantoday.com/e/?content=popvox&id=514

japanese twentysomethings opinion on flights w/ armed gaurds.

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 10:15 PM

pings are harmless but pongs can hurt ya....

Posted by: RWiley [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:15 PM

bandelicious:
Solidarność

Posted by: callback to last thread at September 14, 2004 10:15 PM

"pings are harmless but pongs can hurt ya...."

Tres bon

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:16 PM

MR plus:
-ear close to the ground,
-brings up issues/news quickly
-responsive and can sense the blogosphere.

need fixing:
-weak on analytical tool.
-need updating on major historical thought.
-total botch and kneejerk when it come to complex scientific issue

for eg:

-JN (9/14): Same old same old..on and on and on..History just repeast.
- penchant to apply psychoanalysis when viewing event.
- (9/13): complete failure to comprehend che's role in political history. Unable to contextual Che's work in current political situation and the relevancy of the movie.

Solution:
- quickly update on big ideas and outline in the area of history and philosophy. get a quickie book such as 'The Oxford companion to philosophy.'

eg. ...for Hegel thought that history displays a rational process of development, and, by studying it, we can understand our own nature and place in the world. This idea of history having emaning can be interpreted as a reworking of the religious idea that the world was created by a being with some purpose in mind but it may also be understood in a more limited way, as a claim that history has a direction that we can discern, and is heading to a goal that we can welcome.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:16 PM

Here's a pic of some Iraqis
showing us the love;

from:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3657232.stm

Angry crowds gathered near the site of the explosion, denouncing the US military and the interim government of Prime Minister Ayad Allawi
for failing to protect police recruiting centres.

Posted by: Ajax at September 14, 2004 10:17 PM

ping pong blongwater

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:17 PM

Alert! Alert!

Radio Station Gremlin - the radio station is WGTZ Z-93 out of Dayton Ohio is running a contest to see who can steal the most Kerry Lawn signs. If you find this to be reprehensible here is their contact page: http://www.wgtz93.com/email.html

Gremlin
=======================
I went to the WGTZ Z-93 webiste, but was unable to find any information describing the contest you mention.

Is there any confirmation of your statement?

I don't wish to jump into action based on false allegations, you see, but ...

otherwise ...

WGTZ Z-93 ought to be apprised that such a "contest" is a violation of Federal law, under Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1985(3), which states in part:

"if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy"

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/42/1985.html

WGTZ Z-93 is likely to find such a contest has some rather unwelcome consequences for the conspirators.

HOWEVER, before I, myself, send an email to WGTZ Z-93 I would like to confirm that such a contest has been offered by the radio station.

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 10:19 PM

This is a form of content aggregation--by sending a TrackBack ping to a central server, visitors can read all posts about that topic. For example, imagine a site which collects weblog posts about [Janeane Garofalo]. Anyone interested in reading about [JG] could look at this site to keep updated on what other webloggers were saying about [MajorityReportRadio], etc.

http://www.movabletype.org/trackback/beginners/

oh.

i did not know that.

Posted by: TrackbackPing... GoodIdea at September 14, 2004 10:19 PM

Has anyone called PBS? Their answering service is on (live) right now...

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 10:20 PM

1015 US Soldiers have died in Iraq. That's 10 since anyone said anything, anywhere about it.

Disgusting.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 14, 2004 10:20 PM

nader in florida get it while it hurts.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/09/15/wus15.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/09/15/ixworld.html

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 10:20 PM

Wanda, you're trying to sell a tractor to a biker.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:23 PM

1015 US Soldiers have died in Iraq. That's 10 since anyone said anything, anywhere about it.
Disgusting.
Posted by: Fishgrease at September 14, 2004 10:20 PM
--------------------------
Not to mention another forty-some-odd Iraqis.

Posted by: Crank Bait at September 14, 2004 10:23 PM

Here's an idea for a debate question...

403,300 high tech jobs lost in past 3 years
Over half of those came after recession's end in Nov. 2001

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6002122/

"President Bush, your administration maintains that outsourcing is good for America and actually creates jobs in our country. Please explain why the data shows the opposite."

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 14, 2004 10:23 PM

Fishgrease;

if you don't talk about the dead
then nobody died

they're more than disgusting Fish,
they're evil incarnate

Posted by: Ajax at September 14, 2004 10:24 PM

Also revealing about MR view on 'Che':

unfamiliar with che's work and his place in Latin amrican history, marxist movement, the idea of marxism, marxism idea as historical/social/politics analytical cool.

We spend the big part of last century in cold war struggling through the idea of marxism.

at least read up and inform on the basic idea instead of blurting idiotic remark like : 'memorable picture .. ..how come not Gandhi?'

It reveals the inability to understand how a player and the image of a player come to be in history and how JG trying to apply hollywood understanding of image generation onto Che's imagery.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:25 PM

If anyone knows of two or more persons working in concert to steal Kerry signs, take note of the post above:

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 10:19 PM

AND, contact your local affiliate of the National Lawyers Guild, ACLU, or a civil rights attorney.

[IMHO]

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 10:25 PM

1015 US Soldiers have died in Iraq. That's 10 since anyone said anything, anywhere about it.

Disgusting.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 14, 2004 10:20 PM

Very.

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 10:25 PM

~President Bush, your administration maintains that outsourcing is good for America and actually creates jobs in our country. Please explain why the data shows the opposite.~

Pessimism. Have a little Faith.

Posted by: Ditto. Ditto, Ditto. at September 14, 2004 10:26 PM

as a claim that history has a direction that we can discern, and is heading to a goal that we can welcome.
Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:16 PM

Hi wanda! ... if I were to harard a guess ... I might suggest that your pants are made of fine Chinese silk ... possibly with decorative embroidery and a shiney brass clasp ... tasteful and elegant.

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:27 PM

Wanda, you're trying to sell a tractor to a biker.
Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:23 PM //

Jeanine is trying to 'understand' and explain various historical process/event using plenty of pop psychology.

might as well tell her that she is NOT the first one trying to do it, and philosophy is full of attempt trying to explain history/event/social process, etc.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:27 PM

Ok, simple anon. poster, which would you rather do, rebuild infrastructure there, or here? Pretty simple.

Posted by: at September 14

You worthless no name slob of course rebuild over there. much better than more mass funerals in this country from ragheads like in sep 2001 Imagine the bawlin' you people would be doing if Bush hadn't of taken action then later sadass would have hit us with anthrax. you would now be blaming bush for not taking preventative action. you can't have it both ways dumb ass

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:28 PM

Crank Bait,

~~~ Not to mention another forty-some-odd Iraqis. ~~~

Strangely, *some* of the Iraqi deaths are being reported. Well, maybe not so strange when you consider the Bush Administration believes, perhaps correctly, that Americans don't care about Iraqi deaths.... at all. They've discovered very little downside in allowing the media to report Iraqi deaths. BIG downside for Bush in the reporting of the deaths of American soldiers.

You'd think we'd hear about them on Air America. Do we?

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 14, 2004 10:28 PM

Evening blogger nuts.
Just got Darlene's email. Her grandson is adorable.
Even looks like he is smiling.

What did I miss? Just got home from a Birthday party.

Posted by: tonid at September 14, 2004 10:28 PM

Show a little faith
there's magic in the night
you ain't a beauty
but eh you're alright
and that's alright with me...

Posted by: Mel [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:29 PM

Vote for me and I'll gitcha a job at Walmart!

Posted by: W at September 14, 2004 10:29 PM

~~~ Have a little Faith. ~~~

Exactly what I've got.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 14, 2004 10:30 PM

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?id=20004&letter_id=107554101


unfreakin beweabable!!!!!!


You're the man to fill the shoes no other can, except God...

To:
President George Bush

September 14, 2004

Mr. President, I'm not saying you are equal to God as an idol, but you are a god-like figure as a leader to the people of the US. In that I mean, you are the one we rely on to carry our country through every storm and situation. I have come to believe that Mr. Kerry and others who are trying so hard to put you down have a guilty conscious and are jealous of you. You are a man who stands by what he believes in and acts on those beliefs as our forefathers did--that makes the unbelievers feel guilty. They are jealous because they don't have the morals, standards and principles you do. In fact, their morals, standards and principles have told us exactly what to think about them. In raising my son, I always lived by the standard that what I did in my life caused him to believe it was the normal for his life, and I am still a good mom for holding on to those beliefs. I admire you, Mr. President. I am praying that God does not allow the "unfit" people of this country in office to tear our morals, standards and principles down even more. I hold you in my prayers every day. I think you have done an excellent job in running this country, and you have made the right decisions for us. Who has the right to say differently? Mr. Clinton? Look at his morals and standards exposed to us while he was in office as well as his military record. Mr. Kerry? He says all bad things about you but can't back any of them up and look at his military record. The ones who follow their leads just don't have a real backbone to stand up with--they are like puppets or mimes, whatever it takes to get them some attention. Everything I hear may not be exact, but I know a man who has leadership qualities when I see one.

I thank God daily for your leadership as our president and I sincerly pray we keep you another four years. I wish it could be longer than that.

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:31 PM

you can't have it both ways dumb ass
Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:28 PM

But you sure can! ... here ... this link might help you out:
http://www.eroticuniversity.com/toys/toys/Doublebones.jpg

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:31 PM

- you ain't a beauty -
======================
*piffle*

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 10:31 PM

Show a little faith
there's magic in the night
you ain't a beauty
but eh you're alright
and that's alright with me...

Posted by: Mel at September

AAAAAAHHH... Music to my ears...

...Faith will be rewarded...

Posted by: Cocky-With-Christ at September 14, 2004 10:32 PM

I like pop psychology.

Root beer is best,
but ice cold orange
is all that.

Posted by: Ajax at September 14, 2004 10:32 PM

Hi wanda! ... if I were to harard a guess ... I might suggest that your pants are made of fine Chinese silk ... possibly with decorative embroidery and a shiney brass clasp ... tasteful and elegant.
Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:27 PM //

actually not wearing any... hah...
my point: either she keeps doing what she is doing and sounded like a goof when it counts, or she inform herself of major works in the area.

otherwise she sounds like a medieval astrologer trying to explain star movements in the middle of cosmology conference. She is 400 yrs too late. Even Plato will chuckle listening JG shrieking about why a leader is doing this or that.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:32 PM

Hi tonid, mel, fish!!!

I just got in ... how was the show? ...

wanda ... what was the scientific topic of which you speak?

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:33 PM

I hate that even on our side we have to "be careful" about bringing it up... I just wish politicians would be brave enough to say, "why is it that we don't care about the human lives lost at our hand? This is a sad day for us. What kind of humanity are we showing, by saying tens of thousands of deaths do not count? What does this say about us? It is a very slippery slope to depravity and cruelty and inhumanity......."

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 10:34 PM

I like Wanda. She speaks on the little things that make me quietly cringe. Then I don't have to take the heat. ;)

Posted by: Cocky-With-Christ at September 14, 2004 10:35 PM

Jeanine is trying to 'understand' and explain various historical process/event using plenty of pop psychology.

might as well tell her that she is NOT the first one trying to do it, and philosophy is full of attempt trying to explain history/event/social process, etc.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:27 PM

Janeane tends to view anyone with a different opinion from hers as having a charactor defect. That's not pop psychology, that's just arrogance.

Posted by: W@W at September 14, 2004 10:36 PM

Geez,

We did get hit by anthrax.
More than likely some of our
own homegrown right wing brand
of terrorist and golly ge whiz
thar pard, Bush didn't do squat.

Posted by: Ajax at September 14, 2004 10:36 PM

oh mamamamamamamannnnnnn!!!!!

check out dubyas newly minted coin.

super super sweet.

http://www.govmint.com/countrylistings/northamerica/usa/georgewbush.aspx?site=google&adname=presbush&ad=gbush1022

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:36 PM

oh, bushh wil win...
|
|
|
AND

THARS

NOT A

GODAM THING

U CAN

DO ABOUT

IT!

>:[

Posted by: MonsterFace at September 14, 2004 10:36 PM

Fred Armisen is co-hosting tomorrow. Last time he was on he was trying visual humor on the radio. It didn't go over that well. I hope he does a better job.

Posted by: Mel [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:37 PM

For this reason I submit to you the following acts of impeachment againts George Bush, which I obtained from www.votetoimpeach.org. Check it out.

Open your mind and help regular citizens like me to restore justice. If you can't lend a hand then get out of the way.

Articles of Impeachment

of

President George W. Bush

and

Vice President Richard B. Cheney,
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and
Attorney General John David Ashcroft

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from
Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and
Misdemeanors. - - ARTICLE II, SECTION 4 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald H.
Rumsfeld, and Attorney General John David Ashcroft have committed violations and
subversions of the Constitution of the United States of America in an attempt to carry out with
impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes and deprivations of the civil rights
of the people of the United States and other nations, by assuming powers of an imperial
executive unaccountable to law and usurping powers of the Congress, the Judiciary and those
reserved to the people of the United States, by the following acts:

1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law;
carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting
in the death and maiming of tens of thousands of Iraqis, and hundreds of U.S. G.I.s.

2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.

3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and
locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.

viva free speech'1!1!1!1!1

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:38 PM

~~~ Fishgrease; if you don't talk about the dead
then nobody died ~~~

But why isn't Air America reporting each increase in the number of US Soldiers killed in Iraq from this website...

http://icasualties.org/oif/

... a website I learned of ON Air America?

Is it something systemic?

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 14, 2004 10:38 PM

Bush ain't been in the White House for weeks now. "Hello,...anyone home??"

Posted by: RomanDolly at September 14, 2004 10:39 PM

Iraq: a descent into civil war?

Luke Harding in Baghdad
Wednesday September 15, 2004
The Guardian
Lying amid the debris strewn near Al-Karkh police station was the photo of a young man in a blue T-shirt. The passport snap had been part of his application to join Iraq's police force.
Yesterday, however, he and dozens of other recruits queueing outside the station in central Baghdad were blown to pieces by a car bomb. Near the photo, someone had heaped the shoes of the dead and injured into a neat pile.

The destruction from the suspected suicide blast which killed 47 people and injured 114 was everywhere: bits of metal, glass, a broken billiard table, a dead bird and pools of blood.

There was nothing left of the recruit in the photo.

"The bomb went off at 10am. A lot of people were queueing up to join the police," said Allah Hamas, 31, who owns Allah's Famous Falafel Stand, next to the police station.

"I handed a customer a sandwich. Suddenly there was an explosion and a piece of metal ripped off the top of his head.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1304852,00.html

Posted by: tonid at September 14, 2004 10:39 PM

"You worthless no name slob of course rebuild over there. much better than more mass funerals in this country from ragheads like in sep 2001 Imagine the bawlin' you people would be doing if Bush hadn't of taken action then later sadass would have hit us with anthrax. you would now be blaming bush for not taking preventative action. you can't have it both ways dumb ass"

Oooo, looky at the poutyman, making pottywords because he's dun gone an' got CAUGHT with WEASLE SHIT on his peckerstub!

Far from nameless, I'm SO well known, I don't BOTHER with signing things. Funny you'd bitch about it, what with you having no nick, and NOT being knon.

ASK AROUND, peesnot. ASK the nice blogger who I am, and what I do.

I AM HERE TO *HELP* YOU.

Expect it to hurt.

Now, let's review your white supremacist diatribe, ok my wee pissy neonazi bitchkinder?

Sadam didn't hit us withg anthrax, that was someone just like YOU. Were all you neocunts born afraid, or did your mommies beat that into you?

My guess is that dressing you up like a boy when you were a small child has scarred you for life. The real solution to end this terror is for you to hunt that bad mean ol' mommy of yours and CASH THAT NASTY TRAILER PARK BITCH'S FINAL TICKET!

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:39 PM

wanda ... what was the scientific topic of which you speak?
Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:33 PM //

the one I note: GMO and the big nothing on AZT.

stem cell research also is viewed strickly as political talking point.

main point: need to at least do due diligence to get the big picture right and ask basic questions before going all over the place.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:39 PM

Allah's Famous Falafel Stand.-

allahfalafel

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:41 PM

otherwise she sounds like a medieval astrologer trying to explain star movements in the middle of cosmology conference. She is 400 yrs too late. Even Plato will chuckle listening JG shrieking about why a leader is doing this or that.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:32 PM

To view things from a philosophical standpoint, one has to be objective. Unfortunately, that's not a strong point for Janeane. I honestly can't think of one instance in which Janeane tried to look at the election from a Bush supporter's point of view. I know it's hard to believe, but they are not all insane.

Posted by: W@W at September 14, 2004 10:41 PM

Even Plato will chuckle listening JG shrieking about why a leader is doing this or that.
Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:32 PM

But wanda ... billions of people still believe in astrology ... JG's not behind the times ... she's in them!

I realize that its tempting to assert stuff like intellectual discourse and shit ... but that stuff just don't sell for entertainment. Besides, I would stack up JG's ideas against most people who hold power on this planet. Seriously, think about it.

So ... what are your impressions of Jerry Springer?

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:41 PM

9/11 widows join Kerry campaign

Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington
Wednesday September 15, 2004
The Guardian

Prominent widows of the September 11 2001 terror attacks endorsed John Kerry's run for the presidency yesterday, accusing George Bush of betrayal and of leading the country into a state of permanent war.
"The truth is, after watching the Republican convention in New York, I am scared. I am scared of the mentality," said Kirsten Breitweiser, the most celebrated of the self-styled Jersey Girls, four widows who led a dogged campaign to force the Bush administration to establish an independent investigation into the attacks.

Yesterday's endorsement by five women who lost their husbands in the World Trade Centre, and a survivor of the attack on the Pentagon, was designed to reassure a doubting US public that Mr Kerry could be relied on to keep the country safe.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1304878,00.html

Posted by: tonid at September 14, 2004 10:41 PM

aw i feel awful

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:42 PM

osted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:27 PM
Janeane tends to view anyone with a different opinion from hers as having a charactor defect. That's not pop psychology, that's just arrogance.

Posted by: W@W at September 14, 2004 10:36 PM //

Sometimes that 'different opinion' could very well be wrong. (etichally, scientifically, politically, whatever)

the question is: why she thinks is wrong? Is that 'why', the analitical process correct? can we check it?

See this is THE VERY basis of responsible politics. It has to be transparent.

That is also why Bush never show his work, and just say 'trust' me, and those no sayer bastard are wrong.

SHOW the work, show the theory and analytical tool being used. If it is far edge theory, tell audiance so everybody can check it.

It's tranparency.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:44 PM

the one I note: GMO .... before going all over the place.
Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:39 PM

Perhaps ... although I think putting the brakes on GMO (even without evidence to suggest it is dangerous) is a really good idea. It just "feels" wrong to cross a potato with a moth.

I'll bet my intuition against every republican scientist on the planet.

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:46 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosh_Hashanah

Posted by: LetTheGoodTimesRoll at September 14, 2004 10:46 PM

>>Can someone tell me what "trackback pings" means?

No problem. A trackback ping is a table tennis term for a backhanded serve.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 10:47 PM

Bush's brother at centre of row over Nader nomination on Florida ballot

Julian Borger in Washington
Wednesday September 15, 2004
The Guardian

Florida and Jeb Bush, the president's brother, were once more at the centre of a legal row over the presidential election yesterday, after Governor Bush's administration intervened to ensure Ralph Nader was on the state ballot.
Florida Democrats, fearing Mr Nader will take votes away from them, accused the state government of flouting a court order last Wednesday that removed the third party candidate and veteran consumer activist from the ballot, on the grounds that the group sponsoring him, the Reform party, was not a nationally recognised party.

Mr Nader's lawyers challenged the verdict but his name remained off the state ballot pending the appeal. However, Governor Bush's secretary of state, Glenda Hood, has stepped in and submitted her own appeal which automatically suspended the court order, putting Mr Nader back in the running just in time for absentee ballots to be posted to 50,000 US soldiers and other overseas voters by a Saturday deadline.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1304899,00.html

Posted by: tonid at September 14, 2004 10:47 PM

"To view things from a philosophical standpoint, one has to be objective."

One must *attempt* to be objective. To require actually *being* objective demands a stipulation to objectivism, which isn't a scientific reality. Heisenberg won't let us do that. Attempts at objectivism end up devolving to are usually little more than a mutual admiration society and taffy pull circle jerk. The delusions of the group are no more real than individual delusions, they're just more dangerous.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:48 PM

Hi Nik E,
Just got on the blog a bit ago myself. Missed the show again so the other bloggers have to tell us what we missed.

Posted by: tonid at September 14, 2004 10:49 PM

">>Can someone tell me what "trackback pings" means?

No problem. A trackback ping is a table tennis term for a backhanded serve."

As apposed to a pong, a forwardhanded serve.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:49 PM

It's tranparency.
Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:44 PM

That'd be nice! I've even ranted about it ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:50 PM

Is it something systemic?
Posted by: Fishgrease at September 14, 2004 10:38 PM

I think Sam said something about the death
and distruction in Iraq tonight so did
Crowley, he mentioned how the Iraq power
grid got whacked today.

So, I don't know, let CNN give us the running
body count, the worthless sacks of shit.

Well, those of us here on the MR blog
will talk about it, we'll talk about
the dead so at least someone besides
their grief sick families knows they
died.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:50 PM

I realize that its tempting to assert stuff like intellectual discourse and shit ... but that stuff just don't sell for entertainment. Besides, I would stack up JG's ideas against most people who hold power on this planet. Seriously, think about it.
Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:41 PM

just because there are billions of stupid people doesn't mean you ought to be stupid too. The informations are out there, philosopher has been struggling to ask the same questions as Jeanine did (why do people do what they do?)

I am not saying she ought to quit being funny or be a total bore. But I am pointing out there is a serious weekness in her way of thinking and analysing event/history. And it shows (the Che's interview)

It has nothign to do with comedy or not being entertaining. (unless your idea of being entertaining is being uninformed)

So ... what are your impressions of Jerry Springer?
Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:41 PM //

Interesting TV show, pretty savvy political player. He is a smart person.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:51 PM

A Daily Look at U.S. Iraq Military Deaths

Wednesday September 15, 2004 2:46 AM


By The Associated Press

As of Tuesday, Sept. 14, 1,018 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of military operations in Iraq in March 2003, according to the Defense Department. Of those, 768 died as a result of hostile action and 250 died of non-hostile causes. The figures include three military civilians.

The British military has reported 65 deaths; Italy, 18; Poland, 13; Spain, 11; Bulgaria, six; Ukraine, six; Slovakia, three; Thailand, two; and Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia and the Netherlands have reported one death each.

Since May 1, 2003, when President Bush declared that major combat operations in Iraq had ended, 877 U.S. military members have died - 656 as a result of hostile action and 221 of non-hostile causes, according to the military's numbers Tuesday.

Since the start of U.S. military operations in Iraq, 7,245 U.S. service members have been wounded in hostile action, according to the Defense Department's weekly tally.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4495406,00.html

Posted by: tonid at September 14, 2004 10:51 PM

"aw i feel awful"

no you don't.


you died three weeks ago.


shut the fuck up.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:51 PM

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/09/15/nsinn15.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/09/15/ixhome.html

i still submit that this is an interesting story.

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:52 PM

>>~President Bush, your administration maintains that outsourcing is good for America and actually creates jobs in our country. Please explain why the data shows the opposite.~

You sound like an economic-girlie-man

Posted by: Govenor Terminator at September 14, 2004 10:52 PM

Far from nameless, I'm SO well known, I don't BOTHER with signing things. Funny you'd bitch about it, what with you having no nick, and NOT being knon.

Posted by: at September 14

Excuse me, I should have knon you are Mr. Dickhead, of course. Tell me, Mr. Dickhead, what did your post have to do with fighting terrorism on our ground or on foreign shores?

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:52 PM

bloggers have to tell us what we missed.
Posted by: tonid at September 14, 2004 10:49 PM

I'm waiting for it to show up on AirAmericaPlace ... till then ... I dub you the official "Blog Mistress of Link Posting"! I just love when you show up!

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:52 PM

One must *attempt* to be objective.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:48 PM

Point taken.

My def of objectivity is the ability to see things without the interests of our vanity getting in the way.

Posted by: W@W at September 14, 2004 10:54 PM

Off topic.. anyone have a favorite site for airline tickets?

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 10:54 PM

c'mon there nonic,
c'mon out...

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:55 PM

- Mr. President, I'm not saying you are equal to God as an idol, but you are a god-like figure as a leader to the people of the US. -

Posted by: cat illist at September 14, 2004 10:31 PM
======================
THIS IS SICK.
(Aside from the fawning goo of this letter, given the author's religiosity, it is worth noting that the First Commandment abolishes idolatry: thus, the phrase, "not saying you are equal to God as an idol", is repellant in the context of the Judeo-Christian ethos.)

[... in an attempt to maintain the interior logic of the Theocratic NumbSkull Society.]

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 10:55 PM

Interesting TV show, pretty savvy political player. He is a smart person.
Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:51 PM

First off ... seems you just like raggin on JG ... come on admit it ... you enjoy it ... second ... Jerry is a fine example of wallowing in and imo perpetuating ignorance ... nay I say he encourages and increases it!

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:55 PM

1150 09/14/04 NAME NOT RELEASED YET Not reported yet U.S. Army Task Force Olympia Hostile - hostile fire Mosul (western part) Not reported yet Not reported yet US

1149 09/13/04 Weisenburg, David Staff Sergeant 26 U.S. Army National Guard B Co., 2nd Battalion, 162nd Infantry Regiment Hostile - hostile fire Taji (near) [NW of Baghdad] Portland Oregon US

1148 09/13/04 Isenberg, Benjamin Specialist 27 U.S. Army National Guard B Co., 2nd Battalion, 162nd Infantry Regiment Hostile - hostile fire Taji (near) [NW of Baghdad] Sheridan Oregon US

1147 09/13/04 Machado-Olmos, Cesar F. Lance Corporal 20 U.S. Marine 2nd Combat Engr. Bat., 2nd Mar. Div., II Mar. Exped. Force Non-hostile - vehicle accident Al Anbar Province Spanish Fork Utah US

1146 09/12/04 Poindexter, Jason T. Private 1st Class 20 U.S. Marine 2nd Bat., 5th Marines, 1st Marine Div., I Mar. Exped. Force Hostile - hostile fire Al Anbar Province San Angelo Texas US

1145 09/12/04 Wetherbee, Alexander E. 1st Lieutenant 27 U.S. Marine 3rd Assault Amphib. Bat., 1st Mar. Div., I Mar. Exped. Force Hostile - hostile fire Al Anbar Province Fairfax Virginia US

1144 09/12/04 Nosek, Grzegorz Private 1st Class 28 Polish Army 16th Air Assault Battalion, 6th Air Assault Brigade Hostile - hostile fire Al Hillah (4 mi. E of) Olkusz Poland POL

1143 09/12/04 Rózynski, Daniel 2nd Lieutenant 24 Polish Army 16th Air Assault Battalion, 6th Air Assault Brigade Hostile - hostile fire Al Hillah (4 mi. E of) Gdansk Poland POL

1142 09/12/04 Mazurek, Piotr 2nd Lieutenant 25 Polish Army 15th Engineers Battalion Hostile - hostile fire Al Hillah (4 mi. E of) Niemstów (nr. Cieszanów) Poland POL

1141 09/11/04 Cedergren, David A. Petty Officer 3rd Class 25 U.S. Navy 2nd Marine Division, Fleet Marine Forces Atlantic Non-hostile - unspecified cause Iskandariyah (near) South St. Paul Minnesota US

1140 09/10/04 Jones, Stephen Fusilier 22 British Army A Company, 1st Battalion, The Royal Welch Fusiliers Non-hostile - vehicle accident Al Amarah (S of) Denbigh Wales UK

1139 09/08/04 Sparks, Jason L. Private 1st Class 19 U.S.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:56 PM

1139 09/08/04 Sparks, Jason L. Private 1st Class 19 U.S. Army 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment Hostile - hostile fire Fallujah Monroeville Ohio US

1138 09/08/04 Martinez, Michael A. Specialist 29 U.S. Army 1st Bat., 6th Field Artillery Reg., 1st Infantry Div. Non-hostile - vehicle accident Baqubah (near) Juan Diaz Puerto Rico US

1137 09/08/04 Faulkner, James Daniel Sergeant 23 U.S. Army 20th Engineer Battalion, 1st Cavalry Division Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack Baghdad (eastern part) Clarksville Indiana US

1136 09/08/04 NAME NOT RELEASED YET Not reported yet U.S. Army 13th Corps Support Command Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack Balad (near) Not reported yet Not reported yet US

1135 09/07/04 Drake, Chad H. Specialist 23 U.S. Army 1st Bat., 82nd Field Artillery Regiment, 1st Cavalry Div. Hostile - hostile fire Baghdad (eastern part) Garland Texas US

1134 09/07/04 Price, Timothy E. 1st Lieutenant 25 U.S. Army 127th Mil. Police Co., 709th MP Bat., 18th MP Brig., V Corps Hostile - hostile fire Baghdad (western part) Midlothian Virginia US

1133 09/07/04 Aneiros, Yoe M. Specialist 20 U.S. Army 2nd Bat., 70th Armored Reg., 1st Armored Div. Hostile - hostile fire - RPG attack Baghdad (Sadr City) Newark New Jersey US

1132 09/07/04 Adams III, Clarence Specialist 28 U.S. Army 91st Engineer Battalion, 1st Cavalry Division Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack Baghdad Richmond Virginia US

1131 09/06/04 Grella, Devin J. Private 1st Class 21 U.S. Army Reserve 706th Transportation Company

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:57 PM

http://www.expedia.com/Default.asp?CCheck=1&

Posted by: Ajax at September 14, 2004 10:57 PM

Off topic.. anyone have a favorite site for airline tickets?

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 10:54 PM

From what I've heard, Travelzoo.com has info on various offers and deals.

Posted by: W@W at September 14, 2004 10:57 PM

You sound like an economic-girlie-man

Posted by: Govenor Terminator
==============================
I just LOVE an economic-girlie-man. They are sooo in touch with their inner wallets.

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 10:57 PM

1131 09/06/04 Grella, Devin J. Private 1st Class 21 U.S. Army Reserve 706th Transportation Company

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 10:58 PM

Family stress nearly made Blair quit, claims Bragg

Michael White, political editor
Wednesday September 15, 2004
The Guardian

Tony Blair's spring wobble when he seriously considered stepping down as prime minister was driven by "personal and family" pressures, and not by the political controversies raging around him, an old friend suggested yesterday.

The Labour peer, Melvyn Bragg, whose wife, Cate Haste, co-authored Cherie Blair's new book on Downing Street spouses, made the claim during an interview with ITV News which caught No 10 on the hop.

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/labour/story/0,9061,1304778,00.html

Posted by: tonid at September 14, 2004 10:58 PM

not saying you are equal to God as an idol", is repellant in the context of the Judeo-Christian ethos.)-

thanks ilo.
what hypocrites y'know?

keep them coming fish.

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:58 PM

FEC Nixes Kerry Doc Ads


By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 9/13/2004 1:28:00 PM

Conservative lobby Citizens United will not get to buy local broadcast and cable ad time to promote or air a documentary attacking the Democratic presidential ticket.

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA452599?display=Breaking+News&referral=SUPP

Posted by: 13ben [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:59 PM

The Bush Administration's Top 40 Lies about War and Terrorism
Bring 'em On!

by Steve Perry
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0730-06.htm

Posted by: 13ben [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 10:59 PM

>>The British military has reported 65 deaths; Italy, 18; Poland, 13; Spain, 11; Bulgaria, six; Ukraine, six; Slovakia, three; Thailand, two; and Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia and the Netherlands have reported one death each.

Once again, the US is a world leader! Bush has led us to world prominance, if not world domination.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:01 PM

Lou Dobbs Has an ugly story on the worst carnage in months in Iraq.

Americans and Jews to blame

Posted by: pablo at September 14, 2004 11:03 PM

[... in an attempt to maintain the interior logic of the Theocratic NumbSkull Society.]

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 10:55 PM

Good point. I also imagine that Bush writes these letters himself. I really can't believe anything that he submits as truth, although I have no doubt there are sick people like this out there (Bush for one).


Wanda - why do you really hate Janeane so much and continue to listen? I agree that sometimes Janeane repeating the same over-simplified psychoanalysis is a little annoying, but not so much that it "ruins" the show....
... and W@W.. what gives? Thought you were a fan of JGs... seems like you suddenly did a 180...

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 11:03 PM

Off topic.. anyone have a favorite site for airline tickets?

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 10:54 PM

From what I've heard, Travelzoo.com has info on various offers and deals.

Posted by: W@W at September 14, 2004 10:57 PM

hotwire.com is good if you are flexible.

Posted by: Cocky-With-Christ at September 14, 2004 11:04 PM

Americans and Jews to blame
Posted by: pablo at September 14, 2004 11:03 PM

Jesus H Christ!

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:04 PM

First off ... seems you just like raggin on JG ... come on admit it ... you enjoy it ... second ... Jerry is a fine example of wallowing in and imo perpetuating ignorance ... nay I say he encourages and increases it!
Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 10:55 PM //

of course I am into the show. why do you think I am posting here. Otherwise I would have just skipped the whole thing. Why am I raggin? Because JG has the ability to do serious work on some area (talking about show biz/80's TV) but on other area (reading news and contextualizing it) she can be seriously bad. They both aren't that different, why the big discrepancy? She can talk intelligently about show biz connecting people/events/pointing important works/significant turning point/process/etc...


Jerry? I think there is exploitation element to it. but I only watch a couple of his show. So.. don't know much beyond that.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 11:04 PM

- what hypocrites y'know? -

Dear cat illist,

As bad as hypocrisy is, I think these people are even more frightening: hypocrisy - I think - even requires a couple of brain cells, while these people, frankly, suffer some type of ethical autism. Since they are ill, I should forgive them; still, I do find them more frightening in a way.
>:(

*PS> I'm still miffed at chubby_bubba from last nite - so I must ask: are you my blogging friend, Cathy in Seattle; or are you another?

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 11:06 PM

i submit that the aw i feel awful joke based on Allah Falafel is no different than the woman idolizing bush.

i do not think it's grounds for me to shut the fuck up.

so i wont.
catfische?

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 11:06 PM

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/09/15/nsinn15.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/09/15/ixhome.html

i still submit that this is an interesting story.

Posted by: cat illist at September 14, 2004 10:52 PM


It is *my* contention that you are correct.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:06 PM

http://www.airgorilla.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by: 13ben [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 11:06 PM

>I'm still miffed at chubby_bubba from last nite

what did I do to upset you?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:08 PM

Catharine:

- I also imagine that Bush writes these letters himself. -

Yes, I do, too. And I see him using one of those extra-large diameter crayolas, holding it firmly in his fist, with his tongue curled out over his upper lip to maintain his balance.

:)

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 11:08 PM

here's one for the freepers......if they got facts, then TAKE THE MONEY!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Group offers $50,000 for proof of Bush service
Tuesday, September 14, 2004 Posted: 3:33 PM EDT (1933 GMT)

(CNN) -- The founder of the group Texans for
Truth said Tuesday that he is offering $50,000 to
anyone who can prove President Bush fulfilled his
service requirements, including required duties
and drills, in the Alabama Air National Guard in
1972.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/14/bush.texans/index.html

Posted by: 13ben [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 11:10 PM

i am not catsea,
tho sometimes i wish to be,
nor the sweet cat chew,
or sneezy like achoo.

actually i just had a momentary lapse of reasoning when i made my typekey and thought this song title of mine would be a good nic. forgot about all the crrrrrrazzzy fine felines already roaming the halls of the blog.
i'll post as normal if it'll make you feel less miffed.

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 11:11 PM

The argument is based on a compounded fallacy, and is thus a misleading question. It's like asking if you've ever been caught fucking weasels. Ask bullshit questions, get bullshit answers.

Answar Al Islam was fighting against Sadam, not with him. They were the only terrorist group operating out of Iraq. Sadam gave money to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers - the Palestinians have never attacked the US, and have always tried to maintain diplomatic relations with the US. Prior to our illegal occupation of that country, there were no terrorists in Iraq who were a problem to anyone but Sadam and the Kurds.

Like many Americans, you've apparently determined that all middle eastern people are "towelheads".

Just say "I'm a racist, I suffer from the anxiety disorder known as xenophobia, and I'd rather wax macho about it and pout like a monkeyboy than face my illness. People who're different from me scare me and that makes me mad. People who aren't like me invalidate me and make me feel lonely and bad so I hate them. Darn brown raghead sand nigger evil doing beheadist freedom haters make my butt twitch, and I will declare JIHAD upon them because I'm a pissant".

then shut the fuck up, you sick sick sick little primate.

Unless, of course, you'd care to defend your advocacy of the anal rape, torture, and murder of small children in the prisons of Iraq? What's up with the pro forced man-boy sex stance of the GOP these days? Why is it wrong for gays to marry or have anal sex, but it's ok to assrape little boys?
If you can explain THAT, you poor broken person, then go right ahead.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:12 PM

Bumper Sticker Insubordination
A Kerry fan gets fired, and then hired, for her politics.
By Timothy Noah
Posted Tuesday, Sept. 14, 2004, at 3:30 PM PT


One of this column's various mandates is to keep track of people who get fired from their jobs solely for holding certain political beliefs. Firing a person because you don't like his or her politics runs contrary to just about everything this country stands for, but it is not against the law. My interest in this topic was stimulated a couple of years ago when I learned that my childhood friend Michael Italie, who sewed U.S. Navy jackets for Goodwill Industries in Miami, got fired for appearing on television as the mayoral candidate for the Socialist Workers Party, in which capacity he made some predictably provocative statements. Subsequently, I wrote about Bryan Keefer, who lost his job as a research assistant with the Service Employees International Union for writing an online column critical of the coinage, "Enron conservatives." In both of these examples, the extracurricular activities that caused offense were entirely unrelated to the fired person's job and were not performed, or even discussed, in the workplace.

http://slate.msn.com/id/2106714/

Posted by: tonid at September 14, 2004 11:12 PM

chubby_bubba:

I thought it wrong you posted as dr last night; and also, I DO NOT LIKE NO-NICS.
(I'm gonna be a bit confused by the blog anyways, but the nic-flipping and no-nicking makes me more crazy.)
You can understand that, no?

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 11:13 PM

wo nonic was that for me?

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 11:14 PM

13ben: I'm wondering, as a busines owner, how would you feel if the Gov't raised your business taxes in order to provide socialized medicine to all citizens?

what do you figure your break even point would be?

taxes raised by 3%? 5% 10%?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:14 PM

Wanda - why do you really hate Janeane so much and continue to listen? I agree that sometimes Janeane repeating the same over-simplified psychoanalysis is a little annoying, but not so much that it "ruins" the show....
Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 11:03 PM

Majority report is essentially a show about politics and news. Ability to analyse news and events is fundamental.

knowing the basic about history is essentials, otherwise MR can't contextualise information properly. Knowing philosophy is usefull, cause that's where the big heavy duty tools are. etc. etc...

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 11:14 PM

Like this:

"Posted by: at"

I'm not likely to even read whatever that (or those) person (or people) post(s).

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 11:14 PM

or is it just a F**ked up patrioter?

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 11:15 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/14/bush.texans/index.html

Posted by: 13ben at September 14, 2004 11:10 PM
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The wily Texans for Truth
know George's record is aloof
so they put up the bar
Fifty grand in your car
if you can bring them the proof!

Posted by: Scoopster_RI at September 14, 2004 11:16 PM

"Americans and Jews to blame"

Posted by: pablo at September 14, 2004 11:03 PM

Fuck you Pablo, I had nothing to do with it.

You are SUCH an asshole!

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:16 PM

What could this secret of the Demos be they just spoke of? I hope it's good.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:17 PM

I never posted as dr. I posted under the name DavidR under the mistaken impression it was an unused nic.

I've explained this numerous times.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:17 PM

Sorry if you've already seen this...but it is priceless...check out http://www.democraticunderground.com/top10/04/170.html...and note #10! Enjoy!

Posted by: Tanya at September 14, 2004 11:17 PM

Yes, I do, too. And I see him using one of those extra-large diameter crayolas, holding it firmly in his fist, with his tongue curled out over his upper lip to maintain his balance.

:)

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 11:08 PM

Hee hee.

I can so picture that!

I used to give my little brother crap for doing the tongue biting thing - when he was concentrating on something really easy.

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 11:18 PM

.. and W@W.. what gives? Thought you were a fan of JGs... seems like you suddenly did a 180...

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 11:03 PM

Sorry for slow reply. Made a deli run. UMMM Ice coffee.

Am I not allowed to offer an opinion that's not an ass kiss? Janeane has said on a number of occasions that people who still support George Bush at this point do so because of a charactor defect. I just feel this is a ridiculous statement. It doesn't mean I hate Janeane.

Posted by: W@W at September 14, 2004 11:18 PM

State Of The Union: Opposing the Patriot Act
By Timothy Egan
In Seattle


As the presidential election approaches, the BBC is broadcasting the reflections of commentators around the US. This week journalist and writer, Timothy Egan, tells of a town that has taken a

Listen, for example to Molly Gibbs:

"The Patriot Act is a tool to keep us in fear," she said, standing before the council in Tumwater, a small town in the far corner of the Pacific Northwest.

"We are losing our free speech, our right to privacy, our due process. It's all threatened by the Patriot Act."

Or listen to Robert Sand, who followed Molly Gibbs to the microphone:

"You people are hysterical," he said.

"All this talk of the Patriot Act taking away our civil liberties is ridiculous. Let the government do its job."

Posted by: tonid at September 14, 2004 11:19 PM

yea, when she says that she loses a lot of peoples attention.

Posted by: cat illist [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 11:19 PM

the Palestinians have never attacked the US, and have always tried to maintain diplomatic relations with the US.
Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:12 PM

This among other statements is pure bullshit ...
http://www.rangerjarhead.com/beirut.htm

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:19 PM

out of couriosity, how do you feel about the numerous people who coninously post w/no nic?

Seems to me you should be even angrier at them than you are at me.


At the absurdity, the utter arrogance, that we should a know one no nic from the rest...

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:19 PM

Sorry if you've already seen this...but it is priceless...check out http://www.democraticunderground.com/top10/04/170.html...and note #10! Enjoy!

Posted by: Tanya at September 14, 2004 11:17 PM
-=-=-=-=-=-
*BLEEDINGMOUTHFROMBITINGGUMSSPIT!*

Posted by: Scoopster_RI at September 14, 2004 11:19 PM

Statement by Doubleday (K.Kelly's Publisher)Regarding Kitty Kelley

NEW YORK, Sept. 13 /PRNewswire/ -- The following is a statement by Doubleday regarding Kitty Kelley:

In an appearance on the Today Show on Monday,
September 13, 2004, Sharon Bush repeated a denial
she made earlier last week.

After telling Kitty Kelley that she had knowledge
of President George W. Bush "doing cocaine" at
Camp David -- "not once, but many times," Mrs.
Bush now denies that statement.

This denial has already been utterly discredited
by a third party to the meeting at which Mrs.
Bush made the statements.

Doubleday and Kitty Kelley, author of "The
Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty,"
firmly uphold the accuracy and veracity of
reporting on this topic.

Further, Doubleday and Ms. Kelley affirm that
Mrs. Bush was read her comments on the day
following the meeting in a telephone
conversation, lasting over an hour, that was
witnessed by Random House Vice President Peter
Gethers -- that those comments included
her remarks on cocaine use at Camp David -- and
that she once again agreed that these comments
were true.

The following are undisputable facts:

-- Mrs. Bush confirmed that she was aware of cocaine use by President George W. Bush at Camp David when his father was President

-- Mrs. Bush confirmed that such usage occurred on more than one occasion

-- Mrs. Bush knew that Ms. Kelley planned on using this information in her book and was read the exact quotes that would be utilized

-- Mrs. Bush continued to have a good relationship with Kitty Kelley -- long after the meeting in April at which she confirmed the cocaine report

-- Mrs. Bush called Ms. Kelley in May, 2004 after which there was a friendly correspondence.

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/09-13-2004/0002249391&EDATE=

Posted by: 13ben [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 11:20 PM

"was that for me?"

Well, this IS the Cat Illist Blog, on planet Cat Illist, in the Cat Illist galaxy in the Cat Illist galactic supergroup in the Cat Illist universe in the Cat Illist multiverse in the Cat Illist dimensional strata in the Cat Illist omniverse paradigm, right? And you being Cat Illist, that would pretty much make EVERYTHING ALL ABOUT *YOU*, right?


nope.

it wasn't.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:22 PM

i'll post as normal if it'll make you feel less miffed.

Posted by: cat illist
=====================
You post how you wish; but, I'd be happier if at least you let out who you used to be ...

Also, I have been suffering under the illusion that Cat-Sea and Cat-Chew were the same person, no? And, for a long time I thought Catharine might be the same, but now I think she is a different individual.

Or, perhaps you are all the minions of Admiral Poindexter, and here I am pouring my little heart out. ...

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 11:23 PM

I wonder whatever happened to W's dealer? Remember Dan Quayle's dealer was sent up the river and denied release dispite being a model prisoner?

I suspect W's dealers are so entrenched in the CIA or gov't that they will never be exposed or come forward.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:24 PM

anyway, ilo, I'm sorry to have upset you.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:26 PM

Wanda - why do you really hate Janeane so much and continue to listen? I agree that sometimes Janeane repeating the same over-simplified psychoanalysis is a little annoying, but not so much that it "ruins" the show....
Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 11:03 PM

if you notice, MR ability to do follow up question in most area except intertainment biz is fairly weak. Most of the question are 'big' single question when interviewing.

that's why big interview rarely in the form of 'conversation' but a series of previously compiled questions.

It means, MR most of the time is running on basic inquiry mode, instead of assesment or contextualizing the interview. And item that should give significant hint of the big picture is left unexplored. It's because MR don't have the 'big pictures' handy in their head.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 11:26 PM

sometimes I feel I'm the only one here who apologizes.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:26 PM

Knowing philosophy is usefull, cause that's where the big heavy duty tools are. etc. etc...
Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 11:14 PM

I might suggest that no matter what you've studied or how well you know material ... someone else knows more and will think of you as an idiot ... its all natural ... And its quite unnecessary to criticize people for their lack of training, education, intellect or the like when in reality, they (and by they I mean JG and Sam) are having a positive influence and are doing a wonderful job ... As Jesus once said "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" ... or put another way ... "Let she who has never made statements without enough references to stand up to both academic and legal scrutiny, cast the first aspersion

ps. that was a pun

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:26 PM

Posted by: Tanya at September 14, 2004 11:17 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#10 Bill O'Reilly
And finally, Bill O'Reilly fell for the oldest
trick in the book last week when an anonymous
jokester emailed him to criticize Fox for
interviewing DNC chief Terry McAuliffe during
both the Republican and Democratic National
Conventions. Apparently Bill didn't notice that
he was responding to a Mr. "Jack Mehoffer" who
hailed from, of all places, Springfield - home of
notorious prank caller Bart Simpson.

Bill proceeded to bloviate about how Fair and
Balanced Fox is. "Well, right you are, Mr.
Mehoffer. Newt Gingrich appeared with us at both
conventions. So did Mr. McAuliffe. What's the
beef, sir? It is long past time to stop the
partisan nonsense. Fox News gives airtime to all
responsible viewpoints." Be on the look out for
future emails from Amanda Hugenkiss, Ivana
Tinkle, and Hugh Jass. See you next week!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by: 13ben [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2004 11:27 PM

"Janeane has said on a number of occasions that people who still support George Bush at this point do so because of a charactor defect."

hi.

you don't consider willful ignorance a character defect?

Posted by: long dark (and stormy) night of the shadow of the JIK at September 14, 2004 11:28 PM

sometimes I feel I'm the only one here who apologizes.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:26 PM

Don't worry Chubby
I stick my foot in my mouth a lot
and so I apologize a lot, too.

It happens

Posted by: Conbo at September 14, 2004 11:28 PM

yes this is the catalyst blog.
anyone whos been around a little while knows.

ilo i post under...écrasez l'infâme, akaja, ja
cat illist, ummmm... many others
mostly to trick the trolls into thinking theres a million posters here.

i believe catsea and catchew(cashews)sneezy
are different people.

we get nicknames over time you know?

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:28 PM

Well - I think you ARE the only person on the blog who apologizes, Chubby. But, a few others have also apologized on occasion, using different nics, of course, but I suspect they are you.

tee hee
--> ok ok ok ok?

- kisskiss -

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 11:29 PM

sometimes I feel I'm the only one here who apologizes.
Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:26 PM

I'm sorry that you are the only one who apologizes. There! Happy now?

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:30 PM

n catherine is a whole other person as well.
i think.

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:31 PM

mostly to trick the trolls into thinking theres a million posters here.
Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:28 PM

You sneaky bastard!

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:32 PM

hey, Nik E Poo, Your alright by me. You make some very insightful posts.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:32 PM

you don't consider willful ignorance a character defect?

Posted by: long dark (and stormy) night of the shadow of the JIK at September 14, 2004 11:28 PM

It works both ways. Janeane is against the war, John Kerry supports it. Janeane is against the death penalty, John Kerry supports it. Yet Janeane supports John Kerry.

Posted by: W@W at September 14, 2004 11:33 PM

we get nicknames over time you know?

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:28 PM
++++++++++++++
And I was silly enough to start blogging using my real name ... but, if I use a different nic each evening, why would anyone ever say "hello" to me?
PLUS - using a consistent nic helps me know, Oh, this is the smart one, this is the nice one, this is the puky troll - and I read what I want.

Sometimes the no-nics start to argue among themselves, and I can't tell if there are two of them, or a dozen. Makes my head hurt!

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 11:34 PM

I might suggest that no matter what you've studied or how well you know material ...
Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:26 PM //

move upward from gradeschool level of analysis to somewhere slightly more informed.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 11:34 PM

"It works both ways. Janeane is against the war, John Kerry supports it. Janeane is against the death penalty, John Kerry supports it. Yet Janeane supports John Kerry."

Wrong, Kerry does not support the death penalty.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:35 PM

hey, Nik E Poo, Your alright by me. You make some very insightful posts.
Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:32 PM

huh?
[nik fumbles around in the dark ... waving hands in front of him]
I can't see you! ...
[nik trips on a dog chew toy and swears]
hello? who's there?

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:35 PM

ja is my real name n it's what i started with.
along with a pro-nader rant that sent nobody and fish after me like hyena's. jim bouyed my spirits tho' and now its home.

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:35 PM

Wrong, Kerry does not support the death penalty.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:35 PM

No. You're wrong. John Kerry supports the death penalty in the case of terrorists.

Posted by: W@W at September 14, 2004 11:36 PM

I am one sorry muthah fukker

Posted by: chubby_bubba the sorry muthah fukker at September 14, 2004 11:37 PM

Am I not allowed to offer an opinion that's not an ass kiss? Janeane has said on a number of occasions that people who still support George Bush at this point do so because of a charactor defect. I just feel this is a ridiculous statement. It doesn't mean I hate Janeane.

Posted by: W@W at September 14, 2004 11:18 PM

Fair enough. Although there is something to the idea that many of those who support Bush do so because something in their psychological makeup does not allow them to see evidence against him that is right there in front of their eyes. I can think of so many examples of this. There is also a strong tendency for these people to vote for the man simply because they are a "member of the club"... etc. etc. What would you call it? Doesn't mean non-Repubs don't have psychological problems of their own.. or even the same ones... we all have biases ... but I do marvel at how powerful the mind is... we can program ourselves to see anything we want to ... usually out of fear...

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 11:38 PM

Forever Jung

By JOSEPH GALLIVAN

...“Jung thought speed was evil. … Modern culture wants to disconnect you from yourself, wants you to be part of a herd. The big difficulty is in the individual and the collective. You can’t live without the collective, we’re dependent on each other, but if you lose yourself in the collective you no longer have yourself.”

read entire article here:
http://www.portlandtribune.com/archview.cgi?id=25701

Posted by: Conbo at September 14, 2004 11:38 PM

I can't tell if there are two of them, or a dozen. Makes my head hurt!--

or just one.

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:38 PM

move upward from gradeschool level of analysis to somewhere slightly more informed.
Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 11:34 PM

Was that supposed to be imperative, elucidatory or adjuration?

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:39 PM

pro-nader rant that sent nobody and fish after me like hyena's
Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:35 PM

hehe ... nice visual ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:41 PM

>>and so I apologize a lot, too.

Yes, but you do it because you are responsible and emotional mature.

Experts can't determine just why I 'm compelled to do it


Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:41 PM

Fair enough. Although there is something to the idea that many of those who support Bush do so because something in their psychological makeup does not allow them to see evidence against him that is right there in front of their eyes. I can think of so many examples of this. There is also a strong tendency for these people to vote for the man simply because they are a "member of the club"... etc. etc. What would you call it? Doesn't mean non-Repubs don't have psychological problems of their own.. or even the same ones... we all have biases ... but I do marvel at how powerful the mind is... we can program ourselves to see anything we want to ... usually out of fear...

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 11:38 PM
_________________________________________________
That's a very wise, Catherine
I agree, there is a certain amount of political
affiliation based on blind prejudice and nothing
more

Posted by: Conbo at September 14, 2004 11:42 PM

"No. You're wrong. John Kerry supports the death penalty in the case of terrorists."

Now that is an important distiction that you should have made. Not to do so is quite distorting. If kerry had it his way, there would be, say, 98%-99% less state sanctioned murders than if Bush had it his way. Thank you

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:42 PM

And its quite unnecessary to criticize people for their lack of training, education, intellect or the like when in reality, they (and by they I mean JG and Sam) are having a positive influence and are doing a wonderful job ... As Jesus once said "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" ... or put another way ... "Let she who has never made statements without enough references to stand up to both academic and legal scrutiny, cast the first aspersion

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:26 PM

It's a question of informing oneself of major ideas and significant work.

We can talk about Jesus does this or that in the bible, but not informing oneself a little of physics won't help understanding why Global warming happens. etc...

see my point yet? informing oneself of basic ideas are important, otherwise we keep comitting same mistake (eg. since bible doesn't say anything about global warming, then it must not exist)

anecdotal: not informing oneself about hegel will result not knowing 'historical process' as viewed by various school of thought, including the neocon. The result: JG will see neocon as 'character defect'/pop psychology babbling instead of an off shot of a school of thought or a philosohpical experiment gone wrong.

etc. etc...

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 11:44 PM

your welcome?

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:46 PM



All messages are published with permission of the sender. The general topic of this message is Children/Families:


Subject:
You're the man to fill the shoes no other can, except God...

To:
President George Bush

September 14, 2004

Mr. President, I'm not saying you are equal to God as an idol, but you are a god-like figure as a leader to the people of the US 9(blah, blah, blah).

#####

what is this, a child's letter to God? Such drivel.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:46 PM

Was that supposed to be imperative, elucidatory or adjuration?
Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:39 PM

I would say it's imperative.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 11:48 PM

Dear God,
In Sunday School they told us what You do. Who does it when
You are on vacation? - Jane 8 years old

Dear God,
I think about You sometimes even when I'm not praying.
-Elliot 8 years old

Dear God, Did You really mean "do unto others as they do unto you?"
Because if you did, then I'm going to fix my brother.
- Darla 8 years old

Dear God,
I didn't think orange went with purple until I saw the
sunset You made on Tuesday. - Margret 7years old

Dear God,
I read the Bible. What does "begat" mean? Nobody will
tell me. - Love, Allison 8 years old

Dear God,
Are you really invisible or is that a trick?
- Lucy 7 years old

Dear God,
Is it true my father won't get in Heaven if he uses his
bowling words in the house? - Anita 8 years old

Dear God,
Did you mean for the giraffe to look like that or was it
an accident? - Norma, 6 years old

Dear God,
Instead of letting people die and having to make new
ones, why don't You just keep the ones You have now?
- Jane, 7 years old

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:48 PM

I'm just wondering what God has to say about that. I suspect W won't like his place in Hell. Hell probably be shacked to a wall in the same wing as Hitler.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 14, 2004 11:49 PM

"No. You're wrong. John Kerry supports the death penalty in the case of terrorists."

Now that is an important distiction that you should have made. Not to do so is quite distorting. If kerry had it his way, there would be, say, 98%-99% less state sanctioned murders than if Bush had it his way. Thank you

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:42 PM

Sorry, I didn't know we were getting into *degrees of support*.

The reason Kerry doesn't support the death penalty is for fear that the wrong person will be convicted, not because he disagrees with the government killing people. One could say that the only difference between Bush and Kerry vis a vis the death penalty is that Bush has more faith in the judicial system.

Posted by: W@W at September 14, 2004 11:50 PM

Dear God,
If we come back as something - please don't let me be
Jennifer Horton because I hate her.
- Denise E., 7years old

Dear God,
My brother is a rat. You should give him a tail. Ha ha.
- Danny Mitchele., 7 years old

Dear God,
Maybe Cain and Abel would not kill each other so much if
they had their own rooms. It works with my brother.
- Larry P., 5 years old

enough

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:50 PM

Tabula rasa - n., pl. tabulae rasae [literally, smoothed or erased tablet] the mind in its hypothetical primary blank or empty state before receiving outside impressions; something existing in its original pristine state.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:50 PM

The result: JG will see neocon as 'character defect'/pop psychology babbling instead of an off shot of a school of thought or a philosohpical experiment gone wrong.
Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 11:44 PM

Fair enough ... but either way ... neocons are douche bags. So, JG is dead on with that little bit of analysis.

To get back to MY point ... I feel like you have this desire for an intellectual version of a penis measuring session with those around you ... credentials and education and classical training are great ... they are the means by which we expand knowledge and the horizons of civilization ... but this is not the purpose of the show ... MR is about communication, dialog, entertaining and stimulating curiosity for the political process ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 14, 2004 11:51 PM

"Janeane has said on a number of occasions that people who still support George Bush at this point do so because of a charactor defect. I just feel this is a ridiculous statement."

W@W
++++++++++++++
I went to middle school with a German boy who moved here with his family. His grandfather had been some kind of Nazi in Hitler's time. It seemed to me this boy felt a lot of shame for this; especially b/c lots of Jewish kids were in my school. I think probably the whole German society - even after more than 4 decades after WWII - felt a lot of shame for allowing the holocaust.

AND, I always wondered myself, "How could the German people do this? How could they? How?" Hitler? That's easy - Hitler was a madman. But the whole German society? How could it be? How could it happen?

Of course, we don't know where American history will lead us next. But one thing is, I have my answer. This is how it happened for the German people, this is how they were sucked into Hitler's madness. Will it be for us, too? Time will tell. But - I feel this society is conditioned just like the German people by Hitler.

--> W@W, of course, I have heard Janeane say things that made me, actually, cringe. This you quote, however, is not one of them.

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 11:51 PM

if you notice, MR ability to do follow up question in most area except intertainment biz is fairly weak. Most of the question are 'big' single question when interviewing.

that's why big interview rarely in the form of 'conversation' but a series of previously compiled questions.

It means, MR most of the time is running on basic inquiry mode, instead of assesment or contextualizing the interview. And item that should give significant hint of the big picture is left unexplored. It's because MR don't have the 'big pictures' handy in their head.


Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 11:26 PM

Well I really disagree with most of your assessments of their style, the idea that they don't contextualize, the idea that they don't do follow up, that they only do it in the area of entertainment... and I have honestly never felt you offered a very good alternative or assessment yourself... sorry, but... I guess we just differ. Again, why do you bother listening? Have you had radio or other similar experience yourself? We have all had our minor complaints, but yours are ongoing and unrelenting... Hey, you're allowed, but it just seems... tiresome.

Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 11:52 PM

"...anecdotal: not informing oneself about hegel will result not knowing 'historical process' as viewed by various school of thought, including the neocon...."

Wanda, now I fully agree with you here. But JG has a point about the state of the mind of Repubs, though I too believe she over plays it, but again I think you do under play her intelectual savy.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:52 PM

~otherwise we keep comitting same mistake (eg. since bible doesn't say anything about global warming, then it must not exist)~

i'm pretty sure it mentions the seas boiling? does that count?

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:53 PM

I've never used the name Cathy or Catharine or any variation.

I'm pretty sure Ja gave my nic a nic :) (Sneezy)

Posted by: Cat Shoo! at September 14, 2004 11:55 PM

Official Presidential Inaugural medallion
Design was personally approved by President George W. Bush!
Incredible high-relief design


http://www.govmint.com/countrylistings/northamerica/usa/georgewbush.aspx?site=google&adname=presbush&ad=gbush1022

sorry to beat a dead horse.

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:56 PM

hey der sneezy!!!

Posted by: ja at September 14, 2004 11:56 PM

"Americans and Jews to blame"

Posted by: pablo at September 14, 2004 11:03 PM

Fuck you Pablo, I had nothing to do with it.

You are SUCH an asshole!

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:16 PM

Check yourself.

Don't curse me. Go yell out your window at God or... That's what the Iraqis being interviewed on the show were saying about who the helicopter attackers were blowing up their houses and killing them.

Jews and Americans are to blame. Like it or not, they're right.


Posted by: pablo at September 14, 2004 11:58 PM

Hiya Ja! Tonight I'm a more Dopey/Sleepy.

Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:58 PM

Is bed wetting a problem for someone in your family? Bedwetting is a problem for thousands of people, all of whom are seeking answers and reaching out for help.

Click here to receive a FREE brochure "Bedwetting - What it's all about and how to end it".

Posted by: ja at September 15, 2004 12:00 AM

Wanda, now I fully agree with you here. But JG has a point about the state of the mind of Repubs, though I too believe she over plays it, but again I think you do under play her intelectual savy.
Posted by: at September 14, 2004 11:52 PM

of course there is place for psychoanalysis. But using it on EVERYTHING is just plain silly. It's intellectualism.

"All tools, each and any tool without exception, has its limitations. Everyone knows the old saw about the man with only a hammer sees everything as a nail. Yet, few of us are capable of objectively examining the tool in our own hands."

Posted by: wanda at September 15, 2004 12:00 AM

What would Jesus teach?

By Joshua Dwyer

...An individual's religious beliefs, whether they accept or deny the existence of God, should not preclude that person from teaching in schools built and sustained by taxpayers. Those same taxpayers should also have the freedom to influence the curricula in their local schools. Neither is the issue here. However, a systematic hostility toward Christianity and blatant endorsement of other religions like Humanism demands prompt attention and correction by offering equal access and representation in schools. Freedom of religion should not be interpreted by public schools as freedom of any religion except Christianity.

read entire article here:
http://www.thebatt.com/news/2004/09/14/Opinion/What-Would.Jesus.Teach-717788.shtml

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 12:00 AM

Yes... to whomever... I am separate from Cathy in Seattle (Cat Sea) and Cat Chew...

Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 12:00 AM

cat convergence.

Posted by: ja at September 15, 2004 12:01 AM

The

W

Stands

For

WarPig.

Posted by: George W. Bush at September 15, 2004 12:02 AM

Well I really disagree with most of your assessments of their style, the idea that they don't contextualize, the idea that they don't do follow up, that they only do it in the area of entertainment... and I have honestly never felt you offered a very good alternative or assessment yourself... sorry, but... I guess we just differ. Again, why do you bother listening? Have you had radio or other similar experience yourself? We have all had our minor complaints, but yours are ongoing and unrelenting... Hey, you're allowed, but it just seems... tiresome.
Posted by: Catharine at September 14, 2004 11:52 PM //

I quoted specific events and put out concrete way out of it. If you miss it, I am sorry about that.

Posted by: wanda at September 15, 2004 12:03 AM

--> W@W, of course, I have heard Janeane say things that made me, actually, cringe. This you quote, however, is not one of them.

Posted by: ilo at September 14, 2004 11:51 PM

You mean like referring to the Bush admin as the 43rd reich. I believe it was David Richey who was the first to point out the stupidity of this statement.

When you start making comparisons to Nazi Germany you better be ready to back them up. While the Bush admin is not breaking new ground vis a vis tolerance, Nazi analogies make our side sound shrill.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 12:03 AM

"
Sorry, I didn't know we were getting into *degrees of support*.

The reason Kerry doesn't support the death penalty is for fear that the wrong person will be convicted, not because he disagrees with the government killing people. One could say that the only difference between Bush and Kerry vis a vis the death penalty is that Bush has more faith in the judicial system."

Oh, but I do hope we are talking "degrees". Would you rather see 20,000 innocent Iraqi's die or 200. The only reason that (in my opinion) that he says he will kill terrorist is that the voterate is so conditioned that he couldn't get elected if he did not. I think it very bold that he has come out against the majority of exicutions.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:04 AM

Ok Catharine, that makes me happy. You are the once and future Catharine. And consistency is the hobgobblin that soothes ilo's breast. Thank you.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 12:04 AM

Yet, few of us are capable of objectively examining the tool in our own hands.
Posted by: wanda at September 15, 2004 12:00 AM

There you go again! ... Ok just measure, tell us and get it over with ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:07 AM

And consistency is the hobgobblin that soothes ilo's breast. Thank you.
Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 12:04 AM

No, thank you!

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:08 AM

There you go again! ... Ok just measure, tell us and get it over with ...
Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:07 AM\

...?

Posted by: wanda at September 15, 2004 12:09 AM

Line Blurring Between Dutch and Nazi Euthanasia
Warns Bioethicist in Rome

ROME, SEPT. 13, 2004 (Zenit.org).- The distance between the Dutch and Nazi practices of euthanasia has disappeared with the Netherlands' recent decision to allow infants and newborns to be put to death, warns a bioethicist.

read entire article here:
http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=58808

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 12:10 AM

Children's Letter to W:

Dear Mr. President.

When you are done with my mommy, can she come home?

Jimm P, age 5
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Dear Mr. President.

When you are done with my Daddy, will he walk again?

Julie age 8
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Dear Mr. President.

Is Saddam the Devil?

Tammy, age 4
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Dear Mr. President.

Would you please give my Daddy an economy? He hasn't had one since his job went to the Indians.

Lewis age 6
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Dear Mr. President.

Can Mommy and me go to Iraq to see Daddy, Mommy says it may be the last chance to see him.

Chester age 7
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Dear Mr. President.

Daddy says he lost his arms im Iraq. Could you look for them?

Wendell age 4
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Dear Mr. President.

I saw Afganistan on the map, but I couln't find Bin Laden. Can you show me where it is?

Lester age 8
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Dear Mr. President.

I love the Army! will there still be a war when I grow up?

Alphonse age 5
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Dear Mr. President.

Ever since Daddy came home from Iraq he beats up mommy. Is this becasue his experiences iwhile there have given him a nihlist world view? Or is it becasue he drinks nowwhiskey every day to forget seeing his friends blown ito a pink mist only feet away?

Mary age 8
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Dear Mr. President.

The Doctory says Daddy can't wake up because of a bomb took away half of a brain. Mommy says you have half of a brain, how come you are awake and daddy isn't?

Teddy age 8

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Dear Mr. President.

My Daddy came home in a box. Can we let him out, yet?

Julie age 3

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:10 AM

Jews and Americans are to blame. Like it or not, they're right.

Posted by: pablo at September 14, 2004 11:58 PM

Ilo,

This statement pretty much sums up why friends of mine (intelligent ones) who support Bush do so. They feel that liberals are so quick to jump on America and Israel, but these same liberals seem to give a pass to all the dictators and warlords of the world.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 12:10 AM

"When you start making comparisons to Nazi Germany you better be ready to back them up. While the Bush admin is not breaking new ground vis a vis tolerance, Nazi analogies make our side sound shrill."

I'll bet they said the same thing at the end of Weimar republic when Hitler was elected. The comparisons are striking. Read some history. We are repeating it, sadly.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:11 AM

...?
Posted by: wanda at September 15, 2004 12:09 AM

you not reading my posts? ... its easy ... search the blog for the word "penis" ... I like to throw one in every time I'm here ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:11 AM

"All tools, each and any tool without exception, has its limitations. Everyone knows the old saw about the man with only a hammer sees everything as a nail. Yet, few of us are capable of objectively examining the tool in our own hands."


Wanda, for the love of God, read your own quotes and apply them to yourself! I have read your "concrete example" but JG and SS will never be your mouthpieces. Thank God, in my opinion.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:12 AM

The dopier I am, the sleepier I am.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:12 AM

When you start making comparisons to Nazi Germany you better be ready to back them up. While the Bush admin is not breaking new ground vis a vis tolerance, Nazi analogies make our side sound shrill.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 12:03 AM

Truth is Truth, W@W
if the right was not pending on Naziesq, then
perhaps the analogies would not be made

Making a Memo that deliberately defends certain
aspects of out and out torture is inhumane, and
therefore Naziesq.

If people want to intrepit that as being shrill
then they are not understanding the severity of
the situation

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 12:13 AM

Right on, Conbo!

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:14 AM

You mean this...?

-JN (9/14): Same old same old..on and on and on..History just repeast.
- penchant to apply psychoanalysis when viewing event.
- (9/13): complete failure to comprehend che's role in political history. Unable to contextual Che's work in current political situation and the relevancy of the movie.

Solution:
- quickly update on big ideas and outline in the area of history and philosophy. get a quickie book such as 'The Oxford companion to philosophy.'

eg. ...for Hegel thought that history displays a rational process of development, and, by studying it, we can understand our own nature and place in the world. This idea of history having emaning can be interpreted as a reworking of the religious idea that the world was created by a being with some purpose in mind but it may also be understood in a more limited way, as a claim that history has a direction that we can discern, and is heading to a goal that we can welcome.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:16 PM


My feelings remain the same. She does sometimes miss ... or grate a bit, but you too need to work on how you come across.. as do we all. Reread what you wrote, with an objective eye (if you can - it's apparently not that easy), notice the mistakes, the non-sequiters, the tone, and the points not made... give her the same slack you would want.

Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 12:15 AM

the thing is,
hitler was the dictator, not a puppet.

dubya is a puppet.
closer to czar nicholas n rasputin

Posted by: ja at September 15, 2004 12:16 AM

Anyone who thinks Nazi Germany didn't start this way is self-deluded.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:16 AM

im dont think germany was a democracy was it?
did those people vote him in?
cause that might change my attitude a little.

Posted by: ja at September 15, 2004 12:18 AM

"the thing is,
hitler was the dictator, not a puppet.

dubya is a puppet.
closer to czar nicholas n rasputin"

Ok, Then I'm talking about the puppet masters...same thing.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:19 AM

why can't a dictator be a puppet?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:20 AM

GERMANY AND THE NEXT WAR
BY GENERAL FRIEDRICH VON BERNHARDI

TRANSLATED BY ALLEN H. POWLES

1912


All the patriotic sections of the German people were greatly excited
during the summer and autumn of 1911. The conviction lay heavy on all
hearts that in the settlement of the Morocco dispute no mere commercial
or colonial question of minor importance was being discussed, but that
the honour and future of the German nation were at stake. A deep rift
had opened between the feeling of the nation and the diplomatic action
of the Government. Public opinion, which was clearly in favour of
asserting ourselves, did not understand the dangers of our political
position, and the sacrifices which a boldly-outlined policy would have
demanded. I cannot say whether the nation, which undoubtedly in an
overwhelming majority would have gladly obeyed the call to arms, would
have been equally ready to bear permanent and heavy burdens of taxation.
Haggling about war contributions is as pronounced a characteristic of
the German Reichstag in modern Berlin as it was in medieval Regensburg.
These conditions have induced me to publish now the following pages,
which were partly written some time ago.

Nobody can fail to see that we have reached a crisis in our national and
political development. At such times it is necessary to be absolutely
clear on three points: the goals to be aimed at, the difficulties to be
surmounted, and the sacrifices to be made.

The task I have set myself is to discuss these matters, stripped of all
diplomatic disguise, as clearly and convincingly as possible. It is
obvious that this can only be done by taking a national point of view.

Our science, our literature, and the warlike achievements of our past,
have made me proudly conscious of belonging to a great civilized nation
which, in spite of all the weakness and mistakes of bygone days, must,
and assuredly will, win a glorious future; and it is out of the fulness
of my German heart that I have recorded my convictions. I believe that
thus I shall most effec

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:20 AM

Our science, our literature, and the warlike achievements of our past,
have made me proudly conscious of belonging to a great civilized nation
which, in spite of all the weakness and mistakes of bygone days, must,
and assuredly will, win a glorious future; and it is out of the fulness
of my German heart that I have recorded my convictions. I believe that
thus I shall most effectually rouse the national feeling in my readers'
hearts, and strengthen the national purpose.

THE AUTHOR.

_October, 1911_

http://www.gutenberg.net/etext/11352

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:21 AM

"im dont think germany was a democracy was it?
did those people vote him in?
cause that might change my attitude a little."

twice, Twice!

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:21 AM

im dont think germany was a democracy was it?

Yes, it was. he ws voted in.

how else could he go from obscurity to (near) world dominance?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:21 AM

im dont think germany was a democracy was it?
did those people vote him in?
cause that might change my attitude a little.

Posted by: ja at September 15, 2004 12:18 AM

I read the best book called the war against the
Jews.

Germany was a democracy!
Hitler got in through some underhanded flukes
and set about ripping to shreds the German Constitution, yes they did have one.

The first people to inhabit his death camps
were mentally ill Germans, and then his political
opponents, namely the communists and the liberals.

That kind of shut all other political opponents up. The movement was shoved underground-and also
I learned from this book that Hitler was exposed
by a Zionist movement that would not die. Maybe
Zionism has taken an odd turn since then, but they
were responsible for exposing Hitler's cruelties
to other countries, who in turn forced their leaders to deal with it.

Great book. Best I have read on the subject

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 12:23 AM

o.k. mebbe i didn't pay enough attention in 8th grade. sorry.
my mind is changed a little.

Posted by: ja at September 15, 2004 12:24 AM

While the Bush admin is not breaking new ground vis a vis tolerance, Nazi analogies make our side sound shrill.

Posted by: W@W
+++++++++++++++

Dear W@W,

Although I do understand your point, I do not believe I am shrill. I am, however, exremely WORRIED.

My worries stem from two lines of thought. I hope yu will please follow along:

1) The substantive rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights are found in the first 8 Amendments. Stated therein, the people are guaranteed 26 discrete right, and most of these rights are rserved for the criminally accused. Of these 26 discrete rights, at the minimum, fifteen have been grossly violated repeatedly. If this were not bad enough, given such a government that behaves in this manner, the people of the United States are for the most part, unmoved by these gross violations of our civil rights.

2) The voting base - as opposed to the base that actually benefits in real ways from the White House policies - is largely made up of persons who adhere to such political views represented HERE:

"I pray that You, O Lord will continually bring goodness and sweetness into the President’s life rather than sorrow, causing him to know that taking joy in You makes him strong. – Nehemiah 8:10

"I pray that the President will delight himself in You, Lord, knowing that You will give him the desires of his heart. – Psalm 37:4

http://praythevote.org/pray_scriptures.php

AND HERE:

"It's clear from these facts that Satan dictated the making of America and the founders of America were heathens and servants of Satan, who didn't truly value mankind's supreme responsibility to honor, obey and worship the true God above all else."

http://tencommandments.org/

... THIS IS SCARY TO ME ...

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 12:25 AM

Well Sinclair Broacasting is at is again. If you recall it is the right wing corporate media that refused to show Nightline's memorial of the fallen soldiers. Mark Hyman's, Sinclair's rabid, right wing nut job, and corporate communication's chief, is at it again. He is fiercely attacking Kerry's Military record and injuries. He is on 3 to 4 times a day. Here's a link to his diatribe:

http://www.newscentral.tv/thepoint/thepoint.shtml

The CEO of Sinclair is David Smith. If you remember, he was caught with a hooker. His email address is:

dsmith@sbgnet.com

Mr. Hyman's is:
mhyman@sbgnet.com

Posted by: edna ellen poe at September 15, 2004 12:26 AM

W@W -

Realistically, virtually none of the members of German society might have imagined Bergen-Belsen when Hitler first rose to power.

It is like the frog in the pot of water, and the water is brought to a slow boil. THE FROG DOESN'T NOTICE THE DANGER - AND BOILS.

Well, the heat is turning up ... it won't necessarily come to a boil ... BUT, democracy is not self-enforcing. If we sit idly by, and not recognize how dangerous these times truly are ...

Yes, I suspect we can become the new German people, who are later ashamed for not acting differently when we first should have.

If that sounds shrill to your ears, recall that even some, from the early days in the rise of Hitler, also, they werre probably called shrill in their day.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 12:30 AM

2Pe 2:17 These are springs without water, and mists driven by a storm; for whom the blackness of darkness hath been reserved.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:31 AM

http://tencommandments.org/
... THIS IS SCARY TO ME ...
Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 12:25 AM

I'll bet that 9 out of 10 Christians can't name 4 of the commandments ...

So, they are learning challenged ... thats why they want it posted up everywhere ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:32 AM

Jews and Americans are to blame. Like it or not, they're right.

Posted by: pablo at September 14, 2004 11:58 PM

Ilo,

This statement pretty much sums up why friends of mine (intelligent ones) who support Bush do so. They feel that liberals are so quick to jump on America and Israel, but these same liberals seem to give a pass to all the dictators and warlords of the world.


Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 12:10 AM

Doesn't deserve a reply except that if they are voting for Bush you must not be very intelligent. Religion aside. They've had to retract every reason they've put up for this fraud.

If you want to show some real courage, paratrooper the 81st into the Gaza strip and roll the tanks into Isreal and say stop this shit--get it together or we'll help you get it together.

Direct assistance. Walls are just made to be taken down.

Any fool can Americans are murdering these helpless poor disadvantaged people.

Insurgents, shit its their country, Americans are occupiers--leave.


Posted by: pablo at September 15, 2004 12:33 AM

Yes, its not like Hitler ran on the platform of killing Jew, gypsies, homosexuals, etc.

Why do the Gypsies get glossed over in the holocaust tally?

sure, he may not have killed as many of them, but, he came closer to wiping them out.

I have no data to back that up. Its an opinion.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:33 AM

o.k. mebbe i didn't pay enough attention in 8th grade. sorry.
my mind is changed a little.

Posted by: ja at September 15, 2004 12:24 AM

they don't teach this stuff in school

For world history we get:

America is the greatest nation on earth
Everyone else is trying hard to catch up,
but the world is filled with dictators and
bad people.

They want us to grow up being scared
of other leader's countries.

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 12:35 AM

>>I'll bet that 9 out of 10 Christians can't name 4 of the commandments ...

let alone name all Christ disciples!

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:35 AM

is the di- part of disciple a plural?

can one singular person be a sciple?

Posted by: ja at September 15, 2004 12:36 AM

http://tencommandments.org/
... THIS IS SCARY TO ME ...
Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 12:25 AM

I'll bet that 9 out of 10 Christians can't name 4 of the commandments ...

So, they are learning challenged ... thats why they want it posted up everywhere ...


Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:32 AM

thou shalt not bear false witness against thy
neighbor

thou shalt not kill

thou shalt not comit adultery

thou shalt not uh...

thou shalt not hit thy friend with a brick

i did pretty good?

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 12:37 AM

worked for me,
i was a gi joe lovin little monkey

Posted by: ja at September 15, 2004 12:39 AM

Yes, I suspect we can become the new German people, who are later ashamed for not acting differently when we first should have.


Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 12:30 AM

I'm not blind to what you are saying. Every country faces the danger of swinging too far to one side. Call me an optimist, but I think our Democracy can survive four more years of Bush (hopefully we won't have to).

To be honest, I'd have to do a little more reading about German history to give this topic the respect that it deserves.


Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 12:39 AM

can one singular person be a sciple?

No, but a rhizomatous perennial can be a scirpus.
(I have no idea wtf I'm writing about.)

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:40 AM

===================== Warning ======================
The following post contains gratuitous descriptions of pork ... Non-pork eaters, skip to the next post.
=====================================================

Ok, I just came up with a new varition on my very popular country-style bbq rib recipe. For the past two hours (whil blogging) I have prepared the most succulent, delicious ribs ever! ... The new ingredient? ... Kaluha! ... Holy Jesus and Mary is this a tasty sauce!!! ... I just substituted 1/4 cup molassass for the liquer and dropped the cooking time by 10 minutes ... perfection!

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:41 AM

>>is the di- part of disciple a plural?

the plural of disciple is disciples

You may be thinking of Bisciple?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:41 AM

my point: either she keeps doing what she is doing and sounded like a goof when it counts, or she inform herself of major works in the area.

otherwise she sounds like a medieval astrologer trying to explain star movements in the middle of cosmology conference. She is 400 yrs too late. Even Plato will chuckle listening JG shrieking about why a leader is doing this or that.

Posted by: wanda at September 14, 2004 10:32 PM

-------

that's funny

maybe JG can write a pop-psychology primer: "Medieval Tyrants for Dummies"?

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 12:42 AM

i did pretty good?
Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 12:37 AM

hehe ... nicely done! ... but you forgot
thou shalt not covet thy neighbors oil unless ye first smite him

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:44 AM

This statement pretty much sums up why friends of mine (intelligent ones) who support Bush do so. They feel that liberals are so quick to jump on America and Israel, but these same liberals seem to give a pass to all the dictators and warlords of the world.


Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 12:10 AM

Well, they say that's what it sounds like to them... but that is lame. And yes, unfortunately, we do have to tip toe around these so called "intelligent" people, because they may be intellectually intelligent but their emotional intelligence is somewhat lacking if they can't see the philosophical point of taking responsibility and cleaning up your own act first. No one likes taking responsibility, but we all must look within first before looking without. When you point your finger, three fngers point back at you. And yes, this is a psychological problem. Those who don't take responsibility for their circumstances are emotionally and psychologically immature. It's as if they have never developed a superego. As long as they blame their circumstances on outside forces, they will never be able to change. Getting overly "offended" at criticism is a weakness, no matter how you slice it. Some take it to the point of acting like victims, and using that as a way to gain "personal power". Others use it, as in this case, to justify why they are apathetic.

By the way, in a law class I took, we looked briefly at the comparison between the Nazi regime and the laws that Bush is instituting (particularly the Patriot Act), and there are many similarities. Everything Hitler did was "legal". He was elected legitimately, and he used the laws (changed them) to subjugate the Jews. It was all legal. He couldn't have done it without the will of the people. Hermann Goering, commander of the Luftwaffe said before being sentenced to death, "The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 12:44 AM

Why do people encourage Wanda to keep arguing long after its interesting?

None of us like salt in our wounds.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:44 AM

>>Why do people encourage Wanda to keep arguing long after its interesting?

and vice-versa.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:46 AM

Why do people encourage Wanda to keep arguing long after its interesting?
None of us like salt in our wounds.
Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:44 AM

I assume you mean me ... I was keeping it going until I could work in a "penis" reference. That is Nik's patented way of ending a discussion ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:46 AM

Why do I keep typing long after I've run out of things to say?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:46 AM

>>I assume you mean me

no, I was talking to my penis.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:47 AM

I wasn't referencing anyone in particular.

just a general trend that is in no way restricted to Wanda.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:49 AM

"I'm not blind to what you are saying. Every country faces the danger of swinging too far to one side. Call me an optimist, but I think our Democracy can survive four more years of Bush (hopefully we won't have to).

To be honest, I'd have to do a little more reading about German history to give this topic the respect that it deserves."

Don't you get scared when you think that if they have all three branchs' of government, that all hell could break out in four years. Look at what Delay did in redistricting Texas. These people have said that they want to distroy the Democratic party, thus rendering us (for all practical purposes)a one party state! What do you think Nazi Germany was. We can't aford the chance.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:49 AM

no, I was talking to my penis.
Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:47 AM

do you have a chubby right now?

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:49 AM

penis mightier than assword?

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:50 AM

hehe ... nicely done! ... but you forgot
thou shalt not covet thy neighbors oil unless ye first smite him


Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:44 AM
_________________
I believe that falls under

Thou shalt not kill
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors "stuff"

and of course the ultimate

Love thy neighbor as thy theyself

Which proves that Bush is not Christian

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 12:50 AM

Okay, you're going to chase all the ladies away so stop it!

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:52 AM

"The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

~Hermann Goering

Hijacking Catastrophe

Documentary featuring Noam Chomsky, Chalmers Johnson, Tariq Ali, and many more experts speaking about the Neo-Con agenda and the cloud of fear which the Neo-Cons have settled over America.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6895.htm

Posted by: plug. at September 15, 2004 12:52 AM

Don't you get scared when you think that if they have all three branchs' of government, that all hell could break out in four years. Look at what Delay did in redistricting Texas. These people have said that they want to distroy the Democratic party, thus rendering us (for all practical purposes)a one party state! What do you think Nazi Germany was. We can't aford the chance.


Posted by: at September 15, 2004 12:49 AM


A little bit. Then again, I get encouraged by things like the anti-gay Marriage ammendment not getting off the ground.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 12:53 AM

Okija Shrines Episode Barbaric, Alien to Igbo Culture--Eze Ibekwe

by
Prince Osuagwu
Lagos


...Describing Igbo tradition from the Okija menace at a press conference in Lagos, Eze Ibekwe said that "what is happening in Okija is not tradition, rather it is cannibalism, occultic secret society an barbaric. We can not link it with tradition, the Igbo tradition does not require human beings as sacrifice, it is only occultic and secret societies that can demand for human beings. This is why should encourage Christianity and Islam strongly in this country...

read entire article here:
http://allafrica.com/stories/200409140113.html


Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 12:53 AM

Tom Harkin? That old man spout out any good new lies about his Vietnam service?

--
Vietnam Lies
Democrats would do better to focus on the future.

Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:01 a.m.

We wish this Presidential election had nothing at all to do with Vietnam. There were good people who served and good people who didn't, good people who supported the war and good people who protested it. What happened really shouldn't be an issue more than 30 years later unless you lie about it. So why do the Democrats keep bringing Vietnam up, and to their own detriment?

John Kerry, for starters, has made his four-month service in that country the centerpiece of his campaign. But just last week his staff was forced to admit the Senator had been inaccurate, to put it charitably, when he claimed on multiple occasions to have spent Christmas Eve of 1968 in Cambodia while (he also said) the U.S. government was lying about his presence there.

Now comes Tom Harkin. On Monday the Iowa Senator lashed out at Dick Cheney, claiming the Vice President had no right to criticize Mr. Kerry's policies for the war on terror because Mr. Cheney had a deferment back then: "When I hear this coming from Dick Cheney, who was a coward, who would not serve during the Vietnam War, it makes my blood boil."

"Coward"? Such a comment would take chutzpah coming from anyone. But Senator Harkin is a proven fabricator when it comes to his own Vietnam-era record, as shown during his own failed 1992 Presidential bid. Consider this excerpt from a Wall Street Journal news story by James M. Perry from December 26, 1991:

"In 1979, Mr. Harkin, then a congressman, participated in a round-table discussion arranged by the Congressional Vietnam Veterans' Caucus. 'I spent five years as a Navy pilot, starting in November of 1962,' Mr. Harkin said at that meeting, in words that were later quoted in a book, Changing of the Guard, by Washington Post political writer David Broder. 'One year was in Vietnam. I was flying F-4s and F-8s on combat air patrols and photo-reconnaissance support missions. I did no bombing.'

"That clearly is not an accurate picture of his Navy service. . . . Mr. Harkin's Navy re

Posted by: phungus [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 12:54 AM

Which proves that Bush is not Christian
Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 12:50 AM

hehe ... I guess that's one way ... the other is how, when he's pretenting to pray ... you can totally tell he's not ... he's like sooo obvious! ... what a maroon!

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:55 AM

>>Don't you get scared when you think that if they have all three branchs' of government...

Especialy when you considered how quickly they got their agenda underway. like a steam roller. reelection will only serve to embolden them further.

Als, look at the back-room stuff they jumped into--Planning for the invasion of Iraq before 9-11. Looking for legal loopholes to torture. detaining people without charge...

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 12:56 AM

1)Democrats would do better to focus on the future.

2)Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:01 a.m.

3)Posted by: phungus at September 15, 2004 12:54 AM


Posted by: Why Is That Stupid? at September 15, 2004 12:56 AM

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6895.htm

Posted by: plug. at September 15, 2004 12:52 AM

nice!
I am going to put this on me blog:)

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 12:57 AM

To be honest, I'd have to do a little more reading about German history to give this topic the respect that it deserves.

Posted by: W@W
+++++++++++++
W@W -

I have not much knowledge of history. I have no expertise in the politics of the MidEast. But, I am pretty well schooled in law. And I have great sensitivity to the abusive ways so-called Christians have so utterly mis-spoken the teachings of Christ.

On this second topic I have written many times on the blog, and I suspect the blog has heard enough from me as regards my feelings.

On the first topic, please bear in mind that our US Constitution did not arise from mere nothingness. Law had a long and dignified history prior to our constitution. And so, when Abu Grhaib was revealed and the press printed Jay Bybees memo to the White House, which said that no laws otherwise outlawing torture - neither federal nor international law - can limit the President's ability to interogate terrorist suspects, I faced three realizations:

First, since the White House had developed a defense to the charge of war crimes prior to our knowledge of Abu Ghraib, the memo itself seemed tantamount to a declaration of guilt;

Second, Bush gave a press conference and told the public, ala "Casa Blanca", that he was "shocked, shocked!" by Abu Ghraib -- yet, indeed, prior to this publicity, Bush nominated Bybee (author of the torture memo) to a lifetime job as an appellate court judge, sitting one-step below the Supreme Court;

And third, our precious constituition was preceded by several centuries by a document called the Magna Charta, signed by the King in 1225 A.D., which recognized that EVEN the King is not above the law, but is subject to the law; and this, and this concept was precisely what the Bybee memo over-ruled.

And so, it is not merely the trivia of our quaint constitution that this Administration abhores; but more importantly, it is the Rule of Law, and the very foundation of Law, with which this Executive Branch has broken its solemn pact.

--- THIS IS VERY SCARY, AND NOT JUST A BLUE-DRESS KIND OF SCARY --

boopboopboopboop
... and tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow ...Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 12:57 AM

phungus? ... what the!?! ... I thought you were over in Iraq fighting freedom or something.

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:58 AM

here's to nik e:

penispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenischubby.

how's that?

Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 12:58 AM

TYPO!!!

- Magna Charta, signed by the King in 1225 A.D., -

1215, is correct.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 01:00 AM

how's that?
Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 12:58 AM

Great! Thanks Catherine!

... is it just me ... or did the font just get all bold and shit?

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:00 AM

>>do you have a chubby right now?

have a chubby, honey, I am one!

like Ed Helms said on last night's Daily show; "I can keep an erection for 91-0 days."

reminds me of the warning on the cialis ad:

CIALIS is not for everyone. If you take nitrates, often used for chest pain (also known as angina), or alpha-blockers (other than Flomax 0.4 mg once daily), prescribed for prostate problems or high blood pressure, do not take CIALIS. Such combinations could cause a sudden, unsafe drop in blood pressure. Don't drink alcohol in excess (to a level of intoxication) with CIALIS. This combination may increase your chances of getting dizzy or lowering your blood pressure. CIALIS does not protect a man or his partner from sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

The most common side effects with CIALIS were headache and upset stomach. Backache and muscle ache were also reported, sometimes with delayed onset. Most men weren't bothered by the side effects enough to stop taking CIALIS. Although a rare occurrence, men who experience an erection for more than 4 hours (priapism) should seek immediate medical attention

http://www.cialis.com/anon/index.jsp

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:01 AM

Pablo you are right about America and the Israel. But you forgot Great Britain. It was their imperialism that created the mess in the first place. No matter how Israel justifies its actions, it was created on stolen land, just like America. And like it or not it is a racist apartheid country, just like America. It supported the racist regime of South Africa just like good old America.

As it has been said, "it is not Anti semetic to tell the truth".

There is a security memorandum made available under the FOI. It is called National Security Council Memorandum #46. You can just google it.

It reveals what America was planning to do with its Black Citizens in order to protect the racist regime of South Africa and Israel.

Posted by: edna ellen poe at September 15, 2004 01:01 AM

I assume you mean me ... I was keeping it going until I could work in a "penis" reference. That is Nik's patented way of ending a discussion ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:46 AM

Hey, Nikky:

Prrbffffffft!

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 01:02 AM

THIS IS VERY SCARY, AND NOT JUST A BLUE-DRESS KIND OF SCARY --
Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 12:57 AM

Very interesting ... so, you are saying that Bush didn't just bumble into being evil ... he planned it and followed thru? ... Seems pretty thin ... then again ... its possible that the people with their hands up his ass (the ones that make his lips move) could have had some sort of plan for it ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:03 AM

~~~ I think Sam said something about the death
and distruction in Iraq tonight so did
Crowley, he mentioned how the Iraq power
grid got whacked today. ~~~

I know... and that's undeniably helpful. I concentrate on US Soldier deaths because...

1) It's something Americans evidently take interest in, when spoon fed. That interest is very harmful to the Bush campaign, whereas Iraqi deaths seem to have had less or no effect.

2) I'm beyond it seeming crass when I bring it up. If it hurts Bush, I'm gonna bring it up. The less time Bush is in office, the fewer soldiers will die. I can say this with much more certainty than Cheney's claim that a Kerry win will bring about terror Stateside. My point has a track record... data... Cheney's is something less than vaporous conjecture.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:03 AM

>>I have not much knowledge of history. I have no expertise in the politics of the MidEast. But, I am pretty well schooled in law. And I have great sensitivity to the abusive ways so-called Christians have so utterly mis-spoken the teachings of Christ.

So, Do you think Jesus has a case? Christ vs The Christians?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:04 AM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_right

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:06 AM

The simple fact remains that the US Soldier death count in Iraq increased by 10 and either no media outlets or very few covered it. For our side, this is lunacy.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:06 AM

"A little bit. Then again, I get encouraged by things like the anti-gay Marriage ammendment not getting off the ground."

It's a bit like those on the right who say you can't difinitively prove that global warming is happening so don't worry about it. Well, if it is happenig, and we don't do anything about it, we're screwed. In matters, one must ere on the side of causion. Remember, it took the largest allience and bloodiest war the world has ever seen to up root fascism. The Italians, the Germans couldn't do it. Now who will help us. Our military is larger than the rest of the world's COMBINDED!

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:07 AM

Hi dr! ... have you had a 4hr stiffy before? ... seems to me I sported wood for the majority of my jr. year in high school ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:07 AM

Was John Kerry A.W.O.L?
Written by Michael Ashbury
Tuesday, September 14, 2004



For the past year, and most recently by CBS News, we have been deluged with reports that George W. Bush did not complete his agreed duty in the Texas National Guard. He was AWOL!

But even the records show that George Bush exceeded his obligations from 1968-1973, and only came into question during the last 18 months of his agreed obligation when he requested and received official permission to transfer to an Alabama unit and then enroll in an MBA program at Harvard. His obligation was for six years from May, 1968, to May, 1974. He received an educational release from his obligation eight months early and received an Honorable Discharge in October, 1973.

While leftists question where George Bush was during the final year of his obligation, they and the press ignore completely the similar obligations of John Kerry. John Kerry enlisted in the Navy and signed an Officer Candidate Agreement on February 18, 1966. This agreement called for the candidate to

Par 3 - to serve a total period of 6 years in the Naval Reserve of the United States, including active and inactive duty.

Par 4 - agrees that on completion of active duty, he will remain for Service in the Ready Reserve for a period which when added to his active duty will total 5 years. Upon completion of 5 years of satisfactory service on active duty and in the Ready Reserve he will be eligible to transfer to the Standby Reserve for the remaining portion of his service obligation.

Par 5 - the candidate understands that the provisions of law require satisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve, unless relieved of such participation by competent authority or as provided by law. Such participation may be satisfied annually by not less 48 drills and not more than 17days active duty for training.

Lt. John Forbes Kerry was released from active duty and transferred to the Naval Reserve on January 3, 1970. He wasn’t transferred to inactive standby status until July 1, 1972, then Honorably Discharged on February 16, 1978. Where was Lt K

Posted by: phungus [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 01:09 AM

>>whereas Iraqi deaths seem to have had less or no effect.

Could be we look at their deaths a the price of their liberation?

Of maybe we suspect they were `bad Iraqis' and deserved to die?

or, we just don't care

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:11 AM

http://www.american-buddha.com/memo.46.htm

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:13 AM

So, Do you think Jesus has a case? Christ vs The Christians?

Posted by: chubby_bubba
+++++++++++++++++++++++
It shakes me so badly, I suspect, because of the mass hypnosis aspect and the mass media aspect. But, in the context of the two millenia since the crucifixion, this age is probably not much different than any other. There have probably always been many more people laying claim to Christianity than those who actually practice Christianity. The charlatans just seem to have a much greater circle of influence in the world, and they are armed with weaons of mass destruction - and all that scares me. But I am not Jesus' spokesperson.

... maybe get in touch with somebody over at CAA, I think they might handle Jesus these days:

http://www.caa.com/

:)

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 01:14 AM

February 16, 1978. Where was Lt K
Posted by: phungus at September 15, 2004 01:09 AM

Quoting an editorial by some right wing nut job (such as yourself) pulls about as much weight around here as a republican trying out for porn (no small peckers need apply)

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:14 AM

The Italians, the Germans couldn't do it. Now who will help us. Our military is larger than the rest of the world's COMBINDED!


Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:07 AM

________________________
how bout the rest of the world's mililtary's and those of us who percieve that Bush
is a dictator? The numbers will increase as time
goes on. Not everyone in the military is a muttonhead, altho at times I wonder.

I am not advocating war, btw

Positive outlook is good and effective, tho

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 01:15 AM

//
~~~ I think Sam said something about the death
and distruction in Iraq tonight so did
Crowley, he mentioned how the Iraq power
grid got whacked today. ~~~

I know... and that's undeniably helpful. I concentrate on US Soldier deaths because...

1) It's something Americans evidently take interest in, when spoon fed. That interest is very harmful to the Bush campaign, whereas Iraqi deaths seem to have had less or no effect.

2) I'm beyond it seeming crass when I bring it up. If it hurts Bush, I'm gonna bring it up. The less time Bush is in office, the fewer soldiers will die. I can say this with much more certainty than Cheney's claim that a Kerry win will bring about terror Stateside. My point has a track record... data... Cheney's is something less than vaporous conjecture.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:03 AM
//

It is the job of soldiers to potentially give their life in defense of their country. No one wants to see it (well, except perhaps you if it "hurts Bush"?). You seem to have 'soldier' and 'librarian' mixed up. Maybe that wikipedia can help you with that.

Posted by: phungus [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 01:15 AM

The simple fact remains that the US Soldier death count in Iraq increased by 10 and either no media outlets or very few covered it. For our side, this is lunacy.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:06 AM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dead boys = good for Kerry?

Live boys = bad for Kerry!

Need more dead boys!

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:16 AM

For W@W, with love:

"Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Supreme Court shall not have jurisdiction to review ... any matter to the extent that relief is sought against an element of Federal, State, or local government, or against an officer of Federal, State, or local government ... by reason of that element’s or officer’s acknowledgment of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government."

-- Constitutional Restoration Act of 2004 (H.R. 3799)

"Shiva has eight forms: Rudra, Sharva, Bhava, Ugra, Bhima, Pashupati, Ishana, and Mahadeva, which, according to the Shiva Purana, correspond to the earth, water, fire, wind, sky, a yogi called Kshetragya, the sun, and the moon respectively."

-- http://1stholistic.com/Prayer/Hindu/hol_Hindu-Shiva.htm

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 01:16 AM

Quoting an editorial by some right wing nut job (such as yourself) pulls about as much weight around here as a republican trying out for porn (no small peckers need apply)


Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:14 AM

I think it's more a matter of the topic been beaten to death. Enough with 35 year old war records.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 01:17 AM

But I am not Jesus' spokesperson.
:)
Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 01:14 AM

yeah, If jesus were around ... he'd be on the outs with establishment, tirelessly helping the poor. opening minds where ever he went, practicing patience, peace, compassion ... all sorts of anti-american stuff like that ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:17 AM

This says a lot about Kerry.

--
Soldier who lost arm in Iraq re-enlists
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. -- A reservist who lost his right arm in a roadside bombing in Iraq re-enlisted in the Army on the same day he received a Bronze Star for his service.

Sgt. Chuck Bartles, 26, raised his prosthetic right arm with his left hand as he took an oath Thursday during a re-enlistment ceremony at the Airborne & Special Operations Museum.

Bartles was injured when his vehicle was struck by a roadside bomb last year. One soldier died and two others were injured in the attack. Bartles' right arm was shattered and had to be removed above the elbow.

"I'm not bitter at all," he said. "I've been in the military my whole adult life, and I really enjoy it."

Amputees are usually given medical discharges, but Bartles twice appealed to officials at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Satisfied that he could perform his duties, they agreed to let him re-enlist.

Bartles' commander visited him at a hospital in Iraq the day after his amputation and praised his positive attitude.

"He was already talking about learning how to shoot left-handed because he didn't want to miss the deer season," said Lt. Col. James Suriano, commander of the 418th Civil Affairs Battalion.

Bartles, who is studying Russian and Eastern European studies at the University of Kansas at Lawrence, has been in the military reserves for eight years. He began in the Marines but switched to the Army three years ago to pursue language studies.

Posted by: phungus [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 01:18 AM

I think it's more a matter of the topic been beaten to death.
Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 01:17 AM

Are you talkin about politics or penises? ... well I suppose they both get flogged pretty hard ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:19 AM

Another argument our local illumnati presented me during our coffee / conference table debate this morning (I'm the only Democrat against 11 Republicans all of us males) --

"If we pull our troops from Iraq now, those 1015 will have died for nothing."

Confronted with with such superior logic, I stood up, threw each of them the bird... keeping focused on each opponent's face long enough that I was certain that they had seen it and that each knew it was for him individually. I then left the room. This may seem brash or even foolhardy on my part, Its not. We're all oilfield trash and such gestures are seen as high humor.

I think a couple of them, probably the ones who have read an entire book sometime within their lives up until now, respect my courage. Not enough to vote for Kerry but perhaps enough to just stay home on November 3rd. We're in Wyoming so its all for naught anyhow.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:19 AM

evening folks,

been on the phone a lot

distributing cd's and yakkin

bush vs kerry fer hours

with a fair amount

of success. we

have til oct

12th to reg.

peeps in Ore.

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 01:19 AM

Some Good News:

County Legislature set to vote on Patriot Act resolution

By SUSAN ELAN

The Westchester County Board of Legislators is scheduled to vote tonight on whether to join 352 cities and counties and four states in calling for repeal of provisions of the USA Patriot Act.

The local resolution, initiated 17 months ago by the Westchester Bill of Rights Defense Campaign made up of 40 civic and religious organizations, calls on President Bush and Congress to revoke sections of the law that "unnecessarily violate individual freedoms and rights, are not essential to the safety and security of our people and do not require a judicial warrant to be issued."...

read entire article here:
http://www.thejournalnews.com/newsroom/091404/b08p14patriot.html

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 01:20 AM

>>It is the job of soldiers to potentially give their life in defense of their country.

Yes, but we haven't had a US service man killed trulky defending his country since WWII.

All the recent wars are ones against governments that posed no true threat to us.


Remember: The much hyped "domino-effect" NEVER HAPPENED!!!

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:21 AM

Are you talkin about politics or penises? ... well I suppose they both get flogged pretty hard ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:19 AM

I have a black belt in the later.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 01:21 AM

- Seems pretty thin -

No, no, Nik E. Poo, I am not making a cult-of-personality over GWB, a person who - needless to say - doesn't appear altogether bright to me.

However, the whole sick cabal in charge today finds Law to be repugnant, and a limitation of their ultimate power. They have torn down the constitutioinal, statutory, and international laws to suit their need for power. I suspect more will come in a second term.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 01:21 AM

Hi dr! ... have you had a 4hr stiffy before? ... seems to me I sported wood for the majority of my jr. year in high school ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:07 AM

____________

Sure, junior high is one long sequence of concealing an unwitting and unfortunate public boner, but 4-hours continuously?

The long slog? Hell, that ain't no fun nomores, that's work, goin' four hours continuous. I like the tantric retaining-the-seed extenda-play as well as the next yahoo, but four hours would make me feel like I'm punching the company clock and I oughta be bringing me a timecard to the jobsite.

But maybe I'm coming late to the party (har, har, pun), and that's just the way kids does it these days.

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 01:22 AM

Quoting an editorial by some right wing nut job (such as yourself) pulls about as much weight around here as a republican trying out for porn (no small peckers need apply)


Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:14 AM

Ooooh........! You are so right. Let's get intellectual about it and start talking Freudian... Those Republicans... we all know that they act that way for a reason... sometimes it really just does all come down to a small peepee. (Hee hee.)

Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 01:22 AM

Good soldiers obey orders. The quality of the orders casts no shadow, nor light upon the quality of the soldier.

Phungus, that young man says more about Bush's idiocy than anything else.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:23 AM

Hi Jimmy!

I bet Oregon is not that hard of a sell-
am i right?

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 01:23 AM

We're in Wyoming so its all for naught anyhow.
Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:19 AM

I noticed in the state polling page that Utah has Wyoming beat for Bush support ... Here I thought NoDak was bad w/34% voting dem ... in Utah its 24%! ... holy crap! ...

And fish, your little episode has been played out by me in my little town too ... I've gotten to almost enjoy wading into a bar full of Republicans ordering a beer and heckling Fox.

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:24 AM

eya FG

been following the discussion

i approach it differently

whaen i get the same

arguement! first of

all the rest of

the world thinks

were insane, we need

to gain some face and quick!

changing our attitude towards

other races and countries will help.

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 01:24 AM

"I like the tantric retaining-the-seed extenda-play as well as the next yahoo"

Who was it who said that the 8-hour loving-making sessions he used to brag about actually included dinner, a movie, and hours of begging?

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:25 AM

"how bout the rest of the world's mililtary's and those of us who percieve that Bush
is a dictator? The numbers will increase as time
goes on. Not everyone in the military is a muttonhead, altho at times I wonder.

I am not advocating war, btw

Positive outlook is good and effective, tho"

I guess I am saying: "An onze of prevention is worth a pound of cure". (Or is it "a pound of flesh")? It is extreemly difficult to extinguis Fascism once it takes hold. My oppimism is hygh. Never have I ever seen the left and center so motivated. When I see a poll not good for Kerry, I just fight harder.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:25 AM

Kay you guys are gonna kick my ass for this
one, but I think it is good:

When I was eighteen I knew that the left is generally deceived. It required a few years to find out what the core delusion was but many years to appreciate how radical is the lie they believe and why it leads to so much deception. The idealism of the left is based upon the romantic delusion that "progress" is inevitable and is leading us to a future utopia. Utopia is a romantic fantasy of a perfect future secular society on earth built by man with God left out. The cruel delusion of utopia is responsible for many of the twentieth century disasters such as brutal dictatorships, major wars, countless atrocities, and destructive revolutionary movements.

Why is utopia a false hope? Original sin. We are born contaminated by the nature of sin. All parts of our human nature are infected and corrupted. Such beings are constitutionally incapable of utopia. Yet, against all reason, experience and common sense many hope for an impossible utopia. Perhaps utopia is a substitute for heaven in a post Christian secular society...

from Utopia: The perpetual delusion of the Left
by Fred Hutchison

read entire article here (and check out sexy Fred)
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hutchison/040914

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 01:27 AM

I suspect more will come in a second term.
Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 01:21 AM

I used to hate lawyers ... mostly due to my shithead brother-in-law and general portrayal by the press ... then it occurred to me that the reason lawyers are so hated and feared is because they wield power. I think that also explains why the neo-fascist Bush team wants to erode the legitimacy of the rule of law ... they attack "frivolous lawsuits", trial lawyers is used as a dirty word ... and as you say ... contempt for the constitution ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:28 AM

I guess I am saying: "An onze of prevention is worth a pound of cure". (Or is it "a pound of flesh")? It is extreemly difficult to extinguis Fascism once it takes hold. My oppimism is hygh. Never have I ever seen the left and center so motivated. When I see a poll not good for Kerry, I just fight harder.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:25 AM

:)
Why not get a nic, too?

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 01:29 AM

NEW REPORT SHOWS BUSH INCREASING GOVERNMENT SECRECY

President Bush has said that he wants to "create a culture of
transparency"[1] in government, but according to a new report to be released
today by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), his administration is going to
extraordinary lengths to increase government secrecy.

The Waxman report is consistent with earlier signs that the Bush
administration is doing everything it can to limit the amount of information
the public can get from its government. Last month, a coalition of 30
organizations issued a report saying "Secrecy has increased dramatically in
recent years under the policies of the current administration." The report
found that "the number of documents being classified has jumped 40 percent
from 2001" and that the number of documents declassified in 2003 was about
one fifth the amount declasssified in 1997. The result "is an increasing
backlog of requests filed under the Freedom of Information Act."[2]

To find Waxman's full report see both his personal office website,[3] and
the House Government Reform Committee's Minority website[4] today.


Sources:

1. "President Bush Remarks at Summit of the Americas Ceremony,"
WhiteHouse.gov, 1/12/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1192889&l=55435.
2. "White House takes secrecy to new levels, coalition reports," San
Francisco Chronicle, 8/27/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1192889&l=55436.
3. Website of Representative Henry Waxman, 9/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1192889&l=55437.
4. Government Reform Minority Office Website, 9/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1192889&l=55438.

Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 01:31 AM

Why is utopia a false hope? Original sin. We are born contaminated by the nature of sin. All parts of our human nature are infected and corrupted. Such beings are constitutionally incapable of utopia. Yet, against all reason, experience and common sense many hope for an impossible utopia.
Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 01:27 AM

Schopenhauer pretty much says the same thing.
You shouldn't be so concerned with happiness as with freedom from pain.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 01:31 AM

Jim, these guys are just beyond grunts, whistles and wild arm movements as modes of effective communication. Even while arguing verbally I can see them visibly stifle chest thumps and violent chin bobs.

The flavor of one's debate means less in these settings than its temperature served.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:31 AM

It's time:
http://www.juancole.com/

Posted by: Cat Chew at September 15, 2004 01:32 AM

read entire article here (and check out sexy Fred)
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hutchison/040914

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 01:27 AM

okay, never mind
i just read the whole article and i don't like it

sorry!

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 01:32 AM

>>This says a lot about Kerry.

It said NOTHING about Kerry.

I once met a guy who after being being discharged for medical reasons* who after he could not re-enlist, tried multiple times to book flight to Saigon so he could return to the war.

This variant of Stockholm syndrom isn't surprizing.

*he was severly wounded in action, his buddy was taking him to evac and was killed by a hand genade. When the mix-up was discovered he was given the medical.

There's more to the story...let's just say he was never really the same, but he has gotten much better.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:32 AM

- Utopia: The perpetual delusion of the Left -

Oh! Puhleeze!

Ninety-eight years passed between 1866 (when the 14th Amendment was passed by Congress granting full citizenship to African Americans, and giving the Federal government the responsibility to protect equal rights under the law to all American citizens), and the Voting Rights Act of 1964.

I'm not looking for Utopia. A little progress is nice, indeed.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 01:33 AM

Ilo:

I understand that you are discomfitted by no-nics, and that you mentioned me by name as bothersome for posting no-nic on occasion (no worries, no offense taken).

Allow me to say that I prefer that people use a nick. However, I use a no-nic, on occasion, for two reasons.

When I am posting news links, I find that I get into less conversations, arguments and punning around. It's easier.

And second, I believe no-nics should have the right to post, unlike some who object to no-nics and feel they should be banned. (For what it's worth, I also don't believe so-called "trolls" should be banned, unless they are repeatedly abusive and/or incorrigibly inconsiderate.)

I suspect, tho' I have no way of proving it, that many start by using a no-nic and eventually adopt a nic.

And yes, I am fully aware of all the confusion that sometimes ensues from multiple no-nics (though you can choose not to engage them; it's like turning off an objectionable TV station), and also that some no-nics say things they ordinarily might not otherwise, becoming emboldened by their anonymity.

For all that, tho', I believe it wrong to stifle or suppress the timid. So I post no-nic on occasion to stick up for the contemptible no-nic. Many here wish to bully no-nics and call them cowards, and sometimes this is true, but sometimes it is not. Sometimes no-nics have very real gifts to offer.

I guess I pull for the underdog in this case. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I persist nonetheless.

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 01:35 AM

//
>>It is the job of soldiers to potentially give their life in defense of their country.

Yes, but we haven't had a US service man killed trulky defending his country since WWII.

All the recent wars are ones against governments that posed no true threat to us.

Remember: The much hyped "domino-effect" NEVER HAPPENED!!!

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:21 AM
//

Oh gosh, you are so right. You have crystalized it.

Hell. Even those that died in WW2 died in vain. There was no true threat. At all. Germany was not a threat to us. There were no Nazis running around our streets, well, except in NYC. Pearl Harbor was an accident. September the 11th was also a horrible accident. The brave men and women serving now against Islamofascists are not defending our country at all. They are just sucking the government coffers dry. Coffers better off spent giving crack whores and idiots $30/hr jobs.

Posted by: phungus [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 01:36 AM

"Why not get a nic, too?"

Conbo, I intend to, but I have to get my extra email address worked out first. I don't want to use my primary email address. I'm lazy, But I do intend to.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:37 AM

Conbo ~ I don't think that the left has that illusion of Utopia ... I don't. Do you? Sure there are a few, particularly a long while ago. But for the most part, the premise is a myth... just like the one that there are all these poor people taking advantage of "the system" and living high on the hog off welfare... it's b.s.

Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 01:37 AM

Ironically, Schopenhauer felt the best form of government is a monarchy. He saw the weakness in republics is that there is too much infighting among those trying to maintain and increase their power; whereas, the king's power was so secure that he could choose the best people for each job, without the fear of losing his own.

"Even the solar system is a monarchy", he said.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 01:37 AM

Hey no nic... you don't need an email address

Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 01:39 AM

The DJs (mallory and campy) from the pop radio station's morning show(WGTZ Z-93) said they would give a prize to whoever brought in the most Kerry signs.

Someone over at Atrios got back from a Kerry barnstorming meeting in Ohio. He said that there were reports from people that last night their yard signs were stolen.

One man stood up and said his neighbor has contacts in the John Boehner(he's our congressman) office and they sent out people to steal the signs. They were bragging they got 400 in the area last night.

He noted that they are giving a prize for theft. He found it disgraceful.

Posted by: spocko [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 01:39 AM

Jim,

~~~ all the rest of the world thinks were insane, we need to gain some face and quick! changing our attitude towards other races and countries will help. ~~~

We are insane! Where I work, we are fully 11/12ths insane! I haven't even mentioned the upcoming all out war between Christianity and Islam these guys advocate. And these aren't long held beliefs. These fellows have extrapolated every bit of this via what they think Bush wants.

These fellows' beliefs are not rare. November 2nd is judgement day. THE judgement day.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:39 AM

eya conbo

well i talk with folks
that have various circles of frends
i back up all my sources and have
documentation, buildin a rep
takes forever and has to
be constantly refreshed
to be effective, what i'm
after is increased awareness
and participation as well as more
informed voters, my vet buds are way active
the college profs i know are makin sure folks
are hip for the most part, exceptions are
standing out more and more, also the
fact is most of my opposition
has no documentation, also
i help with good come
backs on specific
issues my frends are
dealing with in coffee shops!

hiya ilo
yup my frend i see the wool
is falling off yer eyes!
Remember all the good
things too about
people and living to
restore your balance and
courage, we can fix this no prob!

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 01:39 AM

Conbo, I intend to, but I have to get my extra email address worked out first. I don't want to use my primary email address. I'm lazy, But I do intend to.


Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:37 AM

go on yahoo and make one up
OR
don't post an email
you don't have to, you know
how bout this for a Nic:

Procrasitnator

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 01:40 AM

"Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:37 AM"
Try:
http://www.mailinator.net/mailinator/Welcome.do

Posted by: Catshew at September 15, 2004 01:40 AM

I used to hate lawyers ... --Nik E Poo

Despite the overwrought claims of Edwards' dazzling legal skills, winning jury verdicts in personal injury cases has nothing to do with legal talent and everything to do with getting the right cases – unless "talent" is taken to mean "having absolutely no shame." Edwards specialized in babies with cerebral palsy whom he claimed would have been spared the affliction if only the doctors had immediately performed Caesarean sections.

As a result of such lawsuits, there are now more than four times as many Caesarean sections as there were in 1970. But curiously, there has been no change in the rate of babies born with cerebral palsy. As the New York Times reported: "Studies indicate that in most cases, the disorder is caused by fetal brain injury long before labor begins." All those Caesareans have, however, increased the mother's risk of death, hemorrhage, infection, pulmonary embolism and Mendelson's syndrome.

In addition, the "little guys" Edwards claims to represent are having a lot more trouble finding doctors to deliver their babies these days as obstetricians leave the practice rather than pay malpractice insurance in excess of $100,000 a year.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=14143

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:40 AM

No phungus, YOU"RE right. All those Gemans who died in Stalingrad died *protecting* thier fatherland.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:41 AM

Why won't Kerry sign a SF 180? What is he hiding?

http://www.archives.gov/facilities/mo/st_louis/military_personnel_records/standard_form_180.html

Posted by: phungus [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 01:42 AM

Conbo ~ I don't think that the left has that illusion of Utopia ...
___________
me either
it was a dumb article
sorry:)
See Chubby, I apologize, too

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 01:42 AM

I s there a distinction between using no nic, (knowing full well that `identity' is already taken) and purposely posting under someone else's name?

I really don't see one. But, that is my opinion, not an absolute truth.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:44 AM

David -

You've said as much before, and I appreciate your explanation. Your personal choice makes sense to me - in fact, I'll scan the no-nic post for links; but original writing I tend to skip unless I can attach a name to the posting.

For me, this blogging business is like trying to have a cocktail party in a freight train while going 90 miles an hour over a cliff, and everyone is trying to talk to everyone else at the same time, and all of us have just met for the first time moments ago.

In such a setting, names are not really important, but it helps me remember my own place in the queue of conversation.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 01:44 AM

This no nic.

I'll take care of this by Thrusday. Thanks for the advise and good discourse. I must make a call and then go to sleep. Talk to you all tommoro.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:45 AM

~~~ No phungus, YOU"RE right. All those Gemans who died in Stalingrad died *protecting* thier fatherland. ~~~

Touche' Chubby!

I'm definitely using THAT one!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:46 AM

who said anything about the email addy having to be real? many, many people myself included, use fake, even comical, email addys.

mouse over some names and you'll see what I mean.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:47 AM

MISS SHELL WHERE ARE YOU???

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:48 AM

eya FG

las time they were really being stupid

i got up on top of a table

and told em all off!

(i wanted to be able

to kick the first ahole

that came at me square in

the beezer and i'm a lil short shit

thats a bit prebent already)

worked that time and i

have'nt had to repeat it!

Thank god! but i'd do er again!

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 01:49 AM

Hello Sunshine!!

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 01:49 AM

>>I'm definitely using THAT one! I'm honored!

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:49 AM

I use a real email addy only in hope that on one fine day, I'll receive nude pictures that AREN'T spam.

Not really... but it sounded good.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:50 AM

Talk to you all tommoro.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:45 AM

bye!

get a nic no nic
then I can say bye "to so and so"

would be nicer, huh?

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 01:50 AM

Why won't Kerry sign a SF 180? What is he hiding?
http://www.archives.gov/facilities/mo/st_louis/military_personnel_records/standard_form_180.html
Posted by: phungus at September 15, 2004 01:42 AM

Hey did Bush release his payroll record yet?
ahahahahaaaaa...

still trying to hide the fact he is AWOL I see.

Posted by: wanda at September 15, 2004 01:51 AM

In addition, the "little guys" Edwards claims to represent are having a lot more trouble finding doctors to deliver their babies these days as obstetricians leave the practice rather than pay malpractice insurance in excess of $100,000 a year.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=14143

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:40 AM

Uh... hello... it has to do with the insurance companies... do you know the kind of profits the insurance companies make? And do you remember one of the first groups Bush gave a big fat gift to when the economy and the markets were first starting to ail... was the insurance companies! Remember?! Even the financial industry (those not in the insurance biz that is) were outraged. Stock tip: invest in these companies... their profits are outstanding... of course if you have any kind of ethics, you might think twice. I looked at some of these companies financials when I was in M&A. And that was during a year when every other business was hurting.

Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 01:51 AM

From:
../../../archives/000791.php

none of us have met in person
but you are like my 70-day family
somehow my heart gotted wrapped all
over dada - and it's not cool anymore
it was nice before - and now it just hurts
when i come to the blog crying - that's not cool
and as far as i know only time and space heal a broken heart
(and i don't even know how my heart got involved here anyway...shite happens i guess)

i always feel good when i'm very honest so there ya go

i fell into some sort of weird love with dada
and now it just hurts too much to be here..cuz all i do is look for him to post...and i recall that i used to have a sense of humor that i cannot seem to find here lately...

last time i fell in love with someone i'd never met was david lee roth...

anywayz, at least telling the blog the truth has stopped my crying...that's a start.

i can never thank each of you enough for all i've gained from being with you here...

xoxox
shell
xoxox


Posted by: s h e l l at September 14, 2004 03:50 PM

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:52 AM

~~~ Thank god! but i'd do er again! ~~~

Exactly, good vs evil at mythical proportions!

All life is precious and it has never been so at risk.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:53 AM

>>Why won't Kerry sign a SF 180? What is he hiding?

another red herring from the fun guy. Kerry released his records long ago. You choose to believe disinformation.

Just like a good little nazi.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:53 AM

My feelings remain the same. She does sometimes miss ... or grate a bit, but you too need to work on how you come across.. as do we all. Reread what you wrote, with an objective eye (if you can - it's apparently not that easy), notice the mistakes, the non-sequiters, the tone, and the points not made... give her the same slack you would want.
Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 12:15 AM

non-sequiters? Heya Nobody.

Posted by: wanda at September 15, 2004 01:54 AM

hi ilo

cocktail maam?

we still have a way's to the bottom

of this train wreck, might as well eh?

brought a chuckle yer description!

this evening the bloggie has

been moving at show speed.

usually al lil slower

paced fer us 2 finger typers

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 01:54 AM

Trying to have a discussion with phungus is like trying to pick apples from a chestnut tree ... its fruitless ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:56 AM

Stock tip: invest in these companies... their profits are outstanding... of course if you have any kind of ethics, you might think twice. I looked at some of these companies financials when I was in M&A. And that was during a year when every other business was hurting.

Posted by: Catharine at September 15, 2004 01:51 AM

"A company's stock price is a good indicator of the position of a company; however, the position of a company is an unreliable indicator as to the company's future stock price."

Leon Allen

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 01:56 AM

~~~ i fell into some sort of weird love with dada ~~~

The first online love occupies a portion of us that has never been occupied by anything... a part of us that is hypersensitive. VERY powerful... but thankfully just as short lived and usually never visited again.

Shell will be fine. We all were, at one time or another.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 01:57 AM

I s there a distinction between using no nic, (knowing full well that `identity' is already taken) and purposely posting under someone else's name?

I really don't see one. But, that is my opinion, not an absolute truth.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 01:44 AM

____________


I do see one.

If someone has a deliberate nic and someone else steals it or masks it, then you are assuming an identity.

If you are a no-nic, you are part of the collective unconscious, so to speak, and each thought expressed in a no-nic post is independent unto itself.

One can choose to engage it, ignore it, decry it, disparage it, etc., but it is unique unto itself in its singularity. In other words, unlike the people you come to "know" by their nic, a no-nic post is a foreign, unproven, unknown item that must succeed (or fail) wholly upon its merits.

It is not given the benefit of the doubt. Part of the trade-off for anonymity. But no, it is nothing like simulating another person's nic, imo.

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 01:59 AM

Speak for yourself, Fish. I've never been in love with Dada.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:00 AM

Lets all berat up dadalux for breaking Shells heart.

I thought she was married, has a million cats...how does she have room in her heart to become so attached to a `phantom' love?

I love Shell, but it is this sort of thing that scares the living crap out of old bachelors like myself.

How can we become so attached to words zooming through the ethernet?

I think she is just very emotional today. I hope she will be back with us soon. When she comes back I shan't mention her absence other to say, "I'm glad you're back!"

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:00 AM

berat up

beat up. I meant beat up.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:02 AM

Trying to have a discussion with phungus is like trying to pick apples from a chestnut tree ... its fruitless ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:56 AM

yes, but there's lots of nuts

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 02:03 AM

... Edwards specialized in babies with cerebral palsy whom he claimed would have been spared the affliction if only the doctors had immediately performed Caesarean sections. ...

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 01:40 AM
=======================
Bad lawyers are like bad policemen. There are corrupt police officers in every jurisdiction, and bad lawyers are found everywhere. All the same, given that Utopia is unlikely to be built, a society without lawyers and policemen is more frightening to me, than a society that has persons who play such roles in our society.

FURTHER, as to medical malpractice, your statement is really quite inapt. Edwards is a lawyer, not a doctor. In medical malpractice, what the jury evaluates is the competing testimony of expert witnesses, for the plaintiff and the defendant. Therefore, it is battle between DOCTORS, since the expert witnesses in medical malpractice cases are doctors.

PLEASE CONSIDER THIS: Would an architect accept a job on the condition that she would only be paid if the building withstood the elements of nature, after learning that the client wanted the building erected on a sandbar at low tide? By analogy, lawyers are unlikely to file many "frivilous" lawsuits, for this is a direct route to bancruptcy for the lawyer.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 02:04 AM

i think shared love
is important and so
is attempted love

i always picture
the ladies as
53 yr old
retired teamsters
who aren't allowed to crossdress
in public and are sitting in rooms
being delighted that peeps love their minds and style, heehee and i love em for it
this the only place where peeps
can be themselves or refine
who they really are.
also i love u all
in a real way.

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 02:04 AM

Nuclear Weapons Stealth Takeover

by LEUREN MORET

5 Admirals, U.C. Regents, Carlyle Group, and Rand

"I think some of these folks would put nuclear tips on ice cream cones if they could."

U.S. Representative Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.) on efforts by Bush Administration officials to repeal a research ban on low-yield nuclear weapons.

Global Security Newswire ‘Quote of the Day’ May 19, 2003

UC AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS: THE KISS OF DEATH

read entire article here:
http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=3323

is some scary shiite!

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:04 AM

I thought she was married, has a million cats...how does she have room in her heart to become so attached to a `phantom' love?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:00 AM

I wondered about that myself.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:05 AM

>>The first online love occupies a portion of us that has never been occupied by anything

fortunately, my first online infatuation was with porn:

http://www.dynamix.net/motw.html

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:05 AM

yes, but there's lots of nuts

...sometimes you feel like a nut,
sometimes you don't...

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 02:05 AM

~~~ How can we become so attached to words zooming through the ethernet? ~~~

Its a wicked little receptor within our minds (hearts, more descriptively) that probably evolved for something else entirely. Once that receptor is fitted the effect is overwhelming, sudden and intense. Two weeks. Month on the outside and it is gone. And I mean gone.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:06 AM

xoxox

always welcome!

xoxox

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 02:06 AM

Trying to have a discussion with phungus is like trying to pick apples from a chestnut tree ... its fruitless ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 01:56 AM

yes, but there's lots of nuts

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 02:03 AM

Har!
that was funny

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:06 AM

~~~ fortunately, my first online infatuation was with porn ~~~

Better than with a lawn tractor. I yearned for a guitar online once such that I thought I might die.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:08 AM

~fortunately, my first online infatuation was with porn~

i went to my first strip club the other night.

it didn't smell bad.

(i thought it would smell bad)

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 02:12 AM

*

sometimes
you need symbolic
love instead of reality

*

i think
about how
much courage
it takes to love

*

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 02:13 AM

W@W,

~~~ Speak for yourself, Fish. I've never been in love with Dada. ~~~

And you expect me to believe that. Fine, I feel no need to re-awaken your pain.

*supersnark*

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:13 AM

Ok, I just came up with a new varition on my very popular country-style bbq rib recipe. For the past two hours (whil blogging) I have prepared the most succulent, delicious ribs ever! ... The new ingredient? ... Kaluha! ... Holy Jesus and Mary is this a tasty sauce!!! ... I just substituted 1/4 cup molassass for the liquer and dropped the cooking time by 10 minutes ... perfection!

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 12:41 AM

beef or pork?

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 02:13 AM

>>I yearned for a guitar online once such that I thought I might die

exactly! In love with an ideal with no idea of its reality. The guitar is the perfect analogy -- thee's no way of telling how well it plays, the action, the tone. We only can project our assumptions or wishes.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Daily show's Cobert on the gun ban -- hilarious! especially about assualt weapons in Iraq. ' a model we should look to, everyone has assault weapons there and they are successful holding off a much bigger occupying force' -- something to that effect.

Lewis BLACK!!!! is ON!!!

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:14 AM

beef or pork?
Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 02:13 AM

didn't you notice the heading?:
===================== Warning ======================
The following post contains gratuitous descriptions of pork ... Non-pork eaters, skip to the next post.
=====================================================

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 02:16 AM

>>Lewis BLACK!!!!

he's talking about the commercialisation of `Patriots day"

Its so delicous, you'll whish every day was Sept 11th!

Cowery the self-wetting cat!!!

Black is on fore tonight!

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:16 AM

romantic love is for shmucks and sillies
i gave up long ago, too many shocks and jolts

anyway check this out:

Government must argue ID case publicly

''It's wild that the government can't even confirm this most basic security directive that every passenger in the country knows exists,'' said Susan Seager, a lawyer who was preparing to argue on behalf of several news organizations, including The Associated Press, against the government's bid to seal.

read entire article here:
http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/news/9659435.htm

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:17 AM

act now or the terrorist win!

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:18 AM

In urban fighting, it isn't the size of the force... its the size of the force which can be brought down an alleyway effectively. Single shot 22s are effective in such an environment.

You can't fit a division down an alley. And here's the kicker... WE'RE trying to teach IRAQIS how to do it right!

HAHAHAHAHA!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:20 AM

Black was on fire, not fore.

I was laughing so loud I woke the cats!

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:21 AM


" We all were, at one time or another."

Excuse me? You all were?
Scary! Scary!

And I thought I had problems -

Please turn off your computer right now and learn to do some real living -

but what do I know

I am just a comb

Posted by: wolfowitz's comb at September 15, 2004 02:22 AM

Freedom of Information Threat Level 'Severe'

By Lucy Dalglish


WASHINGTON, Sep 15, 2004 -- In the days immediately following September 11, the U.S. government embarked on a disturbing path of secrecy. The atmosphere of terror induced public officials to abandon this country's culture of openness and opt for secrecy as a way of ensuring safety and security.

At first, we hoped that the move toward secrecy would be short lived. The actions would be viewed as temporary" or "emergency" measures. Unfortunately, that has not been the case. Led by secrecy-loving officials in the executive branch, secrecy in the United States government is now the norm...

read entire article here:
http://www.mediachannel.org/views/dissector/affalert255.shtml

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:22 AM

In a Station of the Metro

THE apparition of these faces in the crowd;
Petals on a wet, black bough.

-- Ezra Pound

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 02:23 AM

beef or pork?
Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 02:13 AM

didn't you notice the heading?:
===================== Warning ======================
The following post contains gratuitous descriptions of pork ... Non-pork eaters, skip to the next post.
=====================================================

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 02:16 AM

---------

Nah, Nikky, I is illiterate.

I could smell 'em was all.

Mmmm.

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 02:23 AM

romantic love is for shmucks and sillies
i gave up long ago, too many shocks and jolts

a nice phase to go thru,
real love is doin fer others
what they can't do for themselves
service instead of gratification
loving instead of hating
even if it kills ya
i'm no pro tho
i am trying!

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 02:24 AM

romantic love is for shmucks and sillies
Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:17 AM

I guess that makes me a shmuck. I can live with that ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 02:25 AM

so neo-cons don't know real love?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:25 AM

I am just a comb
Posted by: wolfowitz's comb at September 15, 2004 02:22 AM

Cool! ... now that you're here Mr Comb ... why don't you give phungus a nice moist combing ... he's got a cowlick.

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 02:27 AM

~~~ Please turn off your computer right now and learn to do some real living ~~~

I was born in 1955. Became sick of real living before I knew what a computer was.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:27 AM

Goldwater, my dad was big into him.

when he died, the spin from the proto-neo-cons was he was too liberal.

my how times change.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:28 AM

krist, Fish, from the way you described yerself I figure you to be in your 70s

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:30 AM

~~~ but what do I know I am just a comb ~~~

What's REALLY scary is that you think, after the 50th time... that that's still funny.

That scares the shit out of me.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:31 AM

the spin from the proto-neo-cons was he was too liberal.

my how times change.

Posted by: chubby_bubba
=======================
I put a little ricotta on a hotdog bun and said to myself, "What I have here is a proto-neo-cannoli!"

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 02:31 AM

maybe it's not age but
miles that does it.

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 02:32 AM

~~~ krist, Fish, from the way you described yerself I figure you to be in your 70s ~~~

I portray myself that way. Less threatening, maybe?

I dunno.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:32 AM

There are people in my neighborhood who make a decent living walking dogs. They charge 10$ a pop. Sometimes they walk several at the same time. They do this all day. On the weekends, they do dog sitting, charging like 40$ a day.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:33 AM

real love is doin fer others
what they can't do for themselves
service instead of gratification
loving instead of hating
even if it kills ya
i'm no pro tho
i am trying!

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 02:24 AM
__________________
Amen, Jimmy
And you are a pro:)
God bless you

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:34 AM

proto-neo-cons was he was too liberal.
Posted by: chubby_bubba

Sounds like a term thrown around by dinosaurologists ... you know ... rock sweeper dudes and dudettes. You must read nat geo.

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 02:34 AM

>>There are people in my neighborhood who make a decent living walking dogs.

Cheney will be happy to hear that!n first ebay, now dogwalkers.

Tomorrow squeegee men?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:34 AM

~~~ but what do I know I am just a comb ~~~

What's REALLY scary is that you think, after the 50th time... that that's still funny.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:31 AM

C'mon. It's pretty funny. Then again, I think Nobody's Right Hand Man is a hoot.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:36 AM

eya FG
dar was hopin you'd bringer
up to speed on Sistani and
the hap's on that scene!
she say give u a blog smoochie!
darlenbc@yahoo.com

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 02:36 AM

Can It Happen Here?

by Maureen Farrell

...And so it goes.

On Sunday, the St. Petersburg Times ran an Op-ed entitled, "Americans in danger are vulnerable to dictatorship," describing the frighteningly simple conventional wisdom the country now seems to embrace. "The 'man on horseback' mentality, the belief that a leader's strength is more important than where it leads them, defines a population that is vulnerable to dictatorship," Martin Dyckman wrote, before adding (else someone jump down his throat) a disclaimer. "This is not to call Bush a dictator or suggest that he wants to be one." (Never mind Bush's thrice-repeated joke about wishing it were so).

"But let no one believe that it couldn't happen here, as has happened so often elsewhere," Dyckman concluded, echoing Lewis' ageless theme.

Of course, now that two wars and two Presidential campaigns are underway, attention has been diverted. But the unease that rippled from post-9/11 aftershocks continues. It's just different now. Somehow.

"Uncertainty is a very important factor, and, instead of decreasing as time goes on, it grows," one of Mayor's subjects confided. "You speak privately to you colleagues, some of whom certainly feel as you do; but what do they say? They say, "It's not so bad" or "You're seeing things" or "You're an alarmist."

And it's not so bad. For the moment. Or at least until after the election and the return of the draft or until after the next major attack and the triumph of fear over liberty. After all, mainstream papers are free to discuss Americans' vulnerability to dictatorship, while citizens are still permitted to read 70-year-old novels describing conditions that are eerily familiar...

read entire article here:
http://www.buzzflash.com/farrell/04/09/far04030.html

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:36 AM

there are no dinosaurs in the bible. niether is the National Geographic.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:37 AM

There are people in my neighborhood who make a decent living walking dogs. They charge 10$ a pop. Sometimes they walk several at the same time. They do this all day. On the weekends, they do dog sitting, charging like 40$ a day.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:33 AM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
How much malpractice insurance does a dogwalker have to carry in order to set up shop?

And do you think a person could add a little extra to their income if during the course of the walk, a few of the pups could be unloaded on EBay? Assuming, of course, the insurance company settles up with the missing dog's owner.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 02:37 AM

Tomorrow squeegee men?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:34 AM

They use to, until Guiliani put the "Squeezee" on them.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:37 AM

so neo-cons don't know real love?

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:25 AM

they do talk about sodomy and whores a lot at
nicedoggies. i suppose that is their love

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:38 AM

Jim,

~~~ eya FG
dar was hopin you'd bringer
up to speed on Sistani and
the hap's on that scene! ~~~

I got an email started at work I'll get off to her in the morning. How about that baby boy? There's hope for this planet yet, yes?

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:38 AM

eya conbo
backatchu kiddoo!
he smilin on us both eh?

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 02:39 AM

On the weekends, they do dog sitting, charging like 40$ a day.
Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:33 AM

hmmm ...

weekend days per year = 52 x 2 = 104.
$40 x 104 = $4,160.00

weekdays per year = 365 - 104 = 261.
several dogs at $10 per dog = $30
$30 x 261 = $7,830.00

$7,830 + 4,160 = $11,990 per year

Not exactly a "living wage" for NYC.

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 02:40 AM

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
How much malpractice insurance does a dogwalker have to carry in order to set up shop?

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 02:37 AM

Probably none. But I've wondered about that myself. What happens if the dog gets sick while in your care?

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:40 AM

he smilin on us both eh?

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 02:39 AM

I hope so Jimmy:)

some days I think he is a little annoyed w/me,
but you know, he is patient

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:41 AM

ya
deres always hope eh?
i do it for alla de kiddoos
i adopted Iraq months ago
might adopt the whole
world sooner r later

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 02:41 AM

RE: crazy Adolph

Catharine made a good point about Hitler dismantling the Weimar Republic legally. This is so.

But someone else made the point about Hitler being elected. This is sort of yes and sort of no, but mostly no.

In 1932, Hitler's National Socialists got 32% of the vote in the Reichstag, giving them a plurality. Hitler used this as political leverage (and a great degree of back-door machinations with useful fools like von Papen) to (ultimately) get himself appointed chancellor (equivalent to prime minister) by President von Hindenburg in Jan. of 1933.

Then, once chancellor, Hitler used the Reichstag fire in Feb. of '33 and the terrified hysteria that accompanied it to ram through the "enabling act" later in March of the same year (giving Hitler unimpeded executive authority), which allowed Hitler to (legally, mind) dismantle the liberal democratic Weimar republic of Germany, leading to horrors like The Night of the Long Knives, Kristal Nacht, blitzkrieg attacks, total war, and the Final Solution.

But Hitler *was* elected, after a fashion, but it was done by self-justifying plebiscite (sort a like certain South American "elections") *after* the enabling act of March, 1933, which granted Hitler legal and executive dictatorial powers for -- wink, wink -- four years (though not yet military, that came later) to control free speech and press, ban political parties, crush unions, etc., thereby legally intimidating or disbanding those who might otherwise oppose him.

Hitler gamed the system, and once he had it rigged how he needed it, including having the military swear a loyalty oath to him upon the death of President von Hindenburg, making Hitler both Fuehrer and Reich Chancellor, only *then* would he allow a plebiscite election to approve him as dictator.

While it's technically true that Hitler "won" election, he did so in a rigged fashion and merely to seek the "unimpeachable" approval of the country to become their fuehrer.

August 19, 1934
Event: Hitler elected Fuhrer (95.7% of German voters).

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 02:43 AM

>>Probably none. But I've wondered about that myself. What happens if the dog gets sick while in your care?

Just keep them out of Oregon:

Authorities investigate four dog poisonings on the Oregon coast
9/11/2004, 6:47 p.m. PT
The Associated Press

MANZANITA, Ore. (AP) — Authorities on the Oregon coast are investigating an apparent string of dog poisonings, and are warning pet owners to keep their animals leashed while on the beach.

Four dogs became sick after visiting Manzanita Beach over the past month, according to the Manzanita Department of Public Safety. Three of the four died, and two of the deaths were linked to a toxic herbicide used last summer in a case of dog poisonings in Portland's Laurelhurst Park.

Officials are investigating whether the third dog also died from the herbicide paraquat, which can be easily mixed with food or water. Symptoms of paraquat poisoning may include vomiting and lethargic behavior.

The dog poisonings come a year after more than a dozen dogs died from eating meat tainted with paraquat in Portland's Laurelhurst Park in a case that remains unsolved.

http://www.oregonlive.com/newsflash/regional/index.ssf?/base/news-7/109495405391050.xml&storylist=orlocal

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:43 AM

ok ... thats it ... I'm out ... this blog has gone to the dogs ... hehe ...

adios fuckers!

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 02:44 AM

weekdays per year = 365 - 104 = 261.
several dogs at $10 per dog = $30
$30 x 261 = $7,830.00

$7,830 + 4,160 = $11,990 per year

Not exactly a "living wage" for NYC.


Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 02:40 AM

Ladies and Gentlemen: The Rain Man

Actually, It's more like about 500-600 a week which is doable if you live in Queens or Brooklyn.


Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:44 AM

eya NEP
g'nite
ya lil snort!

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 02:47 AM

ok ... thats it ... I'm out ... this blog has gone to the dogs ... hehe ...

adios fuckers!


Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 02:44 AM

bye Nik

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:47 AM

>>this blog has gone to the dogs ... hehe ...

yeah, this is a Cats only blog

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:47 AM

bye'ya!

me oughta go soon too.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 02:48 AM

By George, he's plotted

BY JESSE JACKSON Advertisement



George Orwell would be appalled. The author of the classic 1984 wrote about the ability of totalitarian powers to control minds through propaganda. They could claim war is peace and repeat it enough that people came to believe it. Orwell never would have imagined that the same propaganda techniques could be so successful in a democracy with a free press -- but George Bush is proving just that...

read entire article here:
http://www.suntimes.com/output/jesse/cst-edt-jesse14.html

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:49 AM

yeah, this is a Cats only blog

Did War Dog get the boot?

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 02:49 AM

Never seen nor heard of a better Man than Jim. In all truth, he's up there with Sy Hersh and Mark Twain in my book.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:50 AM

C'mon. It's pretty funny. Then again, I think Nobody's Right Hand Man is a hoot.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:36 AM

---------

I am a fan myself.

Even when I am the one being punctured. It's consistently very good satire.

For a brief period, I had my own right-hand man, but word must've got around that I is left-handed and put the kibosh on the whole project.

dr

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 02:50 AM

Never seen nor heard of a better Man than Jim. In all truth, he's up there with Sy Hersh and Mark Twain in my book.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:50 AM

Mark Twain was kinda rude compared to Jimmy:)

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:52 AM

Barak Obama on Franken... on Sundance!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:52 AM

~~~ Mark Twain was kinda rude compared to Jimmy ~~~

That level of talent.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:54 AM

tanks FG
i'm really
an ol snort bud!
(i'm jus behavin myself)
but it's a dam nice compliment!

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 02:54 AM

AL-QAEDA AND LOS ALAMOS
By Cliff Kincaid

...Peter Stockton of the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) says there is a site at Los Alamos known as Technical Area 18, which is in a canyon and is a repository for tons of highly enriched uranium and plutonium. If al-Qaeda terrorists take over the facility and detonate what is called “an improvised nuclear device,” they could “take out a chunk of northern New Mexico,” he says. “It’s very easily done and it’s very quickly done.” The terrorists would simply place conventional explosives on either end of the nuclear materials, slam them together, and produce a detonation...

read entire article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff14.htm

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 02:56 AM

While in Saratoga, I saw a cool Mark Twain quote:

"It's a difference of opinion that makes horseraces"

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:57 AM

Oct. 18, 1999 | A new book by Texas author J.H. Hatfield claims that George W. Bush was arrested for cocaine possession in 1972, but had his record expunged with help from his family's political connections. In an afterword to his book "Fortunate Son: George W. Bush and the Making of an American President" (St. Martin's), Hatfield says he took a second look at the Bush cocaine allegations after a story in Salon reporting allegations that Bush did community service for the crime at the Martin Luther King Jr. Community Center in Houston's Third Ward.

The center's executive director, Madgelean Bush (no relation to George W. Bush), had told Salon News and others that Bush did not do community service there, and the Bush campaign likewise denied the allegation. But the Texas governor had admitted to working at Houston's Project P.U.L.L. in 1972, and Hatfield says he began to wonder if that was actually the community service sentence. Hatfield says he confirmed those suspicions with three sources close to the Bush family he had cultivated while writing his biography, which publishes Wednesday.

But Hatfield quotes "a high-ranking advisor to Bush" who confirmed that Bush was arrested for cocaine possession in Houston in 1972, and had the record expunged by a judge who was "a fellow Republican and elected official" who helped Bush get off "with a little community service at a minority youth center instead of having to pick cotton on a Texas prison farm."

Hatfield quotes a former Yale classmate who told him: "George W. was arrested for possession of cocaine in 1972, but due to his father's connections, the entire record was expunged by a state judge whom the older Bush helped get elected. It was one of those 'behind closed doors in the judges' chambers' kind of thing between the old man and one of his Texas cronies who owed him a favor ... There's only a handful of us that know the truth."

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/10/18/cocaine

Posted by: wanda at September 15, 2004 02:58 AM

Just read Juan Cole's latest on the Turkmen and Tal Afar. Amazing what this administration can blunder into without the slightest consideration. What a mess.

This continues another week and Osama Bin Laden will find no safer home than Turkey itself.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:58 AM

*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+

*bunnies and kitties and sweaters and pepsi*

*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 02:59 AM

The Psycho State
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD

...One obvious beneficiary of the proposal is the pharmaceutical industry, which is eager to sell the psychotropic drugs that undoubtedly will be prescribed to millions of American schoolchildren under the new screening program. Of course a tiny minority of children suffer from legitimate mental illnesses, but the widespread use of Ritalin and other drugs on youngsters who simply exhibit typical rambunctious, fidgety, and impatient behavior is nothing short of criminal. It may be easier to teach and parent drugged kids, but convenience is no justification for endangering them. Children’s brains are still developing, and the truth is we have no idea what the long-term side effects of psychiatric drugs may be. Medical science has not even exhaustively identified every possible brain chemical, even as we alter those chemicals with drugs...

read entire article here:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul203.html

this particulary scares me because my son is
high a energy type of little boy. He is so smart.
But impatient, and curious. No way in hell does
he need medication tho. I will go to jail before
i put him on anything...

Posted by: Conbo at September 15, 2004 03:00 AM

CHRISTIAN, n.
One who believes that the New Testament is a divinely inspired book admirably suited to the spiritual needs of his neighbor. One who follows the teachings of Christ in so far as they are not inconsistent with a life of sin.

from: The Devil's Dictionary
text by Ambrose Bierce, 1911

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 03:00 AM

Just read Juan Cole's latest on the Turkmen and Tal Afar. Amazing what this administration can blunder into without the slightest consideration. What a mess.
Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 02:58 AM

I wonder what is the effect of Turkey start supplying turkmen. Turkey definitely has big interest controling the kurdish.

Posted by: wanda at September 15, 2004 03:00 AM

BTW

Nice work on the Hitler post, David.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 03:01 AM

see
mark twain
had his apprenticeship
behind him at my age and
i'm just starting mine.
the stories are mainly
still inside and
rattlin around.
i have written
a few tho.
wish i
had more
time to do it.

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 03:01 AM

Ladies and Gentlemen: The Rain Man
Actually, It's more like about 500-600 a week which is doable if you live in Queens or Brooklyn.
Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 02:44 AM

hmmm ...
$600 per week is $600 x 52 = $37,200 per year

assuming you can't sit two houses at once
$37,200 - $4,160 = $33,040

$33,040 / $10 = 3,304 dog walks
3,304 / 261 = 12.6 dogs per day

assuming dogs poop when you walk them ....

if average size dog is 30lbs ...
eats 20 lbs food per month + water + treats
even with high protien density food ... figure absorption rate of 75% at best ...

20lbs x 0.75 = 15lbs per dog-month

or ~ 0.5lbs per dog-day

thats 12.6 x 0.5 = 6.3lbs per day

So, for a "living wage in brooklyn" you can make it by bending over 12.6 times per day picking up 6.3lbs of dog shit ... over 3/4 ton per year ...

Damn! That sounds like a great job! Beats the shit out of what I'm doing!

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 03:02 AM

>>confirmed that Bush was arrested for cocaine possession

If W had been subject to the same drug laws he enacted as governor, he'd likely still be in jail today.

This is the best argument for drug criminalization I've ever run across.

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 03:03 AM

Good News:

The Majority Report will be single-handedly responsible for the defeat of the Porter Goss nomination.

Bad News:

The Michael Moore/Goss clip had to come to the attention of the Senate via a conversation on Air America instead of from mainstream media. Where was Fox on this? Come on, Fox!

Good news:

New AAR affiliates every week.

Posted by: lyingliar at September 15, 2004 03:03 AM

Sorry ... I couldn't resist ... I had the laptop in the crapper as I was typing that in ...

Now I really gotta go ... big day tommorrow ... earth falling into the sun again ...

adios for real folks ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 03:04 AM


>>I had the laptop in the crapper as I was typing that in ...Now I really gotta go


my computer makes me want to shit too...

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 03:06 AM

~~~ The terrorists would simply place conventional explosives on either end of the nuclear materials, slam them together, and produce a detonation ~~~

I'm sorry, but that's simply not true. Meaningless conjecture without knowing the slightest thing about the manner wherein materials are stored in Los Alamos. Fissible materials are, by their very definition, stored in small packets separated by large inert masses and sufficient distance.

Laughable rumor. Some people resort to this crap when the truth is scary enough.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:06 AM

Damn! That sounds like a great job! Beats the shit out of what I'm doing!

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 03:02 AM

Throw in that you're outdoors, get exercise, and can meet women on the job.

From what I've been told, you get used to picking up the poop.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 03:07 AM

I am a border-ruffian from the State of Missouri. I am a Connecticut Yankee by adoption. In me you have Missouri morals, Connecticut culture; this, gentlemen, is the combination which makes the perfect man.

I am the human race compacted and crammed into a single suit of clothes but quite able to represent its entire massed multitude in all its moods and inspirations.

M T

i gotta ways to go!

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 03:08 AM

>>you get used to picking up the poop.

You can invest in a pooper-scooper, it'd be deductable as a business expense

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 03:09 AM

Sorry ... I couldn't resist ... I had the laptop in the crapper as I was typing that in ...

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 03:04 AM
____________

Always figures you's full of shit, but now you is gone and confirmed our suspicions.

Ain't there no place for mystery nommores?

Or is it in the shitter, too?

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 03:10 AM

Passing out in 5, 4, 3, 2zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted by: chubby_bubba at September 15, 2004 03:11 AM

~~~ I wonder what is the effect of Turkey start supplying turkmen. Turkey definitely has big interest controling the kurdish. ~~~

That's true. And on top of it are US actions blatantly supporting the opposite... the Kurds controlling the Turkmen!

Turkey has already openly threatened the USA with a complete end of cooperation in the War on Terror. And the Turkish government actions are pale compared to general Turkish thoughts on this. We're inches from complete diplomatic withdrawal... something normally reserved for enemies in a time of war.

And Turkey is a MEMBER OF NATO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:13 AM

At times I seem to hear whisperings around me,
as if some that loved me were talking of me;
but when I would distinguish the words,
they cease,
and all is very still.
I know not whether these things rise in my brain,
or enter it from without.
I do not seek them;
they come,
and I let them go.

Posted by: Lilith at September 15, 2004 03:14 AM

BTW

Nice work on the Hitler post, David.

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 03:01 AM

____________

That there's an awful kind thing to say considerin' that I is been a real shit to you on the nat. sec. vs. econ. argument.

You is a magnanimous soul, Nasty.

Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 03:14 AM

Two sentences bear repeating. Juan Cole is so sharp that he doesn't include stuff like this to explain why he finds the Tal Afar situation so compelling. He figures its obvious, maybe.

We're inches from complete diplomatic withdrawal... something normally reserved for enemies in a time of war.

And Turkey is a MEMBER OF NATO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:20 AM

That there's an awful kind thing to say considerin' that I is been a real shit to you on the nat. sec. vs. econ. argument.


Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 03:14 AM

"If we didn't have such a high opinion of ourselves, we wouldn't be so easily insulted."

Schopenhauer

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 03:20 AM

re turks
geez that whole deal
is slidin under the
smokescreen aint it.
cept, we will watch eh?

dar says they playin
swift boat liars out
where she is steady,
(by the way, her
opinion of that
was realllly
colorful!)

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 03:21 AM

~~~ by the way, her
opinion of that
was realllly
colorful! ~~~

HAHAHAHAHA! I bet it WAS!

I'm jealous!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:22 AM

Eya WaW

evening bud

whats been fun lately?

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 03:24 AM

I am listening to Al Franken's interview of Kitty Kelley. I love Al, but he is a lousy interviewer. He hasn't asked Ms. Kelley any direct questions about the book. As usual the conversation ends up about him. It's that narcisistic celebrity thing.

Posted by: edna ellen poe at September 15, 2004 03:25 AM


+ *
+ * * *
* * * +
+
* * *

============================================== ----------------------------------------------
================================================

Posted by: !i at September 15, 2004 03:26 AM

I think Bush's "planners" (there's an oxymoron for ye) are still miffed at Turkey for not allowing us complete access to the North of Iraq via Turky at the start of the invasion. They aren't even informed enough to understand that what the Turkish government DID give us in that respect risked its immediate overthrow by the vast numbers of Turks who resented it completely.

Now, the Bush administration is trying to send a message? To Turkey?

Have they completely lost their marbles?

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:28 AM

ya know
took her 5 minutes
to ask about everybody
she even misses N!
WaW she give u
a bloggie
smoochie
too!

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 03:29 AM

I miss the biggest part of N. Just not that part that is so unlike the rest of him.

That make any sense whatsoever?

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:32 AM

"If we didn't have such a high opinion of ourselves, we wouldn't be so easily insulted."

Schopenhauer

Posted by: W@W at September 15, 2004 03:20 AM

-----

Is that there for pedagogic purposes? If so, I is afraid you're casting your pearls before swine, as I is too tie-red to figure out whether I am insulting or insulted or some combination of the two.

Night awl.

dr

Just for grins, here's a battery of Artie right back at ya:

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

Compassion is the basis of all morality.

Every person takes the limits of their own field of vision for the limits of the world.

If we were not all so interested in ourselves, life would be so uninteresting that none of us would be able to endure it.

Noise is the most impertinent of all forms of interruption. It is not only an interruption, but is also a disruption of thought.

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.

-- Arthur Schopenhauer


Posted by: dr at September 15, 2004 03:32 AM

Okay okay... I just caught up. It took me hours.

But I have nothing to say.

Shellfish is gone again, huh. I don't even read most of Dadalux's posts. Used to be just a bunch of quotes from smart people. Now it's a bunch of cheesy pics.

Come back Shelly. You can be in love with me, babe.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 03:33 AM

ya al does that
J & S too, though
not as much as they used to.
wonder if the ever listen to the
shows to refine their technique?

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 03:33 AM

And what's eating Nobody? Everyone around here is hating the phantom lead that Bush has and we're all getting a little emotional.

It's a good thing. I hope the polls show Bush in the lead the rest of the way, goddamn it. Throw them off their game a little. Maybe change their strategy. Make 'em not want to cheat so much.

Kerry is going to win this thing. And Bush and folks are going to complain like bitches for the rest of the year.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 03:38 AM

eya mel

evening bud

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 03:38 AM

~~~ J & S too, though
not as much as they used to.
wonder if the ever listen to the
shows to refine their technique? ~~~

That's why I'm so pleased with them when they got Professor Cole on. Not a hint of any of that narcisistic stuff. None of it. They're somehow transformed into accomplished journalists... like *poof*

Maybe they just mesh with him in some freaky way. I'm as impressed with S&J as I am with Cole!

Can't wait for them to get into this Turkmen thing!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:40 AM

Hey Jimmy. I'm watching the Iron Chef on the food network.

What are you up to?

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 03:40 AM

Mel,

~~~ And Bush and folks are going to complain like bitches for the rest of the year. ~~~

We can only hope that's the all of it!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:41 AM

~Everyone around here is hating the phantom lead that Bush has and we're all getting a little emotional.~

what's mercury doing?

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 03:42 AM

well mel
my guess is
N is regrouping,
lurkin, reassesing
his approach and data
refining his goals
planning and
evaluating
and catchin
up around the
castle and grounds

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 03:42 AM

mercury in interestin alignments
during the daytime, i watch it
every day, the planets rise
and set like the sun

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 03:46 AM

We can only hope that's the all of it!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:41 AM

Recounts and more recounts. Maybe a Thanksgiving weekend protest rally in washington. The stock market will tumble like a lead zeppelin.

But George and pals will concede for the good of the country come Christmas after Texas, Utah and Wyoming talk of succeding(sp) from the union. And Rush has a heart attack on air screaming about voter fraud and absentee ballots.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 03:47 AM

tell ya mel
i traded a lil ol
computer with linux on it
fer 20 lbs of smoked salmon
and ruzz an jaxxer are
helpin me with the
first split!

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 03:50 AM

We have NO relationship as important in the real War on Terror as is ours with Turkey. When Pakistan folds... and it will... Turkey will be ALL of the War on Terror.

They're that important. And we blatantly risk that relationship... for what?

It's like Woody Allen produced a war movie!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:50 AM

Salmon great for dogs!

Deer even eat it!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:52 AM

Jim,
What kind of box was it? And what type of linux do you like? What distro?

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 03:54 AM

Worlds away: Thought to be the first picture of an extrasolar planet, the red dot at left appears to orbit the brown dwarf in the center of this near-infrared image

http://www.betterhumans.com/News/news.aspx?articleID=2004-09-10-3

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 03:54 AM

Rush Limbaugh Becomes Official Unpaid Advisor to Bush-Cheney '04

September 13, 2004

I made an official announcement to open the program today. I have become, and have been for a while, an official, unpaid advisor to the Bush-Cheney '04 campaign, and we decided to go public with this because there's no problem with it whatsoever.

There was thought about my stepping down from the Golden EIB Microphone two or three days a week on the days that I was giving advice, but we decided not to do that. There's no conflict here. There's absolutely no conflict whatsoever. The line has been successfully blurring now for years and years and years.

I will not be giving up my precious seat behind the Golden EIB Microphone. I will continue to serve both functions with credibility on both sides, an official unpaid advisor to the Bush-Cheney reelection campaign '04, as well as your host here on the EIB Network.

Read the Articles
(Official Site of Bush-Cheney '04 Campaign - Officially Advised by Rush Limbaugh)
(New York Times: Bush Campaign Protests Two CNN Commentators' Ties to Kerry)
(Los Angeles Times: Kerry Campaign Team Still Looking for a Groove)

Posted by: Crayon at September 15, 2004 03:55 AM

More Professor Cole

"Luke Harding writes for The Guardian in Baghdad that a huge car bomb killed 47 and wounded 114 at the al-Karkh Police station. Targeted were prospective recruits to the police force."

http://www.juancole.com/

Didn't we... here on this blog figure out the importance of protecting those police recruits A MONTH AGO? More? And how easy it would be to do?

IDIOTS! MISMANAGING IDIOTS!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:57 AM

Space probes feel cosmic tug of bizarre forces

Robin McKie, science editor
Sunday September 12, 2004
The Observer

Something strange is tugging at America's oldest spacecraft. As the Pioneer 10 and 11 probes head towards distant stars, scientists have discovered that the craft - launched more than 30 years ago - appear to be in the grip of a mysterious force that is holding them back as they sweep out of the solar system.

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/sciences/story/0,12243,1302857,00.html

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 03:57 AM

~~~ Thought to be the first picture of an extrasolar planet ~~~

Breathtaking!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:59 AM

~~~ scientists have discovered that the craft - launched more than 30 years ago - appear to be in the grip of a mysterious force that is holding them back as they sweep out of the solar system ~~~

Its their mommy!

They forgot their lunches!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:00 AM

sunshine, hey...did you get the roe with the salmon? that's my favorite part...saw the first dragonfly of the season yesterday...between that and the festival at my neighborhood shrine i'm a bit melancholy with the coming of autumn...more than usual in an election year, i guess...

fishgrease, don't know if you saw but i was asked not to come back to the mosque by a young middle eastern guy...when i told an american friend about it, he said 'well you're not going to let hime *win* are you?'...i think that's why we don't care how turkey feels about us killing turkmen...you know what i mean?

mel, do you think bush will concede for the good of the country? i hope so, but i worry...

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:01 AM

IDIOTS! MISMANAGING IDIOTS!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 03:57 AM

yes.

just imagine.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 04:02 AM

I am listening to Al Franken's interview of Kitty Kelley. I love Al, but he is a lousy interviewer. He hasn't asked Ms. Kelley any direct questions about the book. As usual the conversation ends up about him. It's that narcisistic celebrity thing.
Posted by: edna ellen poe at September 15, 2004 03:25 AM //

I got the feeling Al is trying to tell a story that kitty kelly will pick up.

Posted by: wanda at September 15, 2004 04:02 AM

~~~ Rush Limbaugh Becomes Official Unpaid Advisor to Bush-Cheney '04 ~~~

We're in trouble now!

Look what Limbaugh did for Monday Night Football!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:03 AM

Jenise,

~~~ fishgrease, don't know if you saw but i was asked not to come back to the mosque by a young middle eastern guy ~~~

I did see that. I was under the impression he was duly concerned for your safety. But that he would need to be, even if that's the case! Yes! My my... what a disaster this President is!

Let him win? Hey jenise... look at what Bush is doing... let the middle eastern guy win!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:09 AM

mel, do you think bush will concede for the good of the country? i hope so, but i worry...

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:01 AM

I think he'll be forced to. I think whichever way it goes. They steal it. Or we kick his sorry butt. There will be trouble. (right here in river city)

I think that what Al and Dem senators saw in 2000 was that we can't split the country and The house and the senate and the supreme court down the middle without a little bloodshed, protests marches that turn into riots.

I see bad shit ahead no matter which way it goes. But whoever has the short stick will be told to concede by the real powers that be.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 04:10 AM

fishgrease,
my sense was that there were a myriad of reasons/emotions behind what the guy at the mosque was saying...i was frustrated with my friend in california...

"Let him win? Hey jenise... look at what Bush is doing... let the middle eastern guy win!"

exactly my thoughts, exactly...it was heartbreaking somehow that my friend couldn't see this...*sigh* i may be oversimplifying, but this seems at the root of this vicious cycle to me...
how's your wyoming nightscape tonight?

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:13 AM

Look what Limbaugh did for Monday Night Football!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:03 AM

That was Dennis Miller. Rush was on ESPN and thought the best player in the league was over-rated because he was black. What a racist little bitch!!

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 04:13 AM

Mel,

~~~ And Rush has a heart attack on air screaming about voter fraud and absentee ballots. ~~~

His head explodes and his ear implants go tinkling across the studio floor!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:15 AM

~~~ That was Dennis Miller. Rush was on ESPN and thought the best player in the league was over-rated because he was black. What a racist little bitch!! ~~~

Damn! You're right!

A perfect line ruined by inaccuracy! When I use it at work tomorrow, I'll get it right. You just saved me a heap of embarrasment!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:18 AM

Jim,
What kind of box was it? And what type of linux do you like? What distro?

eya mel
dis was an ol used one
pentium 3 400 on a ol
all in one board
maybe 5 years old
used mandrake 8.1
cuzz M board so old
started with Corel
went to red hat,
mandrake,and a few
others i mainly run
suse for the big box
and knoppix when i have
to fix or recover stuff.
on other boxes (dats what
i'd start ya out on!)if
the hard drive spins
i can usually find
the data eh?

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 04:19 AM

"I see bad shit ahead no matter which way it goes. But whoever has the short stick will be told to concede by the real powers that be."

mel, yeah unfortunately, that's what i see, too...just have a real bad feeling that bush will maybe not concede to the real powers that be quite so quietly...that first image of the congress men and women and their petition or whatever at the beginning of F911 still makes me cry...

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:20 AM

Jenise,

~~~ how's your wyoming nightscape tonight? ~~~

Cold, last time I checked.

So much at stake on November 2nd.

So much!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:20 AM

Knoppix boots and runs off a CD, eh?

Clever!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:22 AM

"So much at stake on November 2nd."

yes...have to admit to being a little scared (not that that will stop me)...we cannot afford to lose this one. we can't.

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:23 AM

~~~ not that that will stop me ~~~

Me either. Gots my plans all made for Nevada. Already been talking to my Super out there.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:24 AM

fishgrease, are you going to nevada to register voters or to canvass?

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:25 AM

Although the shadowy Monotheism and Holy War (MAHW) organization tried to take credit for the Baghdad bombing, it most likely was committed by Iraqi nationalists. It is not clear whether these post-Baath nationalists are using MAHW as a screen, or whether MAHW is grandstanding and just taking credit, or whether American intelligence organizations are using MAHW as plot device that allows the Bush administration to continue to link Iraq and al-Qaeda. (Actually, anyway, Monotheism and Holy War is a rival to al-Qaeda that refuses to share resources with it, so even if it exists it doesn't prove an al-Qaeda link to Iraq).

-- Juan Cole

Always thinking three steps ahead is our Professor!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:26 AM

one last question all before i get back to my preparations...is this nader on the florida ballot thing going to stand? has anyone heard the latest?

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:27 AM

Jim,

I have Knoppix and Suse on discs but I never play with them. I should really "Do something" with knoppix. I just can't get on the net with it on my current box (Not much faster PIII than what you traded) I had Redhat for alittle while. I mean a short while but I coundn't fit it on the box I had back then. So I played around with the prompt a little. I had a book. Couldn't get the GUI. I really want to learn about Linux and maybe get a cert in it.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 04:27 AM

Look what Limbaugh did for Monday Night Football!
Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:03 AM//

How long till Bush start saying some seriously stupid stuff like Rush?

Posted by: wanda at September 15, 2004 04:28 AM

that first image of the congress men and women and their petition or whatever at the beginning of F911 still makes me cry...

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:20 AM

Don't cry Jen. It's going to be okay in the end. There is always pain in growth and I think we're going to have to do some growing. We are a young country.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 04:31 AM

"How long till Bush start saying some seriously stupid stuff like Rush?"

wanda, the line between the two seems pretty thin already...wuoldn't think it would take long...

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:32 AM

eya lil j

useta like fresh roe myself!
would have 5 gal buckets
i'd give to my trout
fishin buddies!
this is firm
smoked sockeye
was a good trade
150 in parts and
a day to build it
and is it delicious!
eya near 6 am yer time
u up all nite? Oh Yeah!
next time comp crashes
get a hold a me before
getting drastic, have
saved a few over the
phone ocassionally!
u need a good linux
box if yer losin
weeks of work!

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 04:34 AM

mel, you're right of course...and we are very young...did you know there's a kimono shop in 'downtown' kyoto that's been standing in the same spot run by the same family for 440 years? and we think we know everything there is to know about everything...you know?

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:35 AM

When Bush gets angry or backed into a hard question he starts blurting some wild shit. I think if JFK sticks him a little bit with something that happened in the last 4 years (as opposed to 35 years) he will drop that pretense and behave like the bully he is.

I'm not saying he'll lose any votes over it. His base is pretty thickheaded. But I'm sure we have enough votes already.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 04:36 AM

~~~ fishgrease, are you going to nevada to register voters or to canvass? ~~~

I can't go until the last week in October so I'm just going to do whatever they need done. I figger Gofer and Chauffeur. I'm taking my wife's new SUV which seats 10 so I'll be giving rides to the polls on the 2nd. Makes me feel a little less guilty about having it.

I'm also hauling a flatbed railed trailer out so I think I'm going to be moving PA systems and such around most of the time. They say it all helps.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:37 AM

~~~ is this nader on the florida ballot thing going to stand? has anyone heard the latest? ~~~

Who knows? Its the Kerry org's first test.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:40 AM

"get a hold a me before
getting drastic, have
saved a few over the
phone ocassionally!
u need a good linux
box if yer losin
weeks of work!"

i will, sunshine...seriously thought about throwing the damn thing off the roof! i don't know what a linux box is...i'm using a mac...think it's a problem with the adobe premiere software...anyway, have decided to let it go for the moment...the election is the more immediate concern right now...
last night went to buy cigarettes and there were four tiny frogs suctioned to the front of the vending machine...attracted to the light, i guess? wanted to write a haiku about it for you, but couldn't find a way to fit 'vending machine' in...lol

should go soon if i'm to make the last hours of the shrine festival...
no new information on florida anyone?

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:41 AM

I think their whole campaign is truly geared toward getting us not to vote at all. The less we turn out the more of a chance that Bush has.

They've got the guns but We've got the numbers. We're gonna win yeah we're taking over.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 04:41 AM

~~~ is this nader on the florida ballot thing going to stand ~~~

Its gonna go to the Florida Supreme Court by sometime next week. The US Supreme court has already warned them not to bring it there.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:42 AM

frog a koo

a vending machine
and four suction froggies eh?
that is a tuff one

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 04:44 AM

AAR could use EVERY show on the air to become the NETWORK of Official Unpaid AdvisorS to Kerry/Edwards '04. Seems like the the dems would all begin to tow one line. The one coming through all the various AAR hosts from Kerry/Edwards and the DNC. They'd have to start now though.

Posted by: Crayon at September 15, 2004 04:44 AM

- When Bush gets angry or backed into a hard question he starts blurting some wild shit. -

Posted by: Mel
==============
THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

MODERATOR: Mr. Kerry, the first question of the evening goes to you. Do you feel that the intercontinental ballistic missle maximum throw-weight as origninally set in the failed SALT II treaty is an appropriate starting point for discussions with North Korea, and why?

KERRY: Thank you, Mr. Moderator. Blah blah blah etc.

MODERATOR: Thank you, Mr. Kerry. And now to you, President Bush. What is your earliest childhood memory and can you tell the audience why this is important to you?

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 04:44 AM

why does the us supreme court say don't bring it there? i mean what is their justification?

the american trait of 'taking action' is what will save us, i think...

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:45 AM

Ilo... LMAO

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 04:46 AM

"frog a koo"

LOL...LOL...: ))
i knew you could do it, sunshine! laughed as much when i saw them there as when i read your haiku...perfect, thank you

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:47 AM

ilo, you're here? nice one about the debates...afraid i'm on my way out the door again...but let me ask first, how are you doing today?

(sunshine, it's 6pm right now.)

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 04:49 AM

~~~ why does the us supreme court say don't bring it there? ~~~

Well, they've a good reason. This one is about State law only. The Republicans are the only ones who would want to take it there anyway. The State Court will be VERY hesitant to overrule the Judge who has alsready knocked Nader off the ticket. That Judge is very confident because of the 4 or 5 requirements to be on the ballot, Nader has exactly zero.

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:51 AM

I don't think Nader in Florida is as bad as say Nader in Ohio or PA or Nevada. I think those old ladies that vote in droves will know the deal. He had a rally down there and more people came to see his vice pres than him. I have quite a few friends in Florida. I used to live there two years ago, mostly South Fla and they're pretty smart down there. Nevermind that hanging chad bullshit.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 04:51 AM

hee hee!


both doggerz in my lap
goin hey less go to
bed it's cold tonite!
g'nite u all! good luck j
swing up an visit if u can!

over, i'm out...................*

Posted by: Sunshine Jim at September 15, 2004 04:52 AM

ilo!

Greatness!

I gotta sleep, folks. Nite all! Power to the people!

Posted by: Fishgrease at September 15, 2004 04:53 AM

Goodnight everybody.
Enjoy the rest of your day Jen.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 04:54 AM

Hi Jenise!

Yeah, I'm ok ok ok, I guess. Had a big ol' argument with W@W up-blog 'cause I've been worrying about the near-term future in ways that make some people think I am nutty.

Also - I stole some time from my employer this afternoon and wrote a big essay in response to a troll complaining about "judicial activism" -- but by the time I posted, it got stuck in the rinds of the blog (at the bottom just before a new page started up). So - I think no one read what I'd put all that work into -- and then I had to get back to work.

How are you? The weather come in bad where you live? When do you fly to darkest Ohio?

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 04:54 AM

(whisperzzzzz..... repost it ilo!)

Posted by: The Phanthom Snorkelbutt at September 15, 2004 04:57 AM

If you read this article about the poor woman getting fired from her job because of a Kerry sticker in her car window

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/9/13/22340/7080

Then you may want to know how to get hold of the nasty boss, to let him know what you think:

http://www.pgeddes.com/

phil@pgeddes.com

Posted by: Dylan at September 15, 2004 04:58 AM

Good night Mr. Fish!
Good night, Sunshine!
Good night (good evening) Jenise!

Mel -- are you still here?

And - what really happened to Nobody? I miss him.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 04:58 AM

George W. Bush was weaned from his mothers breast prematurely and received too little attention from his father.


Posted by: Hannibal at September 15, 2004 04:58 AM

goodnight, mel...see you soon.
goodnight, fishgrease...kick some ass (most politely, of course) in nevada...understand about supreme court...
goodnight, sunshine...if you get the chance, try 'mentaiko' spaghetti...mentaiko is the eggs of another kind of fish, i don't know which one (they're small, dark red, crunchy, spicy)...mix butter in with cooked pasta, top with mentaiko and cut-up dried seaweed...very good.


ilo, i'm constantly messing up the timing on the blog...can be frustrating, yeah? the weather here is pretty good now...seven taiphoons already this year and lots of flooding...nature is pissed...
i'm better, thanks...and by the way, i'm as worried about the near future as you are (it's even crossed my mind that i may not be able to get myself back to japan - you know?)...fly to california this coming tuesday...then to ohio until the end of october...don't know how i can best help, but will do what i can...

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 05:03 AM

oops, that was me up there...

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 05:03 AM

I'm still hanging on Ilo.

TV gets so bad when 5 am rolls around I just watch music videos.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 05:04 AM

George W. Bush was weaned from his mothers breast prematurely and received too little attention from his father.
Posted by: Hannibal at September 15, 2004 04:58 AM

I tend to think too many of his brain cells were burned up while using cocaine.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 05:07 AM

See you in October, Jen.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 05:07 AM

...nature is pissed...

I saw a story with a picture in the NYTimes about how the animals don't come back to the tundra in Alaska now, and the ones that do are very sick and the whole thing might have once been avoidable if President Carter's promise of solar technology had been followed 25 years ago - but Reagan came in and de-funded the research; and the oil tyrants don't seem to have any sense of responsibility or humility or kindness. It is scary - but what makes me more angry is how it really didn't have to be this way at all.

The typhoons did not hurt your house, where you live?

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 05:08 AM

“I waited in the car as U.S. soldiers set up a roadblock at a major intersection. An angry American hollered at an Iraqi officer not to let any vehicles through. ‘I decide when the cars come,’ he yelled. The Iraqi cop wasn't having any of it, and he began yelling back in Arabic until a second U.S. officer calmed them both. Just then a convoy of U.S. armored vehicles charged by. An armored tow truck was pulling a still-blazing Bradley fighting vehicle through the intersection, spreading oily residue in its wake. Some of those who had been blocked at the intersection got out of their cars to cheer. Others angrily honked their horns and ordered the celebrants to get back into their cars -- not in defense of the Americans, but because they simply are sick of the bloodshed.”
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04258/378681.stm

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 05:10 AM

"how it really didn't have to be this way at all."

so true, ilo...true for the environment, true for politics...
we survived the taiphoons fine, but the earthquakes afterward cracked the outside wall a little...not a big deal, though...
really must go now, if i'm to catch the end of festival...
see you later, ilo...we just have to keep fighting...

looking forward to it, mel!

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 05:11 AM

Tell me where Nobody is and why he went off into hiding, and if you see him please tell him I miss him, okay?

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 05:13 AM

Okay - Jenise. I am glad your house is not hurt too badly and you are okay. Talk again later, okay?

Bye - for now.
:)

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 05:14 AM

He posted something yesterday during the show and then disappeared but I didn't see him today.

Have you gone to nobody's site, Ilo?

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 05:15 AM

Yeah - I did go to that site once or twice, but it's confusing to me, because there's no search mechanism and everything is just listed by date, so I couldn't see any way to really get any good out of it for me. And once I sent him an email, because his email address is at his site, but later he told me he never checks his email from there. Anyway, if you saw him earlier, that's good. I was worried that he got out-of-sorts and went into hiding. He's like has some funny moods I think, but I still kind of like him posting here. Kind of less spicy without him.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 05:19 AM

He loves arguing with them trolls. But sometimes he lets it get to him a little too much. We used to get into it a little. I miss him too but he'll be back. I think he's just showing us how life is without him.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 05:23 AM

http://ntopiaproject.blogspot.com

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 05:25 AM

http://www.monolithic.com/construction/index.html

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 05:28 AM

http://www.co.pend-oreille.wa.us/Default.htm

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 05:29 AM

Yeah - he's a big-time bother, actually, because he seems always to need to have people say, like, "Oooh! Nobody is so smart!", but why bother, because he should know he is smart and not care anyway. But, alot of guys act like that and I never understand it. Anyway - his ego sometimes is a pain in the neck for me; but now that he's been gone I miss him. Whatever! Anyway - I just don't want to think his feelings are hurt, because - you know - that type has really thin skin.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 05:29 AM

okay I'm going to try to get to sleep. Tomorrow is another day. Goodnight Ilo. Goodnight Lurkers and no nics.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 05:30 AM

Hey Mel, nice to chat a bit with you to night.
See you another time, okay?
Good night.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 05:34 AM

Nobody's fine... He's a grown ass man.

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 05:34 AM

Night

Posted by: Mel at September 15, 2004 05:35 AM

Yeah - ok - so you say. But I have dated a couple of older men, and to me, all of them are just little boys inside, each and every one of them. I sometimes don't think boys ever grow up. GWB - that's a fine example. And Clinton? I like him, but he's just a little boy, too. Guys give themselves so much freaking credit ... but I don't care. If they're not out there hurting other people, most of them are intersting enough.

Ok, Mel - and you, making sexist comments all the time, but I don't care, really. Harmless.

Anyway. Good night, Mel. Sweet dreams.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 05:38 AM

Good night, Nobody.
You will be back.
I know it.

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 05:39 AM

boopboopboopboopboop!

G'nite, blog!

Posted by: ilo at September 15, 2004 05:51 AM

+ *.* * + *.* .+ .* *..+**.+**
++.*..+*..+**.+**++.*.+ *.* .+ .*.* *..
+**.+**+..
. *..+**.+**++.
very cool video presentation ~ free download.

http://www.pharmacratic-inquisition.com/nontesters/pharmacratic/

~

Thousands of years ago, in the pre monarchic era, psychedelic/entheogenic substances were publicly known world wide, and respected for their ability to bring forth the divine, Yahweh, God, The Great Spirit, etc. by the many cultures who used them.

Often the entire tribe or community would partake in the Entheogenic rites. These rites were often used in initiation into adulthood, for healing, to help guide the community in the decision process, and to bring the direct religious experience to anyone seeking it, that might take these psychedelic sacraments properly.

In the pre literate world, the knowledge of psychedelic plant sacraments, as well as fertility rites and astrological knowledge surrounding the sun, stars, and Zodiac, known as Astrotheology, were anthropomorphized into human/god like beings so their stories and practices could be passed down for generations.


+ *.* * + *.* .+ .*
*..+**.+**++.*..+*..+**.+**++.*.+ *
. * .+ .*.* *..+**.+**+..

Posted by: The New World Order Ladies Choir (don't tell anyone we told you this) at September 15, 2004 06:14 AM

+ *.* * + *.* .+ .* *..+**.+**
++.*..+*..+**.+**++.*.+ *.* .+ .*.* *..
+**.+**+..
. *..+**.+**++.

As years became centuries, and centuries turned into millenniums, many of the ancient shamanic practices were lost, or were kept from the people by the priesthood, becoming myth and power hungry dogmatic religion.

Many of these ancient entheogenic, sun and fertility rites are still practiced today, though the knowledge of their origins, cause, and purpose is all but lost except by a remaining few.

Sects were created that kept the secrets of the direct religious experience from the common people.

Sometimes this was done by the power hungry (i.e. Catholic Church) to maintain power, and other times this was done by shaman themselves to keep tradition alive.

Crusades were fought, Inquisitions were enacted, and the so-called "Pagan" or country people lost their lives for their Shamanic beliefs. This happened not only in Europe and the Middle East, but in the Americas under the Spanish Inquisition as well.

For centuries the ruling churches hypocritically used the knowledge of the psychedelic substances and astrology for themselves, and may still do so to this very day.


http://www.pharmacratic-inquisition.com/nontesters/pharmacratic/

+ *.* * + *.* .+ .*
*..+**.+**++.*..+*..+**.+**++.*.+ *
. * .+ .*.* *..+**.+**+..

Posted by: The New World Order Ladies Choir (we absolutely adore entheogens) at September 15, 2004 06:17 AM

+ *.* * + *.* .+ .*
*..+**.+**++.*..+*..+**.+**++.*.+ *
Pharmacratic Inquisition nov. verb.

- The Christian persecution of archaic religions based on sacramental ingestion of entheogenic plants and the consequent personal access to ecstatic states; whose first great victory was the destruction of the Eleusinian Mysteries at the end of the fourth century; which then reached a gruesome climax in the persecution of witches in the Middle Ages; and which continues in today's Pharmacratic State in the guise of a public health 'War on Drugs.'
++.*..+*..+**.+**++.*.+ *.* .+ .*.* *..
+**.+**+..
. *..+**.+**++.

Posted by: The New World Order Ladies Choir (d.a.r.e. to be informed) (just say know) at September 15, 2004 06:22 AM

++.*..+*..+**.+**++.*.+ *.* .+ .*.* *..
+**.+**+..
. *..+**.+**++.

Illegal Drugs fund terrorism and helped fund 9/11?

Posted by: Richard at September 14, 2004 08:16 PM

***

oil and drug money are the life support system keeping our entire financial system afloat.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tracking the covert history of CIA drug smuggling from Nicaragua to Arkansas and South Central Los Angeles, GNN sheds light on the darkest secret of the Agency's operational directorate.

http://gnn.tv/crack/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Big Oil and the War on Drugs and Terrorism

The "Big Oil" chessgame, aided and abetted by the so-called wars on drugs and terrorism, has made most of humanity its pawns and has expanded corporate control over our lives.

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/OilDrugsTerrorism.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

AFGHAN OPIUM PRODUCTION DOUBLES

December 11, 2003 100 PDT (FTW) -- Ever wonder why the markets are doing so well? As FTW has documented for years, with almost $600 billion in drug money being laundered through Wall Street and US banks, the markets should be improving. According to CNN, opium production in Afghanistan is 36 times higher than at the end of Taliban rule. Not every US policy overseas is a failure...

http://fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/121103_afghan_poppy.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Despite laws that punish marijuana cultivation more strictly than murder in some states, Americans spend more on illegal drugs than on cigarettes.

Although the official American economy has been suffering a downturn, the shadow economy is enjoying unprecedented levels of success, much in the way that the prohibition period fuelled the illegal markets in the 30s.

While the nation's largest legal cash crop, maize, produces about $19bn (£11.9bn) in revenue, "plausible" estimates for the value of marijuana crops reach $25bn. Steve White, a former coordinator for t

Posted by: The New World Order Ladies Choir (money laundering inc.) at September 15, 2004 06:36 AM

so now suddenly bush is worried about the exploitation of people? (mining at nobody's)

Bush Orders Sanctions Against Venezuela

By GEORGE GEDDA
Associated Press Writer

September 10, 2004, 7:16 PM EDT

WASHINGTON -- President Bush on Friday ordered a partial cut in U.S. assistance to Venezuela because of its alleged role in the international trafficking of women and children for sexual exploitation.

The action means the United States will not support $250 million in Venezuelan loan requests expected to come before international lending institutions during the next fiscal year, a State Department official said.
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/wire/sns-ap-us-venez

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 06:53 AM

...While the nation's largest legal cash crop, maize, produces about $19bn (£11.9bn) in revenue, "plausible" estimates for the value of marijuana crops reach $25bn. Steve White, a former coordinator for the US drug enforcement administration's cannabis eradication programme, estimates that the drug is now the country's largest cash crop.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,947880,00.html

Posted by: The New World Order Ladies Choir (and welcoming committee) at September 15, 2004 06:55 AM

....


What made those scenes from Beslan so anguishing for me was that I had seen them all before. As a wartime surgeon in Chechnya I had treated the broken bodies of children - the young girl whose parents were blown up by a bomb before her eyes, the little boy whose hair turned white overnight, small bodies pierced by hundreds of pieces of shrapnel. And everywhere blood.

The scenes at Beslan weren't so unfamiliar
Khassan Baiev The Boston Globe

http://www.iht.com/bin/print.php?file=538399.html

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 06:55 AM

(bowing to the ladies choir, but not entirely sure if they're welcoming me) ; )

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 06:57 AM

CNN , worthless bags of cat shit.

from:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/14/michigan.poll/index.html

Poll: Michigan too close to call
(CNN) -- The race between Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry and President Bush is too close to call in the battleground state of Michigan, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Tuesday evening.

Among likely voters surveyed, Kerry was the choice of 50 percent, with 44 percent for Bush and 1 percent for independent Ralph Nader. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

Among registered voters, Kerry was at 50 percent, Bush at 43 percent and Nader still at 1 percent.

_______________________________________________

If Bush was ahead in Michigan CNN would report;

Bush has 7 percentage point lead in Michgan

regardless of what the margin of error.

Posted by: Ajax at September 15, 2004 06:58 AM

good morning jenise,

just popping in to post while I'm watching this excellent video on the christian 'appropriation' of pagan symbology and wisdom.

bookmark it for when you've got two hours to watch.

http://www.pharmacratic-inquisition.com/nontesters/pharmacratic/


thank you for your wonderful blog!

Posted by: The New World Order Ladies Choir (office of deprogramming) at September 15, 2004 07:02 AM

Bush Orders Sanctions Against Venezuela
September 10, 2004, 7:16 PM EDT
WASHINGTON -- President Bush on Friday ordered a partial cut in U.S. assistance to Venezuela because of its alleged role in the international trafficking of women and children for sexual exploitation.

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/wire/sns-ap-us-venez
Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 06:53 AM

Bush is seriously petty. 200M?
If venezuela decides to stop their oil pump. We gonna pay that 200M in about 20 minutes flat in gas pump.

It's bad enough Bush botches two coup attempts and a failed recall in Venezuela, now he has to embarrash us with being petty too.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 07:06 AM

good morning, ladies...you are very, very welcome...i've bookmarked it...i'll watch when i get a chance..thanks

suppression and pettiness...seems to be the order of the day, huh?

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 07:11 AM

>: (

One of the marines assigned to guard duty at Guantánamo in 2003, who has since left the military, told me, after being promised anonymity, that he and his enlisted colleagues at the base were encouraged by their squad leaders to "give the prisoners a visit" once or twice a month, when there were no television crews, journalists, or other outside visitors at the prison. 

"We tried to fuck with them as much as we could - inflict a little bit of pain. We couldn't do much," for fear of exposure, the former marine, who also served in Afghanistan, told me. 

Rumsfeld's dirty war on terror 

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6898.htm

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 07:15 AM

i hate this man...truly despise him...but thank you, nobody, and you too ladies for the links
see you all later

Mr Rumsfeld told reporters on Friday he had approved the use of harsh interrogation measures, but that they had only been meant for Guantánamo. He said the measures ought to be contrasted with those of terrorists. "Does it rank up there with chopping someone's head off on television?" he asked. "It doesn't."


Bush team 'knew of abuse' at Guantánamo
http://www.guardian.co.uk/guantanamo/story/0,13743,1303105,00.html

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 07:21 AM

While the United States mourns the death of more than 1,000 soldiers since the U.S.-led invasion last year, Iraqis complain that little attention is being paid to the staggering number of their own dead.

According to statistics compiled by Iraq's Health Ministry, 3,186 civilian Iraqis have been killed since April of this year alone, in violence and lawlessness across the country.

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=6219199

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 07:27 AM

morning ladies, miss jenise, ajax,

I'm watching democracy now's coverage of last year's miami ftaa protests.

Medea Benjamin (one of the protesters in the RNC during bush's speech) was there, and mentions that $8 million dollars from the $87 billion iraq fund was used to pay the security forces in miami.

police fired rubber bullets and other fun stuff into the crowds. protecting ftaa important. protecting people, well...

http://www.democracynow.org/static/miamimodel.shtml

Posted by: nebulous at September 15, 2004 07:30 AM

i like you nickless, nobody.

without labels, we are forced to rely on other identifying features, other senses. keeps us sharp for hunting and surviving.

this is 4u:

* *** *** *** *** *

nobody knows your trouble

he loves to burst your bubble

of narrow perspective

with liberal invective

beware right hand, his stunt double.

Posted by: nebulous at September 15, 2004 07:44 AM

ol' sunshiney jim wise shaman

wizard of psychedelic stamen

when tensions arise

shadow dons his disguise

yub the alien brings peace. amen.

Posted by: nebulous at September 15, 2004 07:54 AM

Good Morning Neb and whoever else is on.
Sorry I missed Jenise.

Imus is interviewing Kerry and it has been very interesting because as "out there" as Imus is, he let Kerry talk and asked very good questions.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 07:58 AM

with fishgrease we've all truly lucked

we laughed at the lies he debunked

novak got served

the peace map's been swerved

and hannity knows that he's fucked

Posted by: nebulous at September 15, 2004 07:59 AM

Neb,
You're becoming our poet.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 08:01 AM

good morning toni,

hope you're well today, in spite of the 'final days of rome' vibe.

where do you listen to imus?

who's imus?

Posted by: nebs at September 15, 2004 08:04 AM

I find limericks totally annoying, but they're addicting once you get involved.

i'm convinced it's the gateway drug leading to harder, more destructive writing ~ journalism and advertising.


anyway:

war dog, well, what can you say?

he blesses us day after day

his cynical conjecture

painting sad kerry picture

can't hide that he just wants to play

Posted by: nebs at September 15, 2004 08:10 AM

Imus: "Sen. Kerry, you voted to give the President authority to go to War with Saddam.

Sen. Kerry: "Don, We were dealing with the UN and the inspectors in Iraq looking for WMD. We voted to give the President the authority to use as a threat to Saddam to allow the inspectors in. We. the Senate advised the President to allow the inspectors to finish their inspections in Iraq, but the President and the admin had other ideas.
They rushed to war without any plan for the Peace. We were trying to tell him that he needed to wait to build the Allies and a plan for after the war."
As you should know, I am paraphrasing from my poor memory. He said so much. But at least he had a chance to talk.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 08:11 AM

Neb,
Imus in the Morning is on MSNBC. He gave Kerry almost 20 minutes and asked all the questions I wanted to. Maybe they will have transcripts later, I'm hoping.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 08:13 AM

what's up dadaluxe, my man?

can things get much stranger ~ they can

life's short, time is art

living from your heart,

fulfilling the great Dog's plan

Posted by: nebule at September 15, 2004 08:15 AM

phungus and celt with your rot

some advice from kurt vonnegut,

if foulness you spew

you'll be heard by few,

but at least you gave it a shot

Posted by: nebs at September 15, 2004 08:19 AM

Stop Congress from Stripping Power from the Judicial Branch

Congress is attempting to once again seize power from the judicial branch with highly controversial legislation that would prohibit all federal courts established by Congress from even hearing cases concerning the Pledge of Allegiance and the First Amendment.   Rather than spending the few weeks left this session on legislation designed to address the many critically issues facing our country, the Republican leadership is planning to fast-track this proposed legislation to the House floor.

---
Take Action!  Urge your Representative to oppose this overreaching legislation.

 Congress seems to be addicted to court-stripping. Congress seems to be suffering from court-stripping fever this year. In addition to H.R. 2028 and the Marriage Protection Act passed earlier this year, we have seen proposals to strip the courts of jurisdiction to hear cases on the Ten Commandments and, almost laughingly, all cases that are "religious freedom-related." We must stop this dangerous trend now before we see proposals to strip the courts on everything from gun control to abortion.

http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeSpeech.cfm?ID=16436&c=42

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 08:23 AM

tonid, just here for a second...how are you feeling this morning? did you get some sleep last night? i hope so.

nebulous, nice...really, really nice

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 08:25 AM

The good news just keeps rolling in...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CBS: Bush Poll Numbers Up


United Press International


Weakening support among Democrats for presidential nominee John Kerry has contributed to the 7-point lead President Bush now enjoys in major polls.

A new CBS poll of registered voters indicates nine out of 10 Republican respondents will vote for Bush, while only eight of 10 Democratic respondents will vote for Kerry.

CBS attributes Bush's newfound lead to two major factors: a spike in the president's approval ratings with respect to his handling of the war on terror and an increase in the public's negative perceptions of his Democratic challenger.

Bush's 7-point deficit among women before the Republican National Convention has now been converted to a 5-point lead, and his 7-point advantage among men has now grown to 15 points. He has also made significant gains among independent voters


http://www.wbex.com/script/headline_newsmanager.php?id=346323&pagecontent=nationalnews&feed_id=59

Posted by: War Dog [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 08:33 AM

Hi Jenise,
Thanks for asking. Last night I was finally able to sleep well. Sorry I got on too late to talk.
Was just going up blog to see what was discussed.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 08:36 AM

A lifetime of work will be remembered for this mistake!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A Rather false story

With questions of typography, superscript and proportional spacing filtering through cyberspace over the past week, it seems fairly clear that the memos CBS revealed on "60 Minutes II" are in fact forgeries. Allegedly written by the late Col. Jerry Killian, the memos' supporters hope they will strengthen the case against President Bush — that he received preferential treatment and that he disobeyed direct orders while in the Air National Guard during the Vietnam War. Yet efforts to prove the memos' authenticity fail on two major levels.

http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20040913-090118-2497r.htm

Posted by: War Dog [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 08:36 AM

Good news is I spoke to my nephew again and he is not voting for Bush. We had a long talk and he thinks this country is moving in the wrong direction. He is still not sold on Kerry. My nephew is a centrist, as I am, but wants the old Repub party back. He thinks that the DEms are to far left also. I tend to agree at times.
Where oh where are the old parties.
We need the centrists back. Negotiate for the betterment of the nation.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 08:39 AM

September 10, 2004

Bush Poll Numbers Continue to Soar

There is no way to spin this as anything but incredible news for the president and horrible news for John Kerry. After a near flawless convention the Bush numbers are soaring through the roof according to the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll.

First, the President leads John kerry 52%-43% among likely voters. And the underlying numbers are incredible.

Trust to Handle the Issues

Issue

Terrorism---Bush 57% Kerry 35%

Iraq---Bush 53% Kerry 37%

Economy---Bush 47% Kerry 43%

Education---Bush 46% Kerry 42%

Jobs---Bush 43% Kerry 45%


Here is the post convention bump...


Bush job approval at 52%

"Clearer stand on issues": Bush up 27% over Kerry

"Stronger leader": Bush up 27% over Kerry

"Make country safer": Bush up 19% over Kerry

Trust to handle terrorism: Bush up 22% over Kerry

Trust to handle Iraq: Bush up 16%

President Bush has not only defined John Kerry as indecisive, but has also defined the race.

http://www.washingtondispatch.com/page2/archives/000565.html

Posted by: War Dog [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 08:52 AM

Kitty Litter
Kitty Kelley's excuse for why she doesn't have a tape of her conversation with Sharon Bush.
by Rachel DiCarlo
09/15/2004 12:00:00 AM

ON PAGE 266 of her new book The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty, Kitty Kelley writes, "[The president's] sister-in-law Sharon Bush alleged that [George W. Bush] has snorted cocaine with one of his brothers at Camp David during the time their father was President of the United States. 'Not once,' she said. 'but many times.'"

The accusation is serious since the president said during his 2000 campaign that he hadn't used illegal drugs for 25 years, and had embraced a sober, religious lifestyle in 1986. His father took office in January 1989.

On the Today Show yesterday Matt Lauer, interviewing Kelley, asked her why she didn't tape record the conversation with Sharon Bush. Kelley replied that tape recorders don't work well in restaurants--there's too much noise. "It's a restaurant. I mean, it's really har--have you ever done that?"

Recalling the meeting in her author's note on page xxv Kelley writes, "[Sharon Bush and I agreed to meet on April 1, 2003, at a quiet restaurant. When I arrived, the Chelsea Bistro on West Twenty-Third Street was empty." So, Kelley was unable to get the conversation on a tape recorder because they ate a "quiet" and "empty" restaurant where the noise was so loud that it precluded the use of one.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/626coxfj.asp

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 08:54 AM

September 15, 2004
Vote Drives Gain Avid Attention of Youth in '04
By TIMOTHY EGAN

ORTLAND, Ore. - Four years ago, the presidential election was not even white noise to Marie Reyes. She had bigger concerns, like, um, anything except that whole Social Security lockbox thing that Al Gore and George Bush kept talking about.

"There was nothing in that election that I felt even remotely related to my life," said Ms. Reyes, who is 22.

But now, even with a full college classload, a baby and a part-time job, she spends nearly 20 hours a week in Albuquerque, her hometown, trying to get other young people to register to vote.

What happened to change Ms. Reyes was not just the issues - terrorism, the Iraq war and college costs, she said - but simple math.

"It hit me the same way it hits other people when I tell them: New Mexico was decided by 366 votes - I mean, that's how many people I expect to register, because I think I can do 300 easy," she said.

Ms. Reyes is part of the clipboard army scouring malls, public squares, concerts, county fairs and schools this year in search of what campaign managers consider the most malleable of electoral quarry: the young, unregistered voter.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/15/politics/campaign/15youth.html?th=&pagewanted=print&position=

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 08:54 AM

As much as you rail on the issue War Dog...you must consider that the White House has accepted the documents without question...

Nice try at obfuscation though...

And to stifle the specualtion as to what I'm doing lately...I'm busy, I do not need "told that I'm smart" I'm insulted by the suggestion that I'd be so emotionally shallow...Hell I'm insulted by every bullshit emotion that gets attributed to me.

When I'm not busy I will spend some time around here but for the near future I've simply got better things to do.

If I leave any void...fill it yourselves.

And War Dog stop rehashing old crap that's out of date, skewed and presented with a bias...you're a disengenuous putz that will be paying the price for your actions long into your future.

Posted by: Nobody [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 08:54 AM

September 15, 2004
OP-ED COLUMNIST
Mr. Bush's Glass House
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

resident Bush's paramount problem with his National Guard years is not that he took shortcuts in 1972. The problem is that he still refuses to come clean about it.

So as we get caught up in the furor over the CBS documents showing favoritism in President Bush's National Guard career, let's bear a couple of points in mind.

First, there's reason to be suspicious of some of those CBS documents. For starters, a Guard veteran who worked with the supposed author, Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, tells me that abbreviations in the documents are wrong. He says group should be "GP" rather than "GRP," there should be no period after "Lt," and Mr. Bush's Social Security number should have been used rather than his old service number.

Second, we shouldn't be distracted by our doubts about the CBS documents. There's no doubt that Mr. Bush benefited from favoritism. The speaker of the Texas House has acknowledged making the call to get Mr. Bush into the National Guard.

Does any of this matter? What troubles me is less Mr. Bush's advantage three decades ago and more his denial today. Mr. Bush's own route to avoid the draft underscores the disparities in America, yet his policies seem based on a kind of social Darwinism in which the successful make their own opportunities. His tax cuts and entire outlook seem rooted in ideas not of noblesse oblige, but of noblesse entitlement.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/15/opinion/15kris.html?th=&pagewanted=print&position=

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 08:57 AM

moniker of the DAY!!!

Posted by: disengenuous putz at September 15, 2004 08:58 AM

Toni!

good farkin' morning!

Posted by: bibimimi at September 15, 2004 08:58 AM

ON THIS DAY

On Sept. 15, 1963, four children were killed when a bomb went off during Sunday services at a black Baptist church in Birmingham, Alabama.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 08:59 AM

BIBI, Mornin to you too.
Another day of crap!?! Yes.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 09:00 AM

Does any of this matter? What troubles me is less Mr. Bush's advantage three decades ago and more his denial today. Mr. Bush's own route to avoid the draft underscores the disparities in America, yet his policies seem based on a kind of social Darwinism in which the successful make their own opportunities. His tax cuts and entire outlook seem rooted in ideas not of noblesse oblige, but of noblesse entitlement.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 09:02 AM

Okla. Senate Candidate Is Accused of Fraud

By Lois Romano
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 15, 2004; Page A03

TULSA, Sept. 14 -- One of the most competitive Senate races in the country turned nasty this week, as former GOP congressman and obstetrician Tom Coburn has had to respond to published reports that he committed Medicaid fraud 14 years ago.

The allegation stems from a medical malpractice suit brought by a 20-year-old woman who said that Coburn, without her permission, removed one of her fallopian tubes, which left her sterilized. The case never went to trial, but court documents first reported this week by Salon.com show that Coburn withheld information about the sterilization in submitting a bill to Medicaid for a related procedure involving a troubled pregnancy because the Medicaid program does not cover the sterilization of anyone younger than 21. Coburn said he withheld the information to ensure the woman was reimbursed for the cost of removing the other fallopian tube in which a fetus was lodged.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21673-2004Sep14.html?referrer%3Demail

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 09:06 AM

An OB/GYN that loves his patient, as Pres Bush says.
Loves the patient, cheats medicaid.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 09:07 AM

good mornin toni and nobody and war dog and bibi!
war dog im thinking this in going to back fire on your peples plans:

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/9/14/223720.shtml

if they are go forward with that im seeing all the media are rally round dan rather. jusn my pinion.

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 09:09 AM

Nebulous was laying some eloquent lines on us this AM wasn't he?

How's yer jointz treating you t'day, girl?

Posted by: bibimimi at September 15, 2004 09:10 AM

Bush's Words Contradict Agenda
Praise for Putin Clashes With U.S. Promotion of Democracy

By Glenn Kessler and Robin Wright
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, September 15, 2004; Page A17

On Sunday, President Bush visited the Russian Embassy to pay his respects to the victims of last week's terrorist attack at a Russian school and to express his admiration of Russian President Vladimir Putin. "Please pass on my very best wishes to President Vladimir Putin, a man who I admire," Bush told the Russian ambassador.

The next day, Putin announced plans that would significantly bolster his power by ending the popular election of governors and independent lawmakers.

Secretary of State Colin L. Powell cautioned Russia against moving away from the democratic process and democratic reforms in pursuing terrorists. (Shaun Heasley -- Reuters)

While Bush administration officials, such as Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, quickly raised questions yesterday about whether Putin's action will strangle democracy in Russia, outside experts said the administration's gentle handling of Putin stands in stark contrast to the president's repeated pledges to promote democracy and freedom around the world.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21557-2004Sep14.html

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 09:11 AM

How's yer jointz treating you t'day, girl?

Posted by: bibimimi at September 15, 2004 09:10 AM

Today we are expecting lots of rain and storms later in the day so the Front is starting to come in and of course the pain comes with the Front.
But I will get through as usual.

Fell really bad about the people in the way of the Hurrican, again.

We have a big deficit from the idiot war on Iraq and Mother Nature sent us another blow.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 09:15 AM

And War Dog stop rehashing old crap that's out of date, skewed and presented with a bias...you're a disengenuous putz that will be paying the price for your actions long into your future.

Posted by: Nobody at September 15, 2004 08:54 AM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mornin Nobody..

With things developing in the election the way they have..

I've been thinking about what Bush is going to do after he was reelected..

You know they've really been holding back in Iraq..

Just not good PR to go on the offensive before November..

But after the election when Kerry is tucked away back in the Senate..

It will be time for a major counterattack on this insurgency!

We have had the city of Fallujah surrounded for months..

Time will have run out for Fallujah!


Posted by: War Dog [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 09:17 AM

hmmm. im maybe catch hell fore this but ima ask anyways. war dog kerry is work in the senate? im believ that like im believe bush is work on him ranch.

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 09:20 AM

perhaps it's a warning?

I remember someone writing about when the last space shuttle blew up and the wreckage was scattered over Texas, Bush should have seen it as a sign NOT to go to war.

Posted by: bibimimi at September 15, 2004 09:21 AM

a tip o' my cap to muck, nobody, and the dog in the yard.

Posted by: bibimimi at September 15, 2004 09:22 AM

bibi god must have told him itn good idea

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 09:23 AM


http://www.pharmacratic-inquisition.com/nontesters/pharmacratic/

+ *.* * + *.* .+ .*
*..+**.+**++.*..+*..+**.+**++.*.+ *
. * .+ .*.* *..+**.+**+..

Posted by: The New World Order Ladies Choir (we absolutely adore entheogens) at September 15, 2004 06:17 AM


+

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 09:26 AM

Muck, not God, that voice in his head he thinks is God.
Delusional president hears voices.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 09:27 AM

I understand he speak THROUGH him, not TO him.

Posted by: bibimimi at September 15, 2004 09:27 AM

Son of Sam was a black lab retriever...

Posted by: bibimimi at September 15, 2004 09:28 AM

I understand he speak THROUGH him, not TO him.

Posted by: bibimimi at September 15, 2004 09:27 AM

-------

claims bush with the brain of a cod
democracy stuff is so odd
he says with a gloat
you don’t need to vote
‘cause I get my nod from god

Posted by: RWiley [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 09:31 AM

Well you could be right Mucki..

But I don't really think it makes any difference in Iraq..

Given the same choice of securing the election in January..

Or turning the country over to the insurgents..

President Kerry would have no choice but to attack Fallujah..

Sistani wants the election in January..

And if we ever hope to disengage that election must take place..

We're not talking about Nader or Dean..

President Kerry is a good war dog!

Posted by: War Dog [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 09:31 AM

http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/
Noam Chomsky Blog Archive

Posted by: Pharoh Dava at September 15, 2004 09:33 AM

hep hep

Posted by: passiveconsumer at September 15, 2004 09:33 AM

we are move next to old graveyard now and im swear im see peples walk past door now and then and when im check no one there. im not think itn god tho. but it culd be ole sam bass. im hear he in bury there and is got kill nearby.

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 09:34 AM

some one told me there was a death in my apartment,so i just talk out loud every once in a while to the ghost, stuff like, wanna come with me to class? wanna go see a show. i sleep pretty good...

Posted by: passiveconsumer at September 15, 2004 09:36 AM


CBS News and anchorman Dan Rather have entered the journalistic equivalent of one of Dante’s circles of Hell, forced to live forever with a scandal they created. With their Texas Air National Guard forgeries, they now live in a neighborhood of national media embarrassments. Faked Food Lion resumes. Staged GM pickup truck explosions. Janet Cooke’s profile of Jimmy the eight-year-old coke addict. Jayson Blair’s phony travelogues from "West Virginia."

Watergate was a scandal Mr. Rather thoroughly enjoyed, since he built his career on ripping into Richard Nixon. Now Rather is Nixon, a bitter, vengeful man who allowed his friends to use dirty tricks against his political opponents and when caught, can only deny, deny, deny and bluster about the evil intentions of his enemies.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 09:37 AM

http://www.zogby.com/

"Zogby Interactive Survey in Progress
Click Here to Participate"

On the main page, right-hand side, you can click and choose to click and choose. It was interesting, only took a few moments, and as a reward for participating they give you access to a few reports.
If you don't want to participate, at least take a gander at Boo!-sh job performance perception graph :)

Posted by: Poll Cat at September 15, 2004 09:38 AM

Limricked again!
Mornin' RW--

Did it get cold up there last night?

Posted by: bibimimi at September 15, 2004 09:39 AM

im just not want it to be david icke lizard peples.

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 09:40 AM

The ultimate excuse came from Rather himself, insisting his critics have to prove him wrong: "Until someone shows me definitive proof that they are not, I don't see any reason to carry on a conversation with the professional rumor mill." Mr. Rather, you have it completely backward. The responsibility is yours to get it right in the first place.

Posted by: at September 15, 2004 09:40 AM

nonymous thatn just way bushchainey is skirt the issue.

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 09:42 AM

right wing douchebag!

Posted by: bob novak vinegar and water cocktail at September 15, 2004 09:43 AM

if you going be troll at least get em nic like war dog is have and give link. also make shure you are have sumthin relevant sides em pinion peace. let me know if you are need help. we are help you be a good litter troll.

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 09:48 AM

right wing douchebag!

Posted by: bob novak vinegar and water cocktail at September 15, 2004 09:43 AM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Good morning Janeane..

Nice to have you with us..

But you really didn't respond to the anonymous post..

It was pointed out last night after the show..

That this kind of a reply, is not a reply at all..

And is very much the reason the Democrats are losing this election!

Posted by: War Dog [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 09:49 AM

Cuba's world view

On its international news page it covers three stories: political reform in Russia, the possible trial of General Pinochet in Chile and also alongside a large photograph of protesters at the recent Republican convention in New York, a piece about election monitors preparing to travel to the US expecting irregularities, as it says, in the forthcoming elections.

Granma is the official paper of Cuba's Communist Party and it is incidentally named after the boat in which Fidel Castro returned to Cuba in the 1950s to start the Cuban revolution.

It runs to eight pages, has no advertising and costs just under half a British penny.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3658410.stm

pinko propaganda.

Posted by: passiveconsumer at September 15, 2004 09:49 AM

pinko propaganda? at least itn come at a good price. how much are cost the neo-con rags?

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 09:51 AM

For you Muck, I think you'll like:

http://www.pharmacratic-inquisition.com/nontesters/pharmacratic/

watch the video when you get a chance.

Posted by: ghost of noam chomsky at September 15, 2004 09:52 AM

yet further proof of a promise not kept:

http://www.glcq.com/new_document.htm

Posted by: bibimimi at September 15, 2004 09:53 AM

pro-pinko sarcasm here.

just seeing the words no advertising makes me salivate.

Posted by: passiveconsumer at September 15, 2004 09:53 AM

How old is Castro now?

When you think of what Cuba could've been..

When you think of how Cuba could've been the Maui of the Caribbean..

And how the people of Cuba could've led such a wonderful life..

Living on a great Island..

You have to wonder how evil can live that long!

Posted by: War Dog [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 09:54 AM

thanks. ima e-mail that addy to myself for safe keps. later im put link to it on my blog.

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 09:54 AM

read the article war dog.
I don't see bush heading into the eyeof an oncoming hurricane to rally the people.

afterwards sure....
like always.

Posted by: passiveconsumer at September 15, 2004 09:55 AM

Just not a big fan of those failed systems..

The real test will be when the old boy dies..

How many minutes do you think it will take..

Before the counterrevolution seeks its revenge!

Posted by: War Dog [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 10:00 AM

fidelito is make purdy good cigars

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 10:04 AM

hmmm. ima not agree halfempty on this but he was always tell me itn becuz the system not tried in the right places.

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 10:06 AM

http://www.thebitchgirls.us/

can't tell if this a neocon site....
very pro gun.
to the point of feardom.
or its sarcasm.

Posted by: passiveconsumer at September 15, 2004 10:07 AM

"When you think of how Cuba could've been the Maui of the Caribbean..
And how the people of Cuba could've led such a wonderful life.."

wardog, why would cubans highest aspirations be to be a resort for rich americans to visit?
they tried that remember? cuba was a casino for frank sinatra and his friends...remember?
perhaps being our playground is not enough for some countries in this world.
as for the poverty, does the phrase 'us sanctions' mean anything to you?

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 10:09 AM

ima pro-gun. war dog im give you this story you are see how the man is step on our neck:

DETROIT (AP) - Democrat John Kerry has a new campaign worker helping him drum up support in Alabama after hiring a woman who was fired for displaying the presidential candidate's bumper sticker on her car.

Kerry called Lynne Gobbell on Tuesday after reading a newspaper story describing how she had been fired last Thursday from her job packing cellulose insulation at a Moulton, Ala., plant.

Gobbell said her former employer had told her she could either work for him or Kerry. She said Kerry told her, "Let him know that as of today, you're working for John Kerry."

"He was proud of me for standing up for what I believe in," the newly employed, 41-year-old said of her quick phone call with the candidate.

Gobbell said Kerry didn't offer too many details about her new position. She will be helping the campaign and may be traveling a little as it gets closer to the election.

She could receive help from another corner, as well. A liberal Web site, AMERICAblog.org, began raising money for Gobbell on Monday night after learning of her dismissal. John Aravosis, who runs the site, said he collected $1,800 over a 24-hour period.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/bw-elect/2004/sep/14/091401244.html

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 10:10 AM

http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=7067

neo-con journalist vs. 30 protestors in the tank at rnc

Posted by: passiveconsumer at September 15, 2004 10:11 AM

"the man is step on our neck"

Grab his ankle, knock him on his ass, and kick 'im in the tenders, I say!
Then run away fast...

Posted by: Fight Back at September 15, 2004 10:16 AM

wardog, why would cubans highest aspirations be to be a resort for rich americans to visit?
they tried that remember? cuba was a casino for frank sinatra and his friends...remember?
perhaps being our playground is not enough for some countries in this world.
as for the poverty, does the phrase 'us sanctions' mean anything to you?


Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 10:09 AM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The revolution has worked out so well hasn't it?

They have the best educated poverty stricken people in the world!

Keep those damn cruise ships out of the harbor!

Keep the casinos out of the city's!

No resorts on our beaches!

We will try to sneak tourists in the back door for a nickel on the dollar!

When you fight against capitalism, you lose every time!

Posted by: War Dog [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 10:18 AM

Sept. 15, 2004 | WASHINGTON -- Over the last three years, the group of 9/11 widows turned activists dubbed the "Jersey Girls" have become a fixture on the Washington political scene. Some of them are Republicans, others Democrats or independents. But they are all determined to hold official Washington accountable for the attacks that killed their husbands and nearly 3,000 others. They have held news conferences, lobbied members of Congress, pored over documents, and forced the White House to accept an independent commission to investigate the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Along the way, the women have learned about coverups, obfuscation, political cowardice, deceptions and the dangers of eschewing international alliances for a go-it-alone foreign policy.

And their conclusion: For the sake of the country's future, John Kerry must replace George W. Bush.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/09/15/widows/

Posted by: bibimimi at September 15, 2004 10:20 AM

-When you fight against capitalism, you lose every time!-

keep repeating that to your self, it drwons out the bay of pigs, afganistan, vietnam, korea, Iraq very nicely.

Posted by: passiveconsumer at September 15, 2004 10:23 AM

wardog, the us was hostile to castro et al from the beginning...i have no idea how the revolution would have worked out if we'd left them alone and neither do you...it's entirely possible that cuba would not have chosen to fight capitalism - only both parties have to get something out of it...you cannot demand that they do exactly as we would have them and then impose sanctions when they don't...we would never stand for it...why would they?
the poverty comes from our sanctions, wardog...so are you proud of us?
again, not everybody wants to turn their country into a playground for americans...which seems to be your vision for the world.

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 10:24 AM

* Registering is only half the battle. Almost half of registered unmarried women don't vote. If they turned out in numbers, unmarried women would be the largest voting bloc and would be the deciding "X" factor in close elections.

Posted by: passiveconsumer at September 15, 2004 10:28 AM

Hi again,
Computer froze. Had to de-infest it again.
No real viruses, jest those pesky adware and spyware stuff.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 10:38 AM

goddamer im shuld check my e-mail moren offen.

Posted by: muck4doo at September 15, 2004 10:41 AM

What Bush reaps...so shall he sow....

Hell on Haifa Street: bomb kills 47 in Baghdad
By Patrick Cockburn in Baghdad
15 September 2004


Pools of blood, broken glass and discarded shoes were spread across Haifa Street in Baghdad yesterday after a bomb exploded outside a police station, leaving a crater seven feet across.

The blast tore through a crowd of young men who were trying to get jobs in the police force. Forty-seven people were killed and at least 114 wounded.

Charred body parts hung from trees and birds killed by the blast lay scattered across the street in one of Baghdad's busiest shopping districts, which has become a front line in the spreading insurrection against Iraq's US-backed government.

The explosion was caused by a suicide bomber who blew up a car filled with artillery shells. "There was a loud explosion and suddenly my body was covered in blood," said Yassin Hamid, 21, as he lay in a nearby hospital. "I decided to join the police to help my family."

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=561788

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 10:41 AM

tonid, glad to see you slept well last night...i suppose we'll have more sleepless nights before nov. 2...myself, i've been getting twitchy muscles under my eyes - mostly after reading about iraq or election-stealing attempts in florida, etc!

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 10:43 AM

Jenise, I am sure more sleepless nights.
Glad my nephew came around. That bothered me because I know how he really feels deep down. He's a good man and a Viet Vet.
Just listening to the faux news too much.
I will post something from moveon.org re paper ballots and bills to improve voting that need to be passed.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 10:46 AM

poverty comes from our sanctions, wardog...so are you proud of us?
again, not everybody wants to turn their country into a playground for americans...which seems to be your vision for the world.

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 10:24 AM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Of course there isn’t much of a point arguing about another failed system..

But I believe Cuba had the whole world is a trading partner..

Hardly anyone paid any attention to the US sanctions..

And of course why would that system need to help of United States!

And don't forget the Soviet Union carried Castro until it broke their back!

And their system failed!

No, I'm just not a fan of those failed systems!

Fighting capitalism is like fighting freedom you're gonna lose every time!


Posted by: War Dog [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 10:46 AM

Dear MoveOn member,

With just a few weeks left until Election Day, it's increasingly
urgent that Congress act now to ensure that we all have a chance to
vote on Voter Verified Paper Ballots.

Members of Congress will only be in Washington for a couple of weeks
before leaving to hit the campaign trail. We've got to demand
immediate action on two key federal bills that would require paper
ballots: a Senate bill sponsored by a Republican, Sen. John Ensign,
and a House bill sponsored by a Democrat, Rep. Rush Holt.


Urge your Senators to:

"Please co-sponsor Senator Ensign's 'Voting Integrity and
Verification Act,' # S 2437."

Urge your Representative to:

"Please co-sponsor Rep. Holt's 'Voter Confidence and
Increased Accessibility Act,' # HR 2239."

P.S.: For more information on Voter-Verified Paper Ballots, see:

http://www.verifiedvoting.org

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 10:48 AM

n fighting freedom is fightin god.

Posted by: passiveconsumer at September 15, 2004 10:48 AM

Just got my verification for being an election judge. Have to attend a class which I am looking forward to. We have computer voting, but we get paper confirmation.
You slide your ballot in and get a confirmation back. I just want to see if tampering is possible.

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 10:51 AM

tonid, i'll look for the moveon.org stuff...it is good news about your nephew...my father is a moderate republican, but he says he's voting for kerry this time...but i keep checking just to make sure, you know?

was waiting for wardog's reply, but i guess it's not coming...just a message to the world: take our dollars, build resorts for us and shut up! geez...

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 10:51 AM

Things are back to normal in Lee county this morning, but not after a tense night at a Beattyville prison. Just after 7:00p.m., inmates rioted, setting fire to three buildings.

Officials aren't sure what sparked the riot, or how the prisoners were able to start the fires. Right now there's no word how many inmates were involved.

vermont and kentucky?
No inmates escaped during the riot. 8 prisoners suffered minor injuries. Here's some background for you.


The Lee Adjustment Center is a privately-run prison, owned by Corrections Corporation of America based in Nashville.

The facility holds about 800 men, 400 hundred from Kentucky, the other half from Vermont.


http://www.wtvq.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WTVQ/MGArticle/TVQ_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031777957661&path=!home

Posted by: passiveconsumer at September 15, 2004 10:54 AM

With this election just about to wrap up..

You folks need to be careful not to make the emotional investment in John Kerry that you made in Al Gore!

You remember what it felt like after the 2000 elections were over!

What you should do, is get excited about the 2008 elections..

That will be a great contest!

The Republicans will have nobody in the on deck circle..

And Hillary will have a four-year campaign for the presidency.

Now I don't hate John Kerry..

He is a good war dog!

But that Hillary, she is a different story!

Now that is going to be an interesting race!

Posted by: War Dog [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2004 10:55 AM

U.S. Shift on Iraq Funds Worries Lawmaker

Wednesday September 15, 2004 3:31 PM
By KEN GUGGENHEIM
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush administration's plans to divert $3.46 billion in Iraq reconstruction funds for security could increase dangers in the long run, the Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said Wednesday.

Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., also said the slow pace of spending on reconstruction ``means that we are failing to fully take advantage of one of our most potent tools to influence the direction of Iraq.''

State Department officials appeared before Lugar's panel seeking lawmakers' support for the shift of funds, which needs congressional approval. The proposal would cover almost of a fifth of the $18.4 billion approved by Congress last year, mostly for water, electricity and other public works projects. The money was part of an $87 billion package for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The request comes as heavy fighting continues between U.S.-led forces and a variety of Iraqi insurgents. The violence and bureaucratic delays have slowed spending of reconstruction funds. Lugar said only $1.14 billion has been spent as of Sept. 8, almost a year after it had been approved by Congress.

Lugar said the reconstruction spending is important for winning the support of Iraqis. Efforts to improve security should be aimed at allowing the projects to proceed, he said.

``If the shift of these funds slows down reconstruction, security may suffer in the long run. In short, security and reconstruction must be achieved simultaneously,'' he said.

Democrats say the request demonstrates the administration's poor planning for the war and its unrealistic optimism that U.S. forces would be greeted as liberators and that Iraqis could pay for their own reconstruction.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4496675,00.html

Posted by: tonid at September 15, 2004 11:00 AM

===================================================
NEW THREAD
===================================================
===================================================
NEW THREAD
===================================================
===================================================
NEW THREAD
===================================================
===================================================
NEW THREAD
===================================================

Posted by: Nik E Poo at September 15, 2004 11:03 AM

Why are you still pissing on the blog War Dog?

You do realize that it is no better than torture.

It's just a different degree of it. Were you like GW and shot at your siblings?

So tired, of coming here and seeing you shit and piss on people that are caring and kind.

Why don’t you expend you energy towards electing the loser you stand behind.


Coming here will not help your cause.

Posted by: stubs at September 15, 2004 11:07 AM

funny, wardog, i thought reagan broke the soviet union's back...and by fighting freedom, you mean what's going on in iraq right now?

just watching the news, DPJ and the communist party have finally placed responsibility for japan's involvement in iraq with koizumi....this is good news.

see you guys later. keep fighting.

Posted by: jenise at September 15, 2004 11:09 AM

Upon your suggestion, I sent an email this morning to Jim Lehrer at NewsHour. I encourage others to so the same!

Attn: Jim Lehrer

I have been watching the NewsHour for years and have always appreciated your reporting and commentary.

It is in this spirit that I implore you to ask both of the presidential candidates tough questions during the debate you will moderate later this month. We Americans (and you are included in this group) deserve to hear difficult, thought provoking questions geared towards the issues AND have them answered before this crucial election. Why not take Peter Jennings advice to throw out the ridiculous rules and ask the questions that journalists should/need to be asking of our elected officials.

We citizens rely on your ability to get 'in front' of the candidates and once there - we demand that you hold our leaders accountable.
We rely on you for so much and I don't want you to let us down.

Please...reread this letter now, and then do the difficult thing and 'step up' for us...the citizens that you help inform, the citizens that the politicians work for.

Thank you for your time!

Posted by: Amalia at September 15, 2004 12:36 PM